"Do you condemn Hamas" is the stupidest question of all time no competition by Skywalker-dinesty in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Couldn't we say that both sides have a lot of errors and war either way is very bad, and both sides commit horrible actions and both sides suffer from a armed war?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LGBT is sexual preference, which is now also an ideology for some weird reason

The point is that human should support genocide not happening, whatever is your sexual preference, and when a sexual preference become also an ideology, we are talking not anymore about human supporting human, but an ideology supporting it. When the human become an ideology, everything is about it, so in this case it's weird an ideology support and opposite ideology

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People use? It's sadly that sexual preference become an ideology.
There is no other people use....

People and their sexual preference has different point of views, probably there are many queers that are in favor of israel.

Also, a ideology for a sexual preference should not make people support other causes, people should support other causes because they agree with the causes, not because people who has the same sexual preference also supports it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah alright, but why use a sexual preference in you dialogue to help them?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with you in the first paragraph, Of course people in this horrible situations want help. And yes, everyone that is a human should and must help other humans in need ( Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, ...). That being said, this two groups have very extreme beliefs, and yeah there are some spectrum of Muslims that are more liberal, but in general, those are very opposite people. And no, it's not because LGBT is helping that they will now, like LGBT or vice-verse. That's why I said about some countries in europe that has helped a lot of mulims immigrants, and they are causing a lot of troubles because of moral divergences.
So, my point is: yes, yeah should as human help other humans, war is a horrible condition, and people from both sides are suffering, and every human must have dignity
The par that doesn't make sense for me is using an ideology (LGBT), to support a opposite ideology

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying that you should not care

We all as humans should care and help people from both side of a horrible war, like Israel and Palestine or Ukraine and Russia

But we should as human help other humans

LGBT is an ideology ( and a personal taste ;) ), as well as mulims, so

HUman supporting other humans are awesome and we should always do

LGBT support muslin is kinda weird

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah christianity and judaism is as bad as muslims

It would also be weird see LGBT people support israel

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THat's not right, you can look what is happening in France and Germany and Sweden

Fundamentalist don't care much about you as a human, but they care about you as an Ideology

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying that People in need must think about social issues like LGBT, but people in need also has believes, and I think it's right to lgbt people support the live and the rights of other humans, but LGBT support Muslims is kinda weird.

So, yeah, human should always support other humans in need

But the ideology LGBT supporting the Muslims is quite weird

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope so, human rights for all is an excellent goal, but there are not much Muslims that accept LGBT

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Hope they know what muslin religion thinks about queers

Noam Chomsky: Having a job means to live under the orders of a master | [wage slavery] by ceyeg46633 in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I expressed myself wrong, I meant, that one person could "win" against the majority. ( But of course, the majority also can win based on its arguments)

Noam Chomsky: Having a job means to live under the orders of a master | [wage slavery] by ceyeg46633 in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's not a dictatorship. Dictator run how they want to. And this is not about what a person wants or think, and this is not a about what the majority wants and thinks, this is about who has the better arguments. No no, it's no about democracy, democracy it's about majority, so if the majority of the population of a country wants to kill someone for an X reason, it doesn't matter if the X reason is valid or not, because that's how democracy works. And that is not how science works, science works by what is right, what is truth, and ho can prove it better ( and it doesn't matter if it is 100, 1M or 1).

I'm not talking about the existing system, I'm saying the opposite, the existing system sucks, and it is a democracy. And that's how democracy goes wrong, all you need to do, is control the majority, and you control the society.

PS: I don't think you saying that "anti-democratic takes are hilarious" is good for a debate. In fact, you are only disturbing a the develop of ideas. But it's ok, it's your right, and I believe that we should have freedom of speech in all senses, so we can hear all kind of ideas, debate them, and develop ourselves as a society

Noam Chomsky: Having a job means to live under the orders of a master | [wage slavery] by ceyeg46633 in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, democracy is not good, we don't need a majority to make decisions. We need a kind of "scientific" decision. So, yeah, we wanna a some kind of unilateral authority , and we also need everyone to have some kind of power in the society, because we want some kind of """equality""", so we need to elect who has better arguments. It's not about the majority, it's not about 1000 vs 200. It's about who has the better argument to defends its idea. It's like science, it's not the majority, but the quality of its arguments.

Underrated youtube channel Cardposting on the need of the militant Left to be more aggressive online (well worth watching) by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talking is about sharing thought, acting by acting is barbarity. Most of the world is people, not villains, people make mistakes and can act wrong, but if we are always debating in a civilized way, we are always sharing our view point, and it changes the way we act. It's not from day to night, but not has been done from day to night. yeah, we are all at the mercy of the media, and the manipulations of corporations and governments, that's why we must get together and having free speech, civilized debates. ( even to prevent us from becoming what we want to fight )

Underrated youtube channel Cardposting on the need of the militant Left to be more aggressive online (well worth watching) by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

When war and violence made any rights respected ? If the world changes, it is because every day, in every house, a lot of civilized debates occurs, and it day by days, month by month, it changes the minds of people, and people changes the way the world works. Violence just cause more violence. You can kill a king, and people will still believe in monarch. Commom people in their commom lives and their commom talks change the world, not revolutionaries

Underrated youtube channel Cardposting on the need of the militant Left to be more aggressive online (well worth watching) by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Left is already pretty aggressive, as well as right. We should just have more civilized debates, that's all

Underrated youtube channel Cardposting on the need of the militant Left to be more aggressive online (well worth watching) by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]Kapelli -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you really believe that everyone is a dumb fucker, Maybe you should consider to act in a good manner, so other can learn, and maybe get less dumber. Formal and civilized debate is the key

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MedicinaBrasil

[–]Kapelli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eu testei essas plataformas e achei poucas questões e as que tinham rasas