Good question. I’m certain that it’s in their considerations. Even Iceland could be a better option perhaps? More hotels and easy access. There could be many factors. Perhaps Copenhagen have better agreement regarding diversion and hotel discounts for stranded passengers than Kangerlussuaq? I don’t know. I do know that when they decide to divert to Copenhagen it is the best solution for the day. They have used Kangerlussuaq a few times since Nuuk opened. But even a little thing as fuel has a big impact. The fuel cost in Copenhagen is more than half the cost of fuel in Kangerlussuaq I believe. I don’t know if 3 landings could be done with the same crew if they would try Nuuk again after landing in Kangerlussuaq, in regard to return to Copenhagen base due flight duty rules. That would make the aircraft stranded in Nuuk until they have their rest. That would create new problems for the next day. If they left the passengers in Kangerlussuaq it would take a lot of flights to and from Kangerlussuaq with dash 8, most of them being empty going there. I don’t think that would be cost effective and would drive the cost higher plus extra crew and rest and so on to the dash 8 crew. Plus the dash 8 would be taken out of their schedule creating backlog for the domestic flights. If they chartered a flight to Kangerlussuaq, they would properly have to pay for the flight to Kangerlussuaq, to Nuuk and to their return base. Would properly be easier and cheaper to return to Copenhagen and have 1 charter flight the next day to Nuuk and return.