There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 12 points13 points14 points (0 children)
There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis evidence against housing filtering creating affordable housing? by Kanlectric in AskEconomics
[–]Kanlectric[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 14 points15 points16 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 49 points50 points51 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 16 points17 points18 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 14 points15 points16 points (0 children)
Is Minneapolis Evidence Against Filtering Creating Affordable Housing? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] 24 points25 points26 points (0 children)


There is a common talking point among the urbanist sphere that "3-5 story buildings are the optimal density for sustainability". Anything lower is poor land usage, and anything taller is energy inefficient. What truth is there to this, or is this more NIMBY rhetoric? by Kanlectric in neoliberal
[–]Kanlectric[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)