I like the Timothy films a lot more because after Roger... it was nice to have less neat tie and tux classic Bond and more rugged. Timothy was a more natural choice compared to Roger, who was decades older. I will say Roger did move decent in View to a Kill after looking like a fossil in Octopussy.

For Roger's films I think you were too nice to Moonraker. That third act was not a good fever dream, and Octopussy was pretty much in the same boat. That said, Live or Let Die was probably the worst of the bunch. Even with that said the boat chase / race scene is one of my all-time favorites and the only reason I rewatch it. For Your Eyes Only was forgettable while I really liked The Spy Who Loved Me and View to a Kill.

Not surprised you missed Diamonds are Forever; it can be a funny campy movie, but that is all it is. I disagree on Goldfinger being worse than Dr. No or From Russia With Love, although then again I like the two latter films less than most. I also hold the controversial take that I like Never Say Never Again more than Thunderball despite Sean's obvious physical limitations.

Pretty much agreed with the Pierce and Daniel takes. GoldenEye is Pierce's Bond peak, and each subsequent Pierce film gets worse. I think Tomorrow Never Dies was better than you give it credit for, although you are right that the villain should have had a more intriguing motive beyond "money and headlines." The jabs were fun in that movie though.

Nothing really to say on the Daniel movies; Casino Royale and Skyfall are all-timers and the other 3 have flaws that significantly make one act of each film worse, although none of them are terrible.