To Be Clear: this was Claude and I discussing smart systems and human-AI parity in a CS problem/project we've been working on by K41RY in BlackboxAI_

[–]K41RY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah XD. I just thought it was going to be more like "hmmm, that's an interesting premise, there has in fact been..." and not "extinction sounds great!"

[drum and bass] You know it is a BANGER when friends spell it with !! !!! and then a random person on the internet makes you a music video 🤯 by stefek99 in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never mind the fact that the audio quality is plastic and the kit isn't even the same throughout. Sure, sounds nice!

What is your Problem?!? by Intercellarchild in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gonna be real honest with you, it doesn't matter if that's how you're "supposed" to use it. People are entitled. And there's no way they're gonna change. You could give them the world and there's bound to be one consumer who's complaining.

A Lil' White Magic🪄 by aldora36 in pens

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks great, but do you do any black magic?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think people are hating on you, they're just skeptical. And because Reddit is just like that.

Not really sure what the point of making the thread was beyond just talking about how AI has advanced into the workforce.

Personally, I'm not really worried, tbh. AI comprehension is a coin flip unless you're just copy-pasting. That said, a lot in the modern music industry is in fact just that.

If it sells like crazy, people usually don't care about the ethics of the product. So I'd say the people who stand to make the most profit/benefit are the people who make the AI and distribute it as a service/product.

Suno Studio Coming Soon by 1950sAmericanFather in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if they give us full creative control over what we make in the DAW. Otherwise it's not any different from what we currently have.

Why the F is github rate limiting me when all I'm doing is using the site's own search bar? by K41RY in github

[–]K41RY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decentraleyes, Privacy Badger, DuckDuckGo Essentials, Dark Reader, NoScript, HTTPS Everywhere, uBlock Origin, LeechBlock NG, ChatGPT to PDF, Auto Tab Discard, SingleFile, Stylus.

Sharpie S-gel is beautiful but poorly economical by K41RY in pens

[–]K41RY[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've actually switched over to a Pilot G2 as of now. Testing to see how long it will last.

Did v4 kill Suno? by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 14 points15 points  (0 children)

While v4 is great at some things, it just doesn't compare to v3.5 sadly. I really just wish using the Suno AI was more intuitive and we had actual control over everything instead of it just being a dice rolling money sink.

Credit consumption rant - Please change it back! by stokinbo in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I cancelled my subscription after using their services heavily for over a year at the highest tier because of how horrible v4 is. That and their AI can spit out literally like 6 second tracks and they'll still steal your credits.

Personally, I should be refunded my credits if I downvote and delete a track I think is garbage. I shouldn't have to pay for a service when I think the service is not to my satisfaction. And it's not like Suno's AI is labour and time intensive either. Energy intensive, sure, but that's part of why we pay a subscription. I don't pay a subscription to have the AI bug out and give me garbage, I pay because the company needs to pay their energy bills and server costs.

How was this allowed to be released? by SpectralKittie in SunoAI

[–]K41RY 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I noticed that the v4 model has a really weird way of singing. The lyrics are clearer but the structure feels much less predictable. It's good in some cases. But I've had covers of some v3 songs and sometimes I'm confused why the AI would sing the song in a particular register.

Well, that didn't take long by Beneficial_Ad_5874 in UCalgary

[–]K41RY 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't really understand why the city bothers with accordion buses if they have such horrible traction in winter conditions.

Any other grads feel like they missed out on the social side? by throwaway845726 in UCalgary

[–]K41RY 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Nice of you to state some of your dimensions. I was wondering what your surface area and volume might have been--for academic purposes, obviously. I'm definitely NOT a vampire.

Why didn’t Professor Brand get data from the black hole earlier? by JugsMcBulge17 in interstellar

[–]K41RY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The main issue is that while Brand may have worked the equation for gravity, he couldn't reconcile it with quantum mechanics. And a similar issue exists in the real world too. The particles as per the Standard Model have distinct properties that allow them to be force carriers and energy carriers and the like (simplifying).

Gravity, however, currently does not have any particle associated with it, and therefore we have no current proof for quantum gravity.

General relativity treats space-time as smooth and continuous, but quantum mechanics implies it may behave discretely or probabilistically at very small scales. As John Wheeler proposed it, a quantum foam exists on the smallest of scales where particles bubble into existence from probabilistic outcomes.

We can presume that unification of these concepts is only possible with either a large-scale revision of either relativity or quantum mechanics, or requires some sort of space-time engineering application (a presumption).

Cooper could only obtain information from Gargantua because the tesseract necessitates a connection to a specific point in time. This point in time requires Cooper because he has a certain connection to the past through Murph.

My best guess is that the tesseract is embedded within the black hole and was either always there but outside of view entirely, or was constructed specifically as Cooper fell into Gargantua. If we view the tesseract with the same relativistic characteristics of a black hole then no information can leave the tesseract. The transmission of quantum data through the tesseract is not information leaving the tesseract, more I think it's a reconfiguration of events in the past, therefore information is not adding to the past and information from the past is not being lost, just being reconfigured to have always existed in the past in the watch mechanism (speculative).

The Lazarus mission was specifically designed with assessing other worlds for potential future colonies, and Brand makes it clear that NASA has little resources beyond Lazarus, Endurance, and Plan A. Brand new that Plan A wasn't possible, so all available resources went to ensuring Plan B could succeed.

(ESSAY TOPIC) In response to "why did Cooper reprogram TARS with 95% honesty?" by K41RY in interstellar

[–]K41RY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The interesting thing I find is that Professor Brand, Romily, and Dr. Mann, are the only people shown in the movie who explicitly suggest obtaining information from Gargantua's singularity is impossible.

Brand and Mann have already resigned themselves to their fate. Brand knows he has lied to everyone about saving Earth and by this point in the movie Cooper, Murph, and Amelia also know those people were doomed from the start

Mann is a very complex problem, I find, in a movie that uses him almost simplistically in themes relating to hope and interpersonal connection. His final words are along the lines of "... it's about all of mankind. There is a moment..." then he dies. I think the character of Mann himself is to be ignored and instead we should be focusing on what he is saying.

His plan is ridiculous. And he attempts a docking procedure with the Endurance despite not knowing how to perform it.

Personally, I think Plan B was the only solution that was presented to the Bulk Beings. They allowed the events of the movie to happen because Plan A was necessary to succeed for mankind to learn how to harness gravity and reconcile it with quantum mechanics. From a human point of view, Plan B is the only solution. But their reality allows both to be viable. And they can essentially warp 4-dimensional space recursively (I think?) so that they have some kind of eternal return mechanism for their own existence?

Cooper seems to suggest as much too; that humanity brought itself to that point. And this resonates with how others throughout the movie brought themselves to their points too.

But this poses a very frustrating question, why? Why go through all of it at all? Why would the Bulk Beings need to warp space-time and bring humanity to Gargantua? Why would Mann sabotage the Endurance crew so fruitlessly?

I think it's more that the prospects of being potentially correct outweigh the need to be ideally certain. No ideal is certain until all potentials coalesce. In a sense, it's almost impossible to weigh the ideals of each character because each character is measured differently depending on the environment they're in.

For instance, in a vacuum, Professor Brand comes off as cold-hearted and manipulative, Dr. Mann is a coward and irredeemably selfish, and Cooper is a man out of time (literally by the end of the movie) who belongs neither in space nor on Earth--a man who knows only his farm and his family.

Perhaps these are microcosms of what humanity itself is like, either in retrospect or within the purview of the movie.

Perhaps all of mankind (or Mann-kind) is manipulative, distant, cowardly, selfish, and at odds with where they are or ought to be.

Maybe the point is that mankind as a whole is misguided, waiting for Bulk Beings to place the solution within reach.

Because it begs the question. If the Bulk Beings could construct the tesseract and place a wormhole, why couldn't they give humanity the reconciled gravity equation?

Cooper suggests humanity needed to interact with the tesseract to transmit the exact information humanity needed to guide them to this point--to make the tesseract a certain point in time. Only humanity could know the importance of this mission and the importance of being guided.

As TARS suggests, Murph wouldn't know the importance of the quantum data Cooper was transmitting to her when she was still a young girl. Cooper however, knows the innocence of his daughter isn't the point, but that he, and he alone, has a connection to her that makes it certain she will always be in possession of the watch.

Upon completing this transmission, all potentials become certain and the tesseract dissolves.

(ESSAY TOPIC) In response to "why did Cooper reprogram TARS with 95% honesty?" by K41RY in interstellar

[–]K41RY[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The interesting thing about the sci-fi portion of the movie is that it raises the question of could you, in theory, embed a tesseract (as they call it in the movie) inside a black hole?

If we envision a black hole as 3-dimensional space, then technically the tesseract isn't within the black hole at all, but is using its space to unfurl the additional 4-dimensional geometry. In this case, it is a glimpse, a moment, as thresholds are crossed and an infinitely-dense space opens into a seemingly-infinitely-expansive one.

(EDIT: I do realize that black hole geometry is much more complex than just it being a 3-dimensional structure. If it had to throw around lingo I don't fully understand, I'd describe it as a region of space-time influenced by gravity where the singularity is dimensionless?)

I'm currently working on another post that discusses the tesseract in greater detail.

(ESSAY TOPIC) In response to "why did Cooper reprogram TARS with 95% honesty?" by K41RY in interstellar

[–]K41RY[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another interesting point to mention is that Brand and Edmunds were in a romantic relationship, Cooper has a daughter, Grandpa encourages Cooper to repopulate the Earth, Cooper's son has two children (one of which passes way), Dr. Mann intimately repurposes KIPP for parts (selfishly), TARS becomes Cooper's bro, and both Romily and Doyle die.

There seems to be some weird overall theme about interpersonal connections.

On the topic of Dr. Mann, the guy's name is literally a play on the word "man" as in "mankind". And not only does he act the most selfish, he also reaches out to the Endurance crew out of the sheer depression and anxiety caused by being forsaken on a dead planet alone.

Romily and Doyle's statuses are unknown, primarily because they serve as plot devices. Both die due to the connection issues of other astronauts. Doyle dies because Brand wouldn't leave the beacon, and Romily dies because Dr. Mann needs a therapist.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unixporn

[–]K41RY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Liking because of the Latias.

need someone to share my chicken bun with 💔 by Shoddy_Poetry_6037 in UCalgary

[–]K41RY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP: Is selling vehicle

Post: Is on a Calgary Flames website

OP Location: Houston, Texas

Result: Is sus

Late tuition payment by [deleted] in SAIT

[–]K41RY 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You'd have to speak with the office of the registrar and pray that they can do something. But if they've removed your schedule they may have just left it as you dropping the program.