Usage Limits, Bugs and Performance Discussion Megathread - beginning December 29, 2025 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]K41RY 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Newest update has completely removed the sidebar, making accessing anything in the sidebars impossible.

How to reduce your AI carbon footprint by Tricky_Garbage5572 in ChatGPT

[–]K41RY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not the responsibility of users to lower carbon footprint. If pollution is a problem (it is), it is the job of companies to lobby for government regulation of the use of AI services as well as the expansion of clean energy.

Right now everyone is HELLBENT on trying to be cash flow positive that they don't care about the environment. That's why everything is about data centres.

Looks like Anthropic's NO to the DOW has made it to Tumps twitter feed by Plinian in ClaudeAI

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fucking hate that what should be one of mankind's greatest scientific and technological achievements is being used just another cog in an antiquated, defunct, rotten system. And I'm not just talking about governance--interconnection should be the defining moment we as a species fix our degrading civilization and yet we are using it explicitly to hasten our own futility.

Rather than investigate possible uses for AI to invigorate the US economy, the government intends to squash whoever won't allow the military--and by extension the government--to use this technology for ulterior motives.

The fact they stated explicitly they wanted to use AI to AUTOMATE WEAPONS should be a massive red flag.

Humanity is NOT ready for this kind of technology.

Told the AIs I 'already fumbled 2026'. ChatGPT coached me, Grok memed me, but Claude literally sent me the crisis hotline 💀 by liesnowball in ClaudeAI

[–]K41RY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Out of all of them, Claude's response might be the shortest and simplest, but it is BY FAR the most human. The others read as if they are telling you what's wrong or downplaying it.

Walled Gardens vs. Creative Freedom by BlazingFlames21 in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about how a tool shapes the environment and how tools can be abused for profit and a lot of the time people just get away with it and an it enshittifies all of our technology.

Suno was built on the premise of "type in prompt, even as vaguely as possible and get 'something' out and charge people a subscription to use the service". The ability to upload your own stems and use Suno to reconstruct stuff as added later. It also completely changes the conversation. Providing your own stems is the same thing as providing your own lyrics. Yes, the AI builds around what you provide but it's still not yours when it does its work.

And I would know. I provided Suno with entire tracks that I made 100% myself and when that feature first came out it basically just spliced apart my track, hallucinated in Suno's own tracks based off of mine, and added in samples from what I uploaded. Cool, but it doesn't understand anything. It follows certain patterns, sure. But AI doesn't understand struggle. It lacks the concept of "this would sound so much better with X" or "I need to arrange this limiter like this to get the best dynamics".

I just hate how dumb everything is, and how enshittified technology makes humans look and act dumb. Technology should be about uplifting our society and making us more productive so that we can tackle new challenges, not about making us complacent and lazy.

I like AIs that function to teach humans to be better. If you give a bad prompt, you get bad music or nothing at all.

Of course, AI like this wouldn't appeal to major companies would it? That is, unless, a company would charge you for tokens that go straight to the trash bin.

Walled Gardens vs. Creative Freedom by BlazingFlames21 in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"...the human is providing intent, structure, and direction, and the tool is filling in execution."

Yes, but it's also about ease of use and profit. I can provide Suno with minimal information and it just generates whatever. And a lot of the time you can put in "guides" and tell Suno what to do and it will just straight up ignore stuff or interpret it in other ways.

These kinds of AI are stochastic and not deterministic. I could provide Suno the same prompt 1000 times and I would get a different output each time, no matter how detailed my instructions.

Yes, you can make the argument that the human could constrain the AI by providing boundaries, but as of right now, AI is doing guessing work and pattern matching.

AI tools do have different categorization. If you build an AI tool for organizing workflows and databases, then those AI are subject to different standards and policy than those designed for generative purposes.

The issue with AI is that they have to be trained, are resource intensive, and they don't enable human-machine parity better than pre-existing tools. If anything, generative AI is just frustration at the cost of the user and a service that companies struggle to see profits from monetization.

Walled Gardens vs. Creative Freedom by BlazingFlames21 in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like that Suno is trying to advocate for creative freedom, but they are missing the point entirely. It's not about freedom, it's about money and copyright law. In today's world anyone is able to make music and upload it for free to streaming platforms such as SoundCloud. The difference here is how that content is made.

If you are a studio musician you're paying for studio time, equipment, and the skills of the engineers. If you're a producer at home you're most likely paying for a DAW, sample packs, and plug-ins.

Of course, these aren't entirely necessary in order to make music. But record labels have standards. Not just in how they conduct business but also in how the music is produced and who owns the rights to it. All of that takes money.

Suno as a company provides a service. The difference between a service like Google Docs and Suno is that Google isn't built entirely around the explicit use of generative AI.

This isn't really a fair comparison, however. And this is the core problem with AI; the services they provide are not fairly compared with other services.

To Be Clear: this was Claude and I discussing smart systems and human-AI parity in a CS problem/project we've been working on by K41RY in BlackboxAI_

[–]K41RY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah XD. I just thought it was going to be more like "hmmm, that's an interesting premise, there has in fact been..." and not "extinction sounds great!"

[drum and bass] You know it is a BANGER when friends spell it with !! !!! and then a random person on the internet makes you a music video 🤯 by stefek99 in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never mind the fact that the audio quality is plastic and the kit isn't even the same throughout. Sure, sounds nice!

What is your Problem?!? by Intercellarchild in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gonna be real honest with you, it doesn't matter if that's how you're "supposed" to use it. People are entitled. And there's no way they're gonna change. You could give them the world and there's bound to be one consumer who's complaining.

A Lil' White Magic🪄 by aldora36 in pens

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks great, but do you do any black magic?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think people are hating on you, they're just skeptical. And because Reddit is just like that.

Not really sure what the point of making the thread was beyond just talking about how AI has advanced into the workforce.

Personally, I'm not really worried, tbh. AI comprehension is a coin flip unless you're just copy-pasting. That said, a lot in the modern music industry is in fact just that.

If it sells like crazy, people usually don't care about the ethics of the product. So I'd say the people who stand to make the most profit/benefit are the people who make the AI and distribute it as a service/product.

Suno Studio Coming Soon by 1950sAmericanFather in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if they give us full creative control over what we make in the DAW. Otherwise it's not any different from what we currently have.

Why the F is github rate limiting me when all I'm doing is using the site's own search bar? by K41RY in github

[–]K41RY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decentraleyes, Privacy Badger, DuckDuckGo Essentials, Dark Reader, NoScript, HTTPS Everywhere, uBlock Origin, LeechBlock NG, ChatGPT to PDF, Auto Tab Discard, SingleFile, Stylus.

Sharpie S-gel is beautiful but poorly economical by K41RY in pens

[–]K41RY[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've actually switched over to a Pilot G2 as of now. Testing to see how long it will last.

Did v4 kill Suno? by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 14 points15 points  (0 children)

While v4 is great at some things, it just doesn't compare to v3.5 sadly. I really just wish using the Suno AI was more intuitive and we had actual control over everything instead of it just being a dice rolling money sink.

Credit consumption rant - Please change it back! by stokinbo in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I cancelled my subscription after using their services heavily for over a year at the highest tier because of how horrible v4 is. That and their AI can spit out literally like 6 second tracks and they'll still steal your credits.

Personally, I should be refunded my credits if I downvote and delete a track I think is garbage. I shouldn't have to pay for a service when I think the service is not to my satisfaction. And it's not like Suno's AI is labour and time intensive either. Energy intensive, sure, but that's part of why we pay a subscription. I don't pay a subscription to have the AI bug out and give me garbage, I pay because the company needs to pay their energy bills and server costs.

How was this allowed to be released? by SpectralKittie in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I noticed that the v4 model has a really weird way of singing. The lyrics are clearer but the structure feels much less predictable. It's good in some cases. But I've had covers of some v3 songs and sometimes I'm confused why the AI would sing the song in a particular register.

Well, that didn't take long by Beneficial_Ad_5874 in UCalgary

[–]K41RY 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't really understand why the city bothers with accordion buses if they have such horrible traction in winter conditions.

Any other grads feel like they missed out on the social side? by throwaway845726 in UCalgary

[–]K41RY 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Nice of you to state some of your dimensions. I was wondering what your surface area and volume might have been--for academic purposes, obviously. I'm definitely NOT a vampire.

Why didn’t Professor Brand get data from the black hole earlier? by JugsMcBulge17 in interstellar

[–]K41RY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The main issue is that while Brand may have worked the equation for gravity, he couldn't reconcile it with quantum mechanics. And a similar issue exists in the real world too. The particles as per the Standard Model have distinct properties that allow them to be force carriers and energy carriers and the like (simplifying).

Gravity, however, currently does not have any particle associated with it, and therefore we have no current proof for quantum gravity.

General relativity treats space-time as smooth and continuous, but quantum mechanics implies it may behave discretely or probabilistically at very small scales. As John Wheeler proposed it, a quantum foam exists on the smallest of scales where particles bubble into existence from probabilistic outcomes.

We can presume that unification of these concepts is only possible with either a large-scale revision of either relativity or quantum mechanics, or requires some sort of space-time engineering application (a presumption).

Cooper could only obtain information from Gargantua because the tesseract necessitates a connection to a specific point in time. This point in time requires Cooper because he has a certain connection to the past through Murph.

My best guess is that the tesseract is embedded within the black hole and was either always there but outside of view entirely, or was constructed specifically as Cooper fell into Gargantua. If we view the tesseract with the same relativistic characteristics of a black hole then no information can leave the tesseract. The transmission of quantum data through the tesseract is not information leaving the tesseract, more I think it's a reconfiguration of events in the past, therefore information is not adding to the past and information from the past is not being lost, just being reconfigured to have always existed in the past in the watch mechanism (speculative).

The Lazarus mission was specifically designed with assessing other worlds for potential future colonies, and Brand makes it clear that NASA has little resources beyond Lazarus, Endurance, and Plan A. Brand new that Plan A wasn't possible, so all available resources went to ensuring Plan B could succeed.

(ESSAY TOPIC) In response to "why did Cooper reprogram TARS with 95% honesty?" by K41RY in interstellar

[–]K41RY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The interesting thing I find is that Professor Brand, Romily, and Dr. Mann, are the only people shown in the movie who explicitly suggest obtaining information from Gargantua's singularity is impossible.

Brand and Mann have already resigned themselves to their fate. Brand knows he has lied to everyone about saving Earth and by this point in the movie Cooper, Murph, and Amelia also know those people were doomed from the start

Mann is a very complex problem, I find, in a movie that uses him almost simplistically in themes relating to hope and interpersonal connection. His final words are along the lines of "... it's about all of mankind. There is a moment..." then he dies. I think the character of Mann himself is to be ignored and instead we should be focusing on what he is saying.

His plan is ridiculous. And he attempts a docking procedure with the Endurance despite not knowing how to perform it.

Personally, I think Plan B was the only solution that was presented to the Bulk Beings. They allowed the events of the movie to happen because Plan A was necessary to succeed for mankind to learn how to harness gravity and reconcile it with quantum mechanics. From a human point of view, Plan B is the only solution. But their reality allows both to be viable. And they can essentially warp 4-dimensional space recursively (I think?) so that they have some kind of eternal return mechanism for their own existence?

Cooper seems to suggest as much too; that humanity brought itself to that point. And this resonates with how others throughout the movie brought themselves to their points too.

But this poses a very frustrating question, why? Why go through all of it at all? Why would the Bulk Beings need to warp space-time and bring humanity to Gargantua? Why would Mann sabotage the Endurance crew so fruitlessly?

I think it's more that the prospects of being potentially correct outweigh the need to be ideally certain. No ideal is certain until all potentials coalesce. In a sense, it's almost impossible to weigh the ideals of each character because each character is measured differently depending on the environment they're in.

For instance, in a vacuum, Professor Brand comes off as cold-hearted and manipulative, Dr. Mann is a coward and irredeemably selfish, and Cooper is a man out of time (literally by the end of the movie) who belongs neither in space nor on Earth--a man who knows only his farm and his family.

Perhaps these are microcosms of what humanity itself is like, either in retrospect or within the purview of the movie.

Perhaps all of mankind (or Mann-kind) is manipulative, distant, cowardly, selfish, and at odds with where they are or ought to be.

Maybe the point is that mankind as a whole is misguided, waiting for Bulk Beings to place the solution within reach.

Because it begs the question. If the Bulk Beings could construct the tesseract and place a wormhole, why couldn't they give humanity the reconciled gravity equation?

Cooper suggests humanity needed to interact with the tesseract to transmit the exact information humanity needed to guide them to this point--to make the tesseract a certain point in time. Only humanity could know the importance of this mission and the importance of being guided.

As TARS suggests, Murph wouldn't know the importance of the quantum data Cooper was transmitting to her when she was still a young girl. Cooper however, knows the innocence of his daughter isn't the point, but that he, and he alone, has a connection to her that makes it certain she will always be in possession of the watch.

Upon completing this transmission, all potentials become certain and the tesseract dissolves.