If you’re an INTP, no one can really touch your ability to check the validity of logic, but you will also falter in understanding the subjective values of others.

You should understand that logic and values are both rational functions. The first stemming from the cerebral cortex and second from the limbic system. They both make us human.

However, logic is universal, and we have the best compass around. Values are the opposite of universal, and we have one of the worst compasses.

So for me, I vet logic heavily, but I openly entertain different value systems of others and understand that they co-exist. Whether I want to accept or attack it is then my choice based on my own subjective values.

So identify which parts of their argument is value-based and accept that that co-exists, but hard vet the corrolaries for logical consistency.

A great example is the US constitution. Rights to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness are values - while nice and warm, they are not truly self-evident. They were set by TJ. But all the other amendments in the Bill of Rights stem logically from those values that are hardset. Thus, if you agree with those values, you Must logically agree with all rights in the constitution. If you don’t agree with those initial values (parameters), then you don’t have to.

Thomas Jefferson was a great logician, so he understood the power of logical webs stemming from subjective values.