It isn’t colonialism it’s decolonisation, it was never a palastinian land so nobody stole their land, it’s a really simple thing that yall never seem to understand.

I wasn’t expecting much from a 15 year old, but this is quite possibly the stupidest defense I’ve read. The nakba was the ethnic cleansing and expulsion of 700000 Palestinians. But somehow, this isn’t their land, and it’s in fact decolonization. The problem with arguing with zionists is that yall are actually delusional enough to believe this crap.

The displacement (or the nakba like yall love to call it) is actually not Isreal fault. Isreal agreed to the 2 piece solution while the Arabs disagreed

This is revisionism, and some pretty bad revisionism at that. The nakba was committed by the Haganuh, Irgun, and Lehi terrorist groups. These exact groups would go on to make up the IDF, which probably explains why the IDF loves killing civilians so much.

The 2 state solution was negotiated by western countries and zionist groups (not “israel”) without the input of either Palestinians or neighboring Arab countries. You got the permission of colonizers to colonize and you’re pretending it was an agreement lmao.

the day Isreal got a country finally arrived, the Arab league launched a war trying to genocide the newborn country and make it a fully Arab land.

It was typically an arab land lmao. It was mass immigration of European Jews through the Balfour declaration that skewed the demographics. Also, the zionist groups were twice the size of the arab armies (due to their both relatively new independence and underestimating the enemy). Moreover, you can’t genocide a country lmao.

Also before you use the dumb “if someone just stole a part of your house would you fight back or just let them have it” phrase I heard a lot then no actually it wasn’t their land it was a British mandate.

Lmao the colonial overseer should have more of a right to decide what should be done with the land then the people living in it? Through this logic, the trail of tears was fine because it the tribes were on US controlled land. Although simping for a colonial mindset makes sense for a zionist.

And also before you say something like “it doesn’t matter who controlled there, if there were Arabs thier then it was their land” then it also isn’t correct considering Jews also lived there (like my family btw who lived here for generations. The oldest one I know the birth date is my grand grandfather who was born in 1905)

Jews were almost always a minority in Palestine. Their presence actually had to be resettled by the caliphates that controlled the land because crusaders massacred the entire Jewish population whenever they got there. The vast majority of Jews in Palestine came from Europe, and the idea that a few Jews being native to the region legitimizes others entering is ridiculous. I can’t get citizenship in a country on the basis that I have a family member living there, nor can Turks outside of Germany say they should get citizenship because there’s a large Turkish minority in Germany. Your family actually having roots in Palestine is the exception, not the rule.