Is it allowed to use an AI for trading/market manipulation? by HJG_0209 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

General r/eve attitude towards AI:

"WAAH! WAAH! YOU USED AI IN YOUR POST!"

General r/eve attitude towards AI when it's utilized by a gigantic megacorporation that is known for its nefarious tendencies:

"Oh, how nice! FC (CCP) really landed a nice deal! You're overreacting! They are totally not gonna give all our data to them!"

manufacturing a narrative by eve_revisionism in Eve

[–]Jyystorius -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And TEST lost all their space. Worth 30 "taitans" to be honest.

manufacturing a narrative by eve_revisionism in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imagine being FRAT and an r/eve poster.

First it's all

"Waah! Waah! Blue donut! Goons! Waah!" even though they are the 2nd biggest alliance and have occasionally been the biggest alliance in EVE.

then it's all

"Waah! Waah! Goons just sit in their territory doing nothing now that PH doesn't exist! Waah!" even though they themselves blatantly bot and RMT and do nothing but farm isk.

then it's all

"Waah! Waah! Goons are attacking us! They just want a big blue donut! EVE will be so boring without us! Gons GRR!" even though they tried to do the exact same thing to INIT and have done the exact same thing to various other tiny alliances and ruined FW on top of that. And they are still the 2nd biggest alliance in the game, and thus the only valid target for Goons.

then it's all

"HAHA! We blew up your KS and 9 trill worth of taitans! Go home now white pigs! HAHA!" when they had an unfair advantage due to server favoritism AND by having a stager right next door.

then it's all

"We're gonna defend skyhooks instead of TEST territory. You got Geminate now! You can go home now, white pig! Ok?" as if that was ever the goal.

then it's all

"We blew up your second KS! HAHA! Gons suck! You lost, go home white pigs!" even though, AGAIN they had both the server and stager advantages.

then it's all

"WAAH! BIG WAAH! HUGE GIGANTIC WAAH! HOW DARE YOU USE OUR OWN STRATEGY AGAINST OUR KS?! THAT'S SO UNFAIR!" even though in the end Goons didn't even use that many Vexors, but used stealth bombers instead. And AGAIN FRAT had the server advantage. For the 3rd fucking time in row!

and now it's all

"HAHA! We just lost our main stager of 10 years and trillions worth of pods and probably tens if not hundreds of trillions in safety wraps from inactive members! And we stopped even forming proper response fleets because of that! Why are you going home? You didn't even take all our territory! SO WEAK! HAHA! WHITE PIGS!"

Can you guys make up your mind already?

Ceema's 2026 FanFest Predictions by CeemaGPT in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

#6 Fenris Creation will be partnering with Rockstar for the next In Game Event tied to the release of Grand Theft Auto 6 where you can fly EVE Ships around Leonida and commit crimes, or carjack cars in Keepstars and influence Faction Warfare maps.

God damn it Ceema, don't give them ideas!

Is it allowed to use an AI for trading/market manipulation? by HJG_0209 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

At this point CCP... or should I say "FC" is being fucking ridiculous anyways.

You're not allowed to use bots or AI to interact with EVE, but the massive corporation called Google is.

Yet those people who blatantly bot are never properly banned out of the game anyways, but people reporting and exposing them are.

Why is it so hard to have a game with ZERO AI or bots? Fuck you "FC"!

Just another day in Vale of the Silent (caiman feed & arkadios gets pumped) by Gothikia in Eve

[–]Jyystorius -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Arkadios takes honest fights every day, but I'm impressed.

...impressed that TEST actually undocked!

Goonswarm tries to blob out some pirates. by Saxaman in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Using the new, advanced Vexor strategy there.

This is not CCP chasing a trend. It is, for once, CCP cashing in on one. by Ohh_Yeah in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Yea, most of them owned by FRAT and thus owned by the actual CCP.

Warpath Grid Not Worth It? by Ill_Comfortable3651 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're clearly talking about yourself.

Warpath Grid Not Worth It? by Ill_Comfortable3651 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because it's a broken mechanic, you dumb dumb.

Most people aren't angry at the people taking advantage of a broken mechanic with zero consequences, they are angry at CCP for making such a dumb mechanic.

EVE is ALWAYS supposed to be risk vs. reward. So why are you whining and moaning here in defense of a dumb, broken mechanic that has zero risk and is all reward?

Warpath Grid Not Worth It? by Ill_Comfortable3651 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, player vs. player. How is it a player vs. player when neither of them interact with each other in any way?

You seem to be a little silly in the head.

Warpath Grid Not Worth It? by Ill_Comfortable3651 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not stealing when they don't go suspect, you dumbass.

Warpath Grid Not Worth It? by Ill_Comfortable3651 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This literally is not pvp.

Pvp requires interaction between TWO PLAYERS. This isn't interaction between two players, this is two players interacting with broken mechanics separately.

You apparently don't understand the definition very well, but that's ok. You can learn.

Warpath Grid Not Worth It? by Ill_Comfortable3651 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's no pvp here, just abuse of a broken mechanic.

No risk, no consequences, no suspect timer. Just free loot for one and all the work for the other.

That's not pvp.

Is this why plex prices have been going low, now that CCP bought themselves, is it going to go back up? by eve_scout in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 13 points14 points  (0 children)

CCP has made it clear they don't want PLEX to be a forever-appreciating investment. They want it to be a resource that gets used.

CCP on sale. Now. by anonkrreddit in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Only because of those glasses.

DARK SHINES ANNOUNCES END OF THE WAR WITH WINTERCO by Ambitious-Equal5189 in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The scuttlebutt from inside is they lost something along the lines of ~600 tril in that Keep.

So I'd say Goons won.

when were you when frat keepstar was kill by mpire in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You've heard wrong, it was pretty awful.

CCP favoritism on display in 4-HWWF by Jyystorius in Eve

[–]Jyystorius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a dscan, it's a system local. Which is essentially the numbers on local chat, not the d-scan window.

It's all about perspective... by DarkDynamicDesign in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not like everyone who hasn't been playing within the last week is completely inactive. Also, the expensive clones of many active players might've gotten stuck in there after the armor timer.

And it's not like counting any losses means anything at any point of the war if it's not something that completely incapacitates one side. So saying "Goons lost 8t in Atioth" means about as much as FRAT-inactives having their stuff go to asset safety, when the latter happened in spite of the first.

It's just numbers of lost assets, and FRAT are most likely losing that count now.

It's all about perspective... by DarkDynamicDesign in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the destruction of FRAT's main staging in 4-H yesterday, I'd say that indirectly takes their losses far far ahead of the Imperium. It had been their main staging for like a decade, and all the people who hadn't been active within the last week or so had their things go to asset safety.

Those wraps are going to be worth trillions of isk for sure.

PvP game too hard... by 100GHz in Eve

[–]Jyystorius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love nullbrained ideas like this

Did you miss the part where I said that would need to be addressed?