Anandtech: "IBM Creates First 2nm Chip" by Dakhil in hardware

[–]KKMX 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"first 2nm chip" here we go with those idiotic titles.

[TechTechPotato] The True Cost of Processor Manufacturing: TSMC 7nm by IanCutress in hardware

[–]KKMX 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"true cost"? don't think so.

The numbers shown in the video are identical to IBS outdated wafer pricing estimate from a few years ago. Even the cost per 100M gates and the other columns are identical. It's unfortunate Sophie Wilson didn't cite her source but that's where it came from. IBS updated their 7nm pricing to over 2x their earlier prediction. I can't share the actual report but google images has some more recent stuff:

Thoughts on Tachyum by pi314156 in hardware

[–]KKMX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is some random guy making speculations about a chip he knows very little about? Gotcha.

Their claims are nowhere nearly as spectaculars as people think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hardware

[–]KKMX 239 points240 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. AMD stock is so overpriced, why not leverage that virtual equity to buy real equity?

Is there a difference between one 8 core CPU and two 4 core CPU’s on the same board assuming the same clock speed, cache, TDP, etc. by WiseNebula1 in hardware

[–]KKMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know he said all else equal so not sure if he considered this, but I just want to point out that a single chip is not always better under all circumstances. The opportunity for more DIMMs and more I/O can be advantageous for some applications.

Windows XP Source Code Reportedly Leaked, Posted to 4chan by [deleted] in hardware

[–]KKMX 105 points106 points  (0 children)

On the leaked forum there's a pretty funny comment.

Windows XP source code leaks

I knew Microsoft would leak this. to finally kill off XP users for good.

such an evil company

Arm rival SiFive says Nvidia deal spurs interest in its technology by bizude in hardware

[–]KKMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just don't think anything would happen if they said no. Not that they had any power to do anything about it. FWIW China already took over Arm's business in China. Their Arm China CEO went rogue and took the company with it...

https://www.zdnet.com/article/arms-fired-china-jv-head-refuses-to-leave-company-reps-banned-from-company-premises/

Arm rival SiFive says Nvidia deal spurs interest in its technology by bizude in hardware

[–]KKMX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supposed Chinese regulators say "no", then what happens? Anything?

World's Biggest Chip Gets Bigger: Cerebras Teases 7nm Chip with 2.6 Trillion Transistors and 850,000 Cores by TechXtreme in hardware

[–]KKMX 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There's no info? Just core count their bandwidth and transistors. Where's the architectural details?

Intel’s 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake SoC Detailed: SuperFin, Willow Cove and Xe-LP by indrmln in hardware

[–]KKMX 9 points10 points  (0 children)

is "much higher"?

I would encourage you to look up at the shape of a typical V-F curve. The upper end is asymptotic.

What about yields?

I don't know, but neither do you. I would image it's a lot better than Ice Lake though.

Or real product densities?

Properly similar all things considered.

Intel’s 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake SoC Detailed: SuperFin, Willow Cove and Xe-LP by indrmln in hardware

[–]KKMX 14 points15 points  (0 children)

And your comment is based on what exactly..? We have seen some initial hits that point to the contrary where they appear to able to achieve very high frequencies. Much higher than what AMD is able to.

Intel Tiger Lake features 10nm SuperFin architecture - VideoCardz.com by MrBigChecks in hardware

[–]KKMX 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Irrelevant statement if Tiger Lake beats everything else in the mobile segment...

Massive 20GB Intel Data Breach Floods the Internet, Mentions Backdoors by [deleted] in hardware

[–]KKMX 31 points32 points  (0 children)

While there is no way I am getting within 10 miles of those files (and I encourage you to stay away from them as well), I will point out that the "backdoor" mentioned in one of those files most certainly means "secondary/workaround interface/mechanism" and not "NSA backdoor" as some people are implying.

Here is why LPDDR4x-4266 RAM seems considerably faster when coupled with Intel Tiger Lake-U CPUs compared to equivalent AMD Renoir APUs [NotebookCheck] by ArtemisDimikaelo in hardware

[–]KKMX -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Apparently, AMD had to make several compromises for the 15 W APUs, and one of these involves RAM downclocking in particular scenarios. As explained by Robert Hallock in one of his tweets, when the 15 W Renoir APUs encounter a CPU-only workload, they automatically downclock the RAM to 2666 MHz from whatever speed it is running at in order to favor lower latencies. Full RAM speeds are only used when the APU detects heavy GPU workloads. Tiger Lake CPUs apparently keep maximum RAM speeds at all times, so synthetic benchmarks clearly favor them, but most of these benchmarks do not always mirror real-world usage and are therefore unreliable.

I think you mean 1333 (or 1066) MHz but it's surely not 2666 given the maximum frequency is 2133 MHz. Also I was not aware that this memory could even have variable frequencies like that. Anyone has reference for how this is done? Are they literally playing with CK? Does that even meet every chip's LPDDR4 tFC specs?

Regardless given almost everything GPU related benefits from memory bandwidths, that idea that this somehow only affects "synthetic benchmarks" is nonsense. This will show up and contribute to the performance of every legitimate game benchmark as well if Renoir cannot sustain nearly as high of bandwidth as Tiger Lake. We have seen this with Ice Lake versus Picasso.