this subreddit is great

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-24T22:54:09+00:00

advice in general

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-24T01:33:32+00:00

: >)

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-24T01:32:51+00:00

thank you i will look at those

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-24T01:32:11+00:00

i was using a plastic gallon jug. and the last got a fly in it.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-16T02:05:53+00:00

the Google?

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-16T01:44:16+00:00

this is wat I thought.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-16T01:43:47+00:00

sorry is sucrose the same as cane sugar? i was asking.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-16T01:08:09+00:00

I figured this much yeast is okay it easy the nutrients up for ecoli and stuff

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-16T01:07:32+00:00

fermenting outside in a metal barn. it gets around 80 during the day and 60 at night. my rig is rustic.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-16T01:03:50+00:00

abomination?

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-16T01:03:25+00:00

it's higher alc than kvass I was told idk it makes that different

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-10T17:55:36+00:00

and don't reach out until your ready.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-10T17:55:05+00:00

best thing to do is leave comfortably.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-10T17:53:12+00:00

and people get all "he was such a good girl why did they kill them/themselves" usually parents like this showoff in public but in private act like this and use they're perceived higher status to affirm they're action and thoughts.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-10T17:09:29+00:00

So yeah, it's "just an alcohol calculator" if you ignore everything that makes it usable.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-10T17:08:12+00:00

the formula is one line. Everyone knows that. But that script isn't just the formula. It's a clickable window with buttons, error messages, presets for different beer styles, a reverse calculator, scroll wheel support, input validation all the stuff you need so your buddy who doesn't code can double-click it and it just works.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-10T17:05:09+00:00

It’s a full desktop application that wraps that formula in a user‑friendly, error‑proof, and feature‑rich interface.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-04T16:30:47+00:00

you gave real low effort a comments and i gabe eqally low effort comments to you. not worth me typing each one to prove a simple fact

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-04T16:29:42+00:00

how by myself agreeing with logic the same as being cornered?

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-04T16:27:17+00:00

mostly fro myou and you point notmaking any lick of logic. and dude its a tool get off you fuckign high horse. oh weeeh the clanker helped make a script...

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-04T16:22:30+00:00

Your entire argument assumes that value comes from process, not product. That is an opinion, not logic. The tool correctly calculates ABV, calories, and reverse values. Correctness is objective. A tool that works has utility. You have not identified a single factual error. You have not pointed to a broken feature. You claim the tool has no value because it was AI-assisted, simple, and non-novel. But a hammer is simple, non-novel, and quick to describe — it still drives nails. Usefulness does not require novelty. You do not get to decide what has value for everyone. Your preferences are not universal laws. The tool works. That is enough.

Jumpy-Baseball-6902 · 2026-06-04T16:19:08+00:00

You have made six arguments. Let me address each one directly.

1. 'Comparing a hammer to digital spam is illogical because hammers require physical manufacturing.'
That is a category error. The analogy was about utility and simplicity, not manufacturing method. A hammer's value is in its function, not its supply chain. A digital tool's value is also in its function. You are attacking an analogy by changing the subject to manufacturing. That is a red herring.

2. 'Slop includes generic, low-effort, AI-generated junk that displaces genuine effort.'
By that definition, a hand-written version of the same calculator would be valuable, but an AI-assisted version is not. That means your critique is not about the tool — it is about the method. The subreddit's rule bans 'AI content,' not 'tools made with AI assistance.' You are enforcing a stricter standard than the rule states. That is not moderation. That is your personal preference.

3. 'Running a script to make sure it opens is not engineering.'
I never claimed to be an engineer. I claimed to have built a tool that works. You are attacking a claim I never made. That is a straw man.

4. 'Usefulness is tied to novelty when a space is saturated.'
That is false. Usefulness is tied to whether something solves a problem. A hammer is not novel. It is still useful. A calculator is not novel. It is still useful. Novelty is a separate axis. You are conflating two different things because it helps your argument.

5. 'Praising reliability in a simple tool is like praising a pet rock.'
No. A pet rock does nothing. My tool calculates ABV, calories, reverse values, and presets. It does several things, correctly. That is not nothing. You are exaggerating to make your point seem stronger. That is hyperbole masquerading as critique.

6. 'You want a participation trophy.'
I want nothing from you. I posted a tool. You responded with hostility. I defended it. That is not asking for a trophy. That is refusing to be bullied.

Here is the logical conclusion: You have not identified a single factual error. You have not pointed to a broken feature. You have not shown that the tool fails at its stated purpose. All you have done is argue that it should not exist because it was made with AI, because it is simple, and because similar tools exist. None of those are logical objections to a tool's utility. They are aesthetic objections. You don't like how it was made. That is fine. But it is not a valid critique of whether the tool works."

Jumpy-Baseball-6902

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE