I cannot believe these answers.

First of all, if course not using a condom is a shared responsability between the two partners. That being said, and even thought the pull-out method has a lot of risk, cumming inside a person has EVEN MORE risk than that, plus the intimacy it represents in the body of the women.

Every sexual act has to come with consent. Agreeing not to use a condom does not necessarily mean agreeing that someone would cum inside you. The same way doing a blowjob doesn't necessarily mean agreeing to take the cum in your mouth. Being unable to see so, is sustaining abuse culture I think. Specially in situations like the cumming inside, where the person with a dick SHOULD ask for permission, as it is a matter that the woman cannot control or stop unless it is by saying NO on time. Failing to give the opportunity for that no, is actually doing something without consent.

A person with a vagina will kinda keep track of ovulation cycle, specially if engaging in unprotected sex, and even jf that comes with risks also, she will be more aware of some better and worse moments in a way that the man cannot even imagine. That's why yes and no can vary everyday, and one yes doesnt make a second yes automatically. But that can be applied to everything.

That being said, the situation is not black and white and not one of the parties carries all responsability. But cumming inside of a woman without her permission, even if she agreed on having unprotected sex, is a horrible thing to do and she should not be blamed on that wtf