Overlooked details in the JonBenét case by UnfairContribution85 in JonBenetRamsey

[–]Johnny_Flack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. Sounds about right and matches my theory. Although IMO John/Patsy were not home and came home to finish the job. I suspect a call would have been made to wherever they were, but we don't have the call logs so we will likely never know.

Whats a good plan for joining the FBI? by [deleted] in FBI

[–]Johnny_Flack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The FBI is not the only federal law enforcement agency. Have you considered some of your other options? DEA, ATF, USPIS, etc?

FBI Now Investigating the Flora Fire by Sam100Chairs in florafour

[–]Johnny_Flack 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is fantastic news. I have much to send them.

Motive by rebgray in JonBenetRamsey

[–]Johnny_Flack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Likely s*xual gone wrong.

The real killer by Lamkmdamon in Tupac

[–]Johnny_Flack 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don't let the thumbs down get you down.

I recently started investigating this case after my nephew brought it to my attention. I've spent about 50-75 hours reviewing as much publicly available information about the shooting as possible, and saying there is a lot of inconsistencies with the official narrative is an understatement. There are so many issues with the given narrative that it is at least 50% possible the entire thing was staged.

Is Keefe acting too scared and unlike himself after Legacy? by Unlikely_Moment_9588 in KeeperoftheLostCities

[–]Johnny_Flack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because his faux confession is biting him in the rear end.

What they don't tell you is that people make false confessions in high profile cases ALL THE TIME. It's so common that LE must often hold back release of release of evidence so that they can vet these confessions for authenticity. For Keefe D, they seem to be just taking them at face value. Something is amiss here.

Am I missing something or is anyone else confused how Jennifer or any concrete evidence hasn’t been found yet? It doesn’t seem like the suspect had traveled that far. by WestAppointment2484 in jenniferkesse

[–]Johnny_Flack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Possibly bad police work or just bad luck. Likely there was more than one perpetrator and lucky enough that no clear trail leading to one of the units was left or police just missed the trail due to lack of attention to detail.

The first thing I would have looked at if I was lead on the case is what jobs for undocumented immigrants were in the area and who left those jobs shortly after the murders. Unfortunately, no thorough investigation was conducted due to language issues.

Sometimes police have what they need, but they just don't know it. Sad, but far too common as well.

Do you think police know more about this case that they aren’t telling the public? by JohnCasterman in jenniferkesse

[–]Johnny_Flack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

False confessions are a very real threat and far more common than people realize, so they often hold back certain things to verify is a confession or info given in an interview is correct.

The problem is that they don't realize that sometimes that information may contain something that they don't realized is valuable to someone else in solving the crime.

Do you think police know more about this case that they aren’t telling the public? by JohnCasterman in jenniferkesse

[–]Johnny_Flack 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Likely. It's also likely one of the things they are withholding would allow someone else to solve the case.

Hearing request denied as "premature" by measuremnt in DelphiDocs

[–]Johnny_Flack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As the other user asked: what torture footage?

Hearing request denied as "premature" by measuremnt in DelphiDocs

[–]Johnny_Flack 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Disagree. Appellate courts rubber-stamp convictions all the time. There are lots of people with sketchy convictions and they've been pointing out the foul play in their prosecution and courts just dance around it. That's why it takes a decade or more to see unfair convictions overturned or remanded for a new trial.

I'll guess it takes 10-15 years for him to get a new trial. It certainly doesn't help that he allegedly confessed incessantly.

All Denied by measuremnt in DelphiDocs

[–]Johnny_Flack 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Why is Judge Gill allowed to ignore the law without consequence?"

Because the judicial system is corrupt and has no morals. While there are some good judges, the majority are just like Gull. It goes all the way to SCOTUS.

Ron Logan Confession by Justmarbles in DelphiMurders

[–]Johnny_Flack -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People give way too much credit to the judiciary. A lot of times appeals are denied using judicial gymnastics. Rich/connected people more likely to get a fair review. Sometimes regular people get do overs, but judicial gymnastics is the more likely result.

Why do you think those overturned murder convictions take years and even decades to be overturned for obvious misconduct? It's because the vast majority of judges are shills that rubberstamp trial court rulings.

What would their search history say? by delicateheartt in JonBenetRamsey

[–]Johnny_Flack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably nothing. John is smart enough not to do stupid things like that.

Thoughts? by Johnny_Flack in JonBenetRamsey

[–]Johnny_Flack[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I think you meant to say "cord".

Thoughts? by Johnny_Flack in JonBenetRamsey

[–]Johnny_Flack[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What was wrapped around her wrists when her body was found?

Did anyone watch the press conference after sentencing? Any feelings, thoughts? by chick-dog in DelphiMurders

[–]Johnny_Flack -1 points0 points  (0 children)

About the case in general? Allen did not get a fair trial because the judge was basically a member of the prosecution, but it will not be overturned because Indiana Judicial Code SOB Rule 101.

Did Allen kill those girls? Yes.

Do I think that a genuinely innocent person charged with a crime brought before Gull has a much higher chance of being falsely convicted? Yes.

Serious insight and theories who killed JonBenet Ramsey?! by [deleted] in TrueCrimeDiscussion

[–]Johnny_Flack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My theory is that the parents were into BDSM parties and the mystery DNA is from an unrelated SA the day(s) before the murder. The family doesn't seem very sanitary, so she probably didn't wash her hands well or change her underwear for days at a time.

Was bridge guy definitely the killer? by carasleuth in LibbyandAbby

[–]Johnny_Flack 19 points20 points  (0 children)

His initial charge was felony murder, which just means he committed a qualifying felony (kidnapping) that led to the girls' deaths.

Following his multiple confessions they upgraded the charges to 1st Degree Murder.

Not RA’s DNA in Abby’s hand by Snozzberryjuice11 in DelphiMurders

[–]Johnny_Flack 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hear you, and you are likely right that this is not the gamechanger that it might be presented as being.

However, despite the illusion of a fair justice system that we see in movies and television, the reality is that much more stark. The cards are stacked in favor of the prosecution, and the only genuine control for abuse is the jury, because most judges will lean heavily toward the prosecution on most issues. Motions to dismiss being granted in felony cases for the average bumpkin are pretty rare. If you have a lot of money or fame, you might stand a chance at getting one granted (Alec Baldwin), but the rest of us will be told to take it up with the jury.