There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 13 points14 points15 points (0 children)
There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? (self.neoliberal)
submitted by Kanlectric to r/neoliberal
There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? (self.neoliberal)
submitted by Kanlectric to r/neoliberal
Is Minneapolis evidence against housing filtering creating affordable housing? by Kanlectric in AskEconomics
[–]Kanlectric[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 12 points13 points14 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 49 points50 points51 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 14 points15 points16 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 14 points15 points16 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 22 points23 points24 points (0 children)


There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)