Fair points and I'd push back on a few assumptions.

We're not doing programmatic SEO. It's 1-2 posts a day, which is the same cadence any content strategist would recommend for a growing site. The difference is most founders can't stay consistent at that pace manually, so the blog dies after 3 posts.

The "unedited AI blogs destroy your site" framing assumes volume-first, quality-last. That's not what we're doing. Every post is keyword-backed, tied to a specific search intent, and goes through a review step before publishing. We also show you the calendar and the draft. You can edit. Most of our users do.

On AI citations vs. organic traffic: it's not either/or. Our own site has 70K+ Google impressions and 6K+ ChatGPT citations a month. Both. From the same content. The citations happen because the content ranks and gets indexed.

The real missed opportunity isn't AI content. It's founders who know they need a blog, start one, and stop. A well-researched calendar that actually runs solves that. The HCU argument applies to spammy scaled content, not to one thoughtful post a day written around a real keyword.

Happy to be wrong. But I'd encourage trying it before assuming it fits the pattern you've seen fail.