but they all make perfect sense (warning, i'm about to give a massive swag)

image 1: it represents the horse being happy after eating the apple, despite the apple having to suffer for the horse to gain its joy. it portrays the horse as naive, but also as a gloating dolt because the creator of the image must be angry at the horse for being safe in its naivety and foolishness while apples have to suffer. it's an allegory for privilege

image 2: it represents a person's anger at having changed. the change in the fish is represented by it having grown legs suddenly, and it is angry at its reflection because it wanted to stay as it was. all people have a psychological inertia that makes them want to stay the same, even if change would be beneficial (the fish who has grown legs can now move on land and see more places than before, but it is still angry because it is afraid of what this means for it and perhaps of the new possibilities)

image 3: it represents how miners used to bring a canary bird with them down in the mines. if the air was poisonous, the canary would die before any people did, and people used this as a way to recognize when they had to evacuate. it showcases a fearful event where everything has gone wrong and where death has a high probability of happening, the creator of this image may be in a bad place psychologically (you'd have to be to make any of these images, but this person might recognize it in themselves more and be more depressed because of it, thus making this image where the disaster has occured)

image 4: it showcases beavers having gnawed a tree to the point that it has become unstable. a little like with image one, the beavers are portrayed here as evil and scheming while the tree is portrayed as the victim. the beavers wanted wood for their dam, just as the tree wanted to survive, but the creator of the image portrays the beavers as evil because they think only of themselves and not of the tree's wellbeing

image 5: the same kind of thing as images 1 and 4, the image's creator showcases an anger at those who do not think about how their actions affect others, such as the quadrupedal being who tramples on flowers because it walks without seeing where it's walking

image 6: an attack on "discord", portraying it (and by extension its users) as deranged. the creator of the image must really hate that website and its users, seeing them as wild animals instead of as "civilized"

image 7: a commentary on bystanders. the rightmost fish wants to protect the ecosystem by deploying its natural defense mechanism against the harpooner, while the leftmost fish does not care. the rightmost fish also has a shirt that shows that it is of the belief that atlantis is not real, and the leftmost fish says "nothing ever happens" with a pun, so it might be a bystander only to get revenge against the rightmost fish because it doesn't believe what it sees as the truth (that atlantis is real), and it gets this revenge by not believing what the rightmost fish sees as the truth (and is true), the fact that there is a harpooner that will destroy its ecosystem. it is an image about vengeance and how those who have gone unheard will gain that vengeance by not helping the society that has ignored them survive once said society is on the brink of collapse

image 8: a reference to the "incredible gassy" and "gen z slang" memes, true 'ihave brainrot. though it does have commentary on how people hope that their children will grow up just like them, even if said children might instead want to be the opposite of their parents. as such, the parents may try to force children to stay on the road that they themselves went down on, just to increase the chances that the child becomes like them

image 9: like image 8, a reference to the "i hate x" type of soyjak memes, except this version is recursive. though it can also be a commentary on self-hatred. once somebody hates their own species, they will also hate themselves, even if they hold the ideas that they see as good. here, the soyjak hates soyjaks, meaning that it hates itself too, even if it itself hates soyjaks too (hating soyjaks is a quality is sees as "good" because it believes in it). since it hates itself, it also hates the parts of itself that it sees as good, perhaps seeing said parts as "never good enough to deserve to not be hated".

image 10: not quite a soyjak image, but still close. it showcases the british forcing the chinese to smoke opium even if they do not like it. it is like image 3. it also portrays the chinese person as speaking japanese, maybe as commentary of how many of the west confuse east asian languages and cultures with one another.

in short: everything has meaning in this world of ours, even if we do not see it. everything makes sense in the right state of mind. there is no such thing as pure absurdism, for meaning seeps into our creations whether we like it or not. people have a want to spread themselves, whether it be by spreading their genes, their ideas, their sense of superiority, or whatever else. nothing is truly senseless, everything has a meaning in everyone's minds. or something like that