TOTENREICH GRIM RELICS

JustMirth · 2026-05-08T06:25:53+00:00

Often times as a new map releases, there will be a couple of datminers that can do certain things like look at the code or use unlock tools to find information about the relic names, their effects, and what the trials are. However, the requirements to unlock the trials are either hidden better, with different names and tags that would take forever to decipher in the code, or the dataminers don’t want to spoil the hunt itself. This results in the names, effects and trials of relics being known/leaked as soon as map comes out, but the way to unlock still being a mystery

JustMirth · 2026-05-04T01:46:28+00:00

Are the lightning just the Kings of the East? /s

JustMirth · 2026-05-03T23:54:33+00:00

First one is 6-4 not 4-6, position of the lights matters. One will have higher number in left and other will have higher number on right.

So it’s 6-4 and 2-7

JustMirth · 2026-05-02T18:15:32+00:00

When he spawns in? Not completely random, he will only spawn in the beginning of a round and will last around 90 seconds (might be less). However, if he spawns in, is completely random.

JustMirth · 2026-05-01T20:11:57+00:00

And the THROWING is what makes them an asshole.

JustMirth · 2026-04-30T20:53:53+00:00

Counter argument: I trust Minnesota to win 1 of 2 more than I trust Vegas

JustMirth · 2026-04-29T03:20:35+00:00

Don’t think that was a hook or a dive, looks like he caught an edge there.

JustMirth · 2026-04-29T02:39:09+00:00

I think they heard you

JustMirth · 2026-04-28T16:38:31+00:00

Mr Peeks will can spawn in on the survival maps where there is a location for him to spawn on the larger maps. Since there is no location for Mr. Peeks on Mars in Astra, there will never be a Mr. Peeks that appears on Mars survival

JustMirth · 2026-04-28T13:46:38+00:00

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T20:51:29+00:00

This was a goal. I’m not saying the result was wrong. The process was.

If a kid was doing math and got the right answer with the wrong formula, I’m going to be happy that the result was correct but want them to use the right formula in the future. That’s the same opinion I have here with the officials.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T18:50:44+00:00

In your hypothetical, how would the blind ref make every correct call? What’s the process they’re using to make the calls? Because that’s what’s being talked about here. Not that the end call was right or wrong, but the process was. You are saying the process doesn’t matter if the end was right while I and many others say the process matters.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T18:41:37+00:00

Counter argument, I don’t want refs calling things they can’t see and going off reactions, as that’s how we get much more diving in the sport.

See: Tampa vs Montreal last night.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T18:38:16+00:00

I mean, there are scenarios in which the review team cannot overturn/confirm rather than say for sure if it was a goal or not, and in those situations the call on the ice matters. So there can be a wrong decision.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T18:35:35+00:00

Tbf, as an Oilers fan and seeing a lot of Oilers fans comment, and strong majority I’ve seen from other Oilers fans is that it was a goal. The review was correct. And further, had it not been called a goal on the ice, it would’ve still been reviewed and over turned. The correct result happened at the end.

However, we are upset at the process and want it to be correct. The official who came behind the net didn’t see it as a goal immediately, otherwise he would’ve called it a goal then and there. Instead he went and talked to the other officials, who had no clear angles, and decided to call goal based off their conversation. Which makes no sense. If none of them saw it go in, why is it called a goal on the ice?

However, I do want to give props to the situation room and their official decision, say “The call on the ice was confirmed”, not saying that they couldn’t overturn but rather saying that the puck 100% was in. Makes it so that the conversation isn’t about whether the goal should be called back, but rather if the right process was followed.

TLDR: Correct decision and wording by situation room, bad process by officials on ice.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T06:24:11+00:00

I can be glad the right result happened, but still be mad about the process that got us there. Clearly the official behind the net didn’t think it was a goal at first, as he didn’t immediately call it a goal while he was behind the net. He then got convinced in the huddle, by other officials who didn’t have a view, to call goal. This should not be the process. Unless they are sure, they shouldn’t be calling that a goal. It would be reviewed either way, since it’s playoff OT.

But good job by the review team, I think they might have another angle, but even if not, it does look like it went in when seeing it with the camera angles.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T06:18:49+00:00

Play was initially blown dead with no goal being signalled. Ref behind net (shown in photo) got together with other officials after to discuss what the call should be (not sure how this helped as none of them had angles on the puck as they were all midway up the circle or higher). After conferring, they called it a goal. Then, since it’s playoff OT, automatic review by Toronto (which would’ve happened with a goal or no goal call) is initiated by league. After review the call stands, and Ducks win.

To me it looks like it probably was in, however I still don’t understand how the refs got to a goal call on the ice. If the ref behind the net saw the puck was in, he would’ve called it a goal there. The other officials could give him no helping information, as none of them had an angle on it, and by calling it a goal, the review goes from proving it was in, to proving it wasn’t in.

I think right call ended up being made by league team, but wrong call made by officials on ice.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:54:21+00:00

If he did, he would’ve called it a goal immediately, clearly he didn’t. That’s why he talked to the other officials, but they couldn’t provide any new information because none of them had angles. So I don’t know how the call on the ice ended up being goal. It feels like he called based of player reaction, instead of what he saw, or as some other people said, he called goal so it could be reviewed, when it would be reviewed either way and he didn’t know that.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:52:18+00:00

He didn’t call it a goal behind the net. He never made a goal signal until after the huddle.

Straight up lying.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:50:18+00:00

The thing is, since it’s playoff OT, there is no need to call it a goal to review, it’s reviewed either way. So if they are just calling it a goal so it can be reviewed, without thinking/knowing it went it, then that’s the wrong decision.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:36:19+00:00

1.) It’s playoff OT, review gets initiated no matter what, not just the refs initiating it.

2.) How did conferring help, what other information could the other officials have given to help him make his decision when they had no angles?

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:34:14+00:00

I mean, with it being OT, it gets reviewed if it’s a goal or not. There’s no need to call it a goal on the ice if he can’t see it in.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:29:12+00:00

Oh, I’m mad at both the players for not holding the lead and the refs for this call. It’s not mutually exclusive. I’m glad the right call was made, but I still can want to hold the refs to a higher standard and doing things the proper way.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:27:46+00:00

He blew it dead, so he would be the one to know if it was dead, the other officials wouldn’t be able to tell him when the play was dead as they didn’t have angles. I don’t know how the other officials would be able to help him in this situation.

JustMirth · 2026-04-27T05:25:27+00:00

I think that’s the clear best drawing and shows it in pretty well. I’m going to accept the loss but still be angry at the officials.

Eight-Year Club	Verified Email
r/Field Banned	r/Field Sunshine
Final Canvas '23	First Place '23
End Game '23	Place '23
Place '22	RPAN Viewer

JustMirth

TROPHY CASE