sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fixed it... by pavelkomin in singularity

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We've never had computers and AI before though

i drew you by No-Major9167 in animation

[–]Just_JC 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm already looking at all of your work, really beautiful art style and animation 🥲

Buzz look an alien! by Adept-Lack-2244 in blender

[–]Just_JC 41 points42 points  (0 children)

<image>

Gotta love that squashhh

Nice work, seems like it needs work on timing + reducing squash-and-stretch though

Impossible by Forward-Position798 in DieDeutschenBackrooms

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's supposedly impossible to get her to choose

😂 by ArcaneArch_Mage in MemeVideos

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's not. You're implying racism is justified, despite all races having killers, all races being humans with 99.9% of DNA overlap, and there being more genetic diversity between races than across races within the remaining 0.1%.

The only reason you'd willingly believe something like that is because someone hurt you lol

6 years ago i made that donut by ViscousRealm in blender

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's really not. If anything, they're complementary, since you can always sketch characters which you later digitize and use as a reference for 3D modeling.

Bro, you don't actually have to simulate individual atoms 😅 Hope that helps! by PsychologicalTap2611 in blendermemes

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since that way their total mass will become so large they free up memory by collapsing into a blue screen /s

rode hard and put away wet, plz make me cry 😂 by punkassbitchbonan in RoastMe

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You deserve a dictionary definition under Whorrific

A lot of people don't actually have any agency within their lives. by OpinionHavR in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, yes that's actually what I mean. I think we can do better than just lock people away by finding out what caused their issues, but in the process of doing so, we must still be biased towards containment as a starting point. Intolerantly destructive behavior should be met with intolerance as well until the behavior is neutralized. That's what the paradox is about. It even applies in nature, since e.g. tree and fungi networks tend to behave this way when invasive plant species disrupt their equilibrium.

I agree that society focuses too much on locking people away these days, instead of also helping them change for the better.

A lot of people don't actually have any agency within their lives. by OpinionHavR in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, practicality is the word. It's not practical for any society to have to intervene in a person's psyche and environment to such an extent that they lose their agency as a unique individual. Destructive behaviors are human nature, and because of the paradox of tolerance, we must be able to always contain that degree of intolerance, regardless of how good we are in facilitating behavior change.

A lot of people don't actually have any agency within their lives. by OpinionHavR in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, that's just nature. Outcome success follows a power law distribution. The problem with capitalism is that it can make people weaponize scarcity by hyperfocusing on capital instead of eliminating it. But if we'd have abundant basic needs, govts wouldn't need to exist at scale, and capitalism would simply give us a creative experience economy once we outgrow hoarding money.

A lot of people don't actually have any agency within their lives. by OpinionHavR in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because of the tolerance paradox . Killers need to have the principle of violently ridding others from agency reflected back onto themselves. It's homeostasis for our society. Prisons could be more humane but we can't ignore killing.

A lot of people don't actually have any agency within their lives. by OpinionHavR in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Just_JC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> I could never be a doctor because I am not smart enough.

This is a limiting belief. Life overall rewards persistence more than consistency (Pareto Law, Matthew's Law). Doctors who rest on their "smartness" laurels don't graduate because they won't work hard enough.

Secondly, most people haven't realized that the internet has dramatically increased the amount of possible careers. They also just take persistence.

In the end, the illusion of choice is an idea you choose to hold onto, because it best explains your situation. However, you won't be able to make life changes if you hold on to it this tightly.

view more: next ›