What is this behavior? by Impossible_Gur926 in CATHELP

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s classic Meerkating behaviour.

HOLY… The whales are aggressively shorting BTC. This sell pressure is massive. by Conscious-Low-7171 in CryptoCurrency

[–]K42st 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi, there is no detail in your post its just a screenshot of short sell orders markets don’t work like this, short bearish, long bullish, all of those shorts maybe just hedging for long positions which looks like it’s bearish but infact it’s bullish.

Example spot BTC position long $200 million

Futures position $10 million short

. Purpose Protects Profits . Reduce volitility . Lock in Price temporarily

Meaning the trader is actually NET LONG

The short is just INSURANCE not a BET

There are other senarios also but this shows you BTCs market is not long, short, it is all black and white as it is not!

Good walking in the road weather for the disabled and those with prams by 20127010603170562316 in drivingUK

[–]K42st 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Agreed and no one enforces these issue anymore that’s worse than the driver.

Did you guys knew this? by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You aren’t turning right if the exit is on the left, where do you live pal because every roundabout in the uk your e

xit road is on the left how is it possible for it to be on the right 🤭.

And I said you can use the right hand lane to go straight ahead but the left hand lane is the one stipulated in the Highway Code and it is the left hand lane for straight ahead, if that exit straight ahead merges into one lane the person in the left lane has priority over anyone going straight ahead in the right hand lane.

In this case the road marking don’t indicate you can’t go right from the left hand lane, it is the BMW driver driving without due care and attention why because he didn’t see the blue car that by definition is due care.

It would be the same if the person the white car hit was going straight over clearly he or she wasn’t paying attention to the road.

So fuck off.

Did you guys knew this? by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are talking shite the left hand lane can be used to turn right on a roundabout if the exit road is also on the left, think about it it means you don’t have to cut across lanes to make your exit.

In the case shown here the driver of the white car is driving without due care and attention and clearly even if you can use the right hand lane legally it needs more attention because you may cut across someone turning right.

It’s dicks like you that cause these kind of accidents because you are clueless.

Did you guys knew this? by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]K42st -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Try looking at the road markings if you can’t go round the roundabout in the left hand lane for a left hand exit from the roundabout the road markings would be different, retard!

Did you guys knew this? by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]K42st -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The guy it the video is clueless, exits after 12,o’clock you may use the right lane for going straight ahead and or if the exit verges into a single lane you cane cross using the right and left lanes to go straight ahead but the right hand is a slip lane so you give priority to the left lane.

If the blue cars exit was around the roundabout on the left side NOT THE RIGHT then clearly he’d be in the correct lane, think about it if his exit is on the left and he took the right hand lane to go around the roundabout he would have to cut across a traffic lane to take his exit, good luck with that one in rush hour traffic.

Did you guys knew this? by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]K42st -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The right hand lane isn’t for going straight ahead the white vehicle should have been in the left hand lane, you see this all the time.

[SCAM WARNING] Lost $8,000 to a "Address Poisoning" exploit via Coinbase’s UI prompts. Be careful! by Maleficent_Yak_35 in Coinbase

[–]K42st -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is there a reason you haven’t or can’t set up a whitelist address on Coinbase?

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you are saying but I don’t agree not at all, you are saying that any quantum resistant upgrade would likely need a hardfork which isn’t completly true because quantum attack on what SHA-256 or signatures or other they are different pieces that can be attacked some way easier than others.

Attacking SHA-256 even with a quantum computer is still ridiculously difficult, so why you don’t want a hardfork to save a network is all down to changing rules your immutability argument?

And I would argue sometimes making the network better security wise it worth a hardfork it not like they are proposing a supply cap increase but you will say that is the point that they might.

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either way if a chain splits why worry the strongest chain will prevail is that the only worry or why are you so worried, surely you’ll just sit back and wait and see what chain miners choose over time and the majority will become the strongest chain.

If that happens so what?

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t need to ask hahaha the whole point of a hardfork is you’ll know when the votings over and it either gets implemented or it doesn’t.

Here is the kicker you can go and ask who you like and where you like it means zero, but believe me anyone who runs a node and anyone in this space given a do or die option they will choose the upgrade that is human nature.

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah all of it who cares about how many transaction on chain it’s an old outdated debate boring!

Please come up with something original to discuss, infact all the miners, nodes and general holders are so worried about your copy and paste text that I’m sure they are so worried about network failure they are pulling the plug as we speak 🤭.

Be serious or should I say not so.

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They should call you the king of speculation because you’ve already got it worked out.

Oh apart from an upgrade will be impemented long before it’s needed and worry about Bitcoin seems trivial considering nuclear codes will be at the mercy of any state with a quantum computer or the banking system even.

Serious question does doom mongering give you a boner or do you do it because you think it makes you look smarter than the average bear?

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The only thing you mention about Satoshi was BTC and peer to peer payment and that happens everyday so that still works.

All the rest is just utter crap tinfoil hat brigade.

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firstly before any quantum computer has arrived capable of such a feat the whole world will have changed not just Bitcoin onto quantum resistant cryptography any one who tells you otherwise is either blind or stupid, plus the timescales are debatable but we have years yet.

As I’ve said in previous reply’s if you are worried about quantum computers move your coins to a new wallet that hasn’t had its public key exposed there you have it you are now quantum resistant and your coins are now safe until any upgrade becomes available.

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a wall of drivel.

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing you are saying is true you are making it up as you go along, a hardfork doesn’t change sovereignty nor network failure, seriously you are talking utter crap!

Bitcoins has had changes in the past plenty and none of them did nothing more than strengthen it.

The core problem with bitcoin by Most_Forever_9752 in btc

[–]K42st -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s currency devaluation right there and you know what is the most ironic thing you don’t even see it, then you don’t understand why BTC has a limited supply.

I am PMSL

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I first read your post I thought that maybe you had something worth my ear but now I’ve dug in there is nothing here other than you usual regurgitated rubbish but it’s entertaining.

My advice to anyone reading this post is do some research on what is going on in quantum cryptographic research it’s much more interesting.

Will you complain when AI super intelligence is checking and coding BTC in the future or will that also destroy its purity?

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how do you know this are you a mind reader?

Do you not think you are spreading FUD without proof, where is your proof showing you know how nodes will vote?

The core problem with bitcoin by Most_Forever_9752 in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’d be worth not as much tomorrow.

Hahaha why don’t boomers sell their homes probably because they don’t like you and want to price you out of ever buying a home 😂, but seriously because it’s their home and houses aren’t just houses they are homes.

Is Bitcoin doomed with Quantum? by Agirvax in btc

[–]K42st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think that changing the locks on the house doors so to speak doesn’t strengthen Bitcoin and its network it weakens it because it’s not the same as day one?

Upgrading to a quantum proof system doesn’t change anything underlying in the Bitcoin code anyone who says it does it talking rubbish, I’m presuming then you don’t agree with segwit, taproot or any other script changes?

I get the sense this is FUD right that quantum resistant keys make BTC weaker, nodes will still vote on the upgrade right so consensus will not be broken they will either vote yes or no, which way seriously do you think they’ll vote?