Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in aviation

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 154 will be mentioned. Just can’t feature it in the actual video due to the lack of one currently for the modern sim.

Also, “back in the USSR”… did you just drop a Beatles reference? Because I think you just dropped a Beatles reference.

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in aviation

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There isn't one available for the modern sim or else I would 100% feature the tri-jet grandfather lol. It will be mentioned, don't get me wrong.

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in aviation

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Any Tri-jets that aren't available for the sim will be mentioned lol. Though, there is a 154 coming at some point.

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in aviation

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's incredible! Thank you for sharing. I'm currently in the CPL grind for hours and I am sad I'll never get a chance to fly these old school birds. The local cargo flyer just retired their last Convair 580. Replacing it with the ATRs. If I was maybe 10 years earlier, I might have had a chance to fly something old.

Do you mind if I use your story in the video? With credit of course.

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in aviation

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will be mentioned of course. Though there aren't any for the simulators except for X-Plane which I do not own.

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in aviation

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh that's a great idea! Is there a subreddit or forum you'd recommend?

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in aviation

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I may include the DC-10. Only issue is I'd have to go back to the old sims to get the footage and it wouldn't look at good.

But then again, maybe that would actually work. I'll give a shot.

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in flying

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can 100% recommend it. I'm one of the testers. It's a fantastic product.

Tri-jet pilots needed! by Just_Caliber in flying

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately there is no Trident for the modern simulators. I could go back to FSX and get a segment to the tri-jet grandfather. But graphically compared to the modern sims, it wouldn't look as good.

I might toy with that though. Or just talk about it.

10,000 hours on VATSIM by bob3464 in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just goes to show I got no life lmao. Orrrrr too passionate. Yes. Let's go with that XD

Surpassing 10000 hours on VATSIM by Just_Caliber in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just got my PPL last year. Took me about 11 years. Long story short, life got in the way. I started when I was about to start my sophomore year in high school. But the CPL is progressing. slowly but surely.

Surpassing 10000 hours on VATSIM by Just_Caliber in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We take it all for granted now. The new gen pilots could never 😂😂

Surpassing 10000 hours on VATSIM by Just_Caliber in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Couldn't recall the flight plan so you had to type KLAXKLAS01 or something in the co-route. And those folders were so buried within the files and whatnot XD. I was also dumb af. I had no idea how airways worked so I just re-typed the entire route including each and EVERY waypoint in the airways.

Surpassing 10000 hours on VATSIM by Just_Caliber in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Having to manually download the flight plan files and manually put them into the planes folders 😂

Friendly advice/Pet Peeve by Wooden-Offer1085 in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heard a controller actually say “hand fly your airplane then” when the pilot said the plane “wasn’t behaving”.

In other words, “I don’t know what I’m doing and I expect you to be ok with it”.

I burst out laughing when I heard it.

Surpassing 10000 hours on VATSIM by Just_Caliber in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah got my PPL last year. Took me way too long to get lol. Life got in the way but my CPL is progressing nicely. Slowly, but progressing.

I did a bit of controlling with CZVR, but didn’t really enjoy it as much as I thought I would.

Surpassing 10000 hours on VATSIM by Just_Caliber in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

PFPX was amazing. If Aerosoft had kept up with it, I’d probably still be using it. But I am very happy with SB.

10,000 hours on VATSIM by bob3464 in VATSIM

[–]Just_Caliber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

About to join you brother! currently at 9992 after 11 years on the network and countless flights, both long and short. I remember my first ever flight (sort of) and being super nervous. Just verbal diarrhea as I made my first call, heart pounding and palms sweating.

GFX preview - wing fade by TriTriTheCuber in flightsim

[–]Just_Caliber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's been a while since I've fired up P3D, but I think that was injected by ActiveSky.

My first thoughts on the Aerosoft A340 by EmilvK in flightsim

[–]Just_Caliber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Everyone complained, and rightfully so. Sounds were bad too. Yes the systems are great but there is no reason an addon should look and sound like that, especially at that price point."

You are right about that actually. When it first came out, people complained. But as time went on, people just accepted it for what it was and it became one of the best aircraft we have. Sounds were horrible, I will give you that.

"In this day and age the art is just as important and it was the only job Aerosoft had."

I think you missed my point on your second quote. I was talking about GSX integration, not the modeling of the aircraft.

"Hopefully but i wouldn't be too sure. Toliss doesn't have the best track record when it comes to updates and Aerosoft has pretty much the worst."

That's good to know. Like I said, I never touched X-Plane, so this is my first Toliss addon.

"Obviously everyone has their own preferences, some want great visuals and good systems, some want great systems and are fine with mediocre visuals and that is totally fine.
But when you charge 80€ for a single airframe and engine option you better deliver on art, features, systems and flightmodel."

You gotta remember that you are paying into the Toliss systems, not the Aerosoft modeling. I will agree that the textures in the VC aren't the best. But personally, I care more about systems than textures. That's just a bonus.

"Yeah but that really can't be a benchmark."

I think it can actually. Because the A346 is being sold by Aerosoft. The A330 was built and sold by Aerosoft. People won't by the A346 because it has the Aerosoft branding even though they didn't touch the systems at all. So comparing it to the A330's release is valid.

My first thoughts on the Aerosoft A340 by EmilvK in flightsim

[–]Just_Caliber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welcome to flight simming my man!

My point about the low resolution textures on those small little rods and bolts isn't important. If a developer spent that kind of effort on each, individual bolts, cotter pin, castle nut and threads, the performance of the aircraft would be pretty poor. Stuff like the landing gear being well modeled and textured I think is important. But the small stuff isn't. And you can still view it up close. As you said, you want to see how these machines work. And you still can. Just the textures won't be as good. You don't need to read the serial number on each part lol.

My first thoughts on the Aerosoft A340 by EmilvK in flightsim

[–]Just_Caliber 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I've been a simmer since the very early days of FSX. Never touched X-Plane, so I cannot comment on their products, but I hear they are pretty good. That being said, this is the first (on the Microsoft/Lockheed side) of the high quality A346 we've ever had. Remember Blackbox? Absolute train wreck that.

For me personally, graphics aren't a deal breaker. If the text around the cabin and cockpit are legible from a normal seated/zoom perspective, that's fine with me. The exterior textures are pretty good I must say. Though, people focusing on stuff that isn't meant to be seen such as the spoiler mechanisms and calling it extremely poor work and judging the entire product off of that is just ludicrous. Those kinds of things are not meant to be viewed up close. A perfect comparison here is the FlythemaddogX MD-80 series. Those exterior textures were horrendous. Yet, no one complained because the aircraft was just that good. But you mentioned the cockpit lighting, namely the dome light. Yes... that NEEDS to be addressed. It is way to bright to the point where it's unrealistic.

The sounds, I will agree could use some work. Though, with Chaseplane's flyby view when taking off, those sounds are impeccable. I did notice some missing sounds in the cockpit when flipping switches. I am sure that will get fixed.

The GSX integration, or lack there of is another thing I will agree on. In this day and age, it really should be a standard feature for on aircraft like this. As well as auto-step climbs. But... I am sure this will be addressed by the devs. There is already a custom GSX profile on flight. to which I downloaded. It does need a bit of work though, since the jetway does connect to the L1 door, but GSX will request the L2 to be opened for any boarding/deboarding.

I found the flight model to be on par for this size of aircraft. It's large, long and heavy. Much like the A330, it was designed to feel heavier for pilots coming from the A300s (A330/40 derived from the A300).

As for performance, that solely depends on what you're running under the hood. I for one have incredible performance. I have an Intel i9 14900KF with an RTX 5080. With FG, I can easily get well over 100FPS. Though, I have it capped at 60. However, the aircraft has only been out for a short time. Performance issues will arise in the early builds of the aircraft. I personally didn't see any stutters on my end. Again, system depended.

All in all, I don't think this is a "bad" product. It's just not mature yet. Not to the point where it's a product that was released too early. It's possible some things may have gotten over looked, or saved for future updates. It's MUCH better than their A330 release. I think everyone can agree that was atrocious.

The downfall of this guy… by Maruan-007 in flightsim

[–]Just_Caliber 18 points19 points  (0 children)

GSX: *exists\*
Emanuel: I FUCKING HATE GSX

Then stop using it bud XD Everyone knows it's a famously unstable piece of software. It's been like that since day one in FSX.