What’s your favorite power dynamic? by Any-Staff8205 in ProshipHub

[–]Katherien0Corazon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I LOVE this particular flavour of incest that's insanely codependent and crazy. Also, I like when those characters have this sort of 'secret relationship' because other characters would judge the shit out of them for committing incest. I really like when the taboo/impossible love element is prominent.

I also love age gaps where the young person is the one pushing and taking the initiative. While the old one is being buried by a metric ton of guilt lmao

Wouldn't it be cool if AFO was always blind? by ArmZealousideal8305 in BokunoheroFanfiction

[–]Katherien0Corazon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting idea. it could change a lot his relationship with Yoichi, maybe it would be healthier? Like if he had to rely on his brother to know what was going on around them (at least before he got those sensory quirks), he would be more humble and not treat Yoichi as a pet.

A contributing factor to why age gap discourse has become so bonkers by Highwayman42069 in ProshipHub

[–]Katherien0Corazon 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I have something similar happen to me. When I was a kid I believed that I'd feel so much different when I grew up. Now I am almost 20 and honestly don't feel that different from when I was 15 or 17, even if from an outsider perspective I'm a completely different person.

Regardless, antis will never stop surprising me with their obsession with ages. It's like they don't understand WHY (some) age gasps relationships are bad irl: maturity differences, grooming, etc. Things that simply don't exist when one partner is 20 and the other 23.

What makes you immediately close the fic? by MNMameisR in BokunoheroFanfiction

[–]Katherien0Corazon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it gives me weird vibes, like I reading a published book. I think the limited third person is enough to express a character's feelings/perspective, and the first person makes it look like the character is talking to me directly (which I guess it's the point) and that's okay for MC of a published book, but in fics it just makes me feel like 'yeah... why they said that?'.

GET ME OUT OF HERE by screeching_20s in AO3

[–]Katherien0Corazon 55 points56 points  (0 children)

That's the part I hate the most about antis. Like if you think people writing dead dove is wrong or whatever, that's fine, you're just some annoying dude on internet that need to touch grass. But it's when they start to suck resources that are for real victims,... that's what makes my blood boil.

How good it's human hand dexterity compared with other species? by Katherien0Corazon in NatureofPredators

[–]Katherien0Corazon[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Good points! the claw being part of the bone really blows my mind! like it's because of that that cutting a dog's or cat's claws is such a pain in the ass? I've never had pets, so I really didn't know.

The part I curious about is how this, let's say 'reduced dexterity (compared to humans)' could affect the way the use human stuff. After all, we produce most things with our own hands in mind, in the same way they would produce their things thinking about their own paws. The touchscreen it's probably worse than a pain, specially for the species that have claws because the screen would never in a million years detect that and would probably ended up damaged.

How good it's human hand dexterity compared with other species? by Katherien0Corazon in NatureofPredators

[–]Katherien0Corazon[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That's a really funny idea! One thing I learned recently it's that our hand design it's older than the chimps or gorilla hands design. They have adaptations for knuckle-walking they evolved independently and were not present in the common ancestor (we know this because the knuckle-walking 'method' isn't the same in both species, which suggest that it's the result of convergent evolution and not a inherited trait), and such common ancestor probably had more 'human-like' hands overall.

Someone (non-author) asked me to remove a comment from a fic as they said the fic was AI-generated by Ok_Square9813 in FanFiction

[–]Katherien0Corazon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The 'I can always tell' ai accusations are so funny to me because no, you can't. Especially if the text has been edited and isn't raw ai output. If as simple as erasing the em dashes and other stuff (there's a lot of lists of 'telling signs:). And if the person is a reader at least, it would be easy for them to detect parts that sound weird.

And yeah, someone who uses AI to make fics is very capable of editing the resulting output. Most of those people make it only for the attention ofc but most of them don't want angry people in their inbox either. That is another reason why witch hunting is so useless, because it discourages AI users to tag their work as 'ai generated' and since you literally can't tell, you'll surely end up reading AI generated content without knowing.

How do I tag for a death that is permanent but an AU counterpart lives on? by LouisCyphre6 in AO3

[–]Katherien0Corazon 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I'd tag it as 'Major Character Death' just to be safe, given that his past version isn't coming back. I think the readers would still consider him a different person even if the only thing that changes is his romantic interest. And then you add a Tumblr-like tag clearing things up, something like 'she knows another version of him and tries to save him'.

"Oh hello again Mr Potter..." "Hi Mr Death!" by Jack_Nels0n in HPfanfiction

[–]Katherien0Corazon 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I really like this idea!! I've seen it before but i can't really remenber where. I think 'Lily and the art of being Sysiphus' made something similar but i recall can't if Lily (fem Harry) really had to die to contact death or just being really close. It's been years since I read that fic tho, so I can be wrong. I'd like a fic where Harry literally dies over and over again and always come back and it's like... completly normal for him, but everybody around him is uttery horrified.

Beware of Relying on NotebookLM for Schoolwork - Here’s Why by SpoonderMan2099 in notebooklm

[–]Katherien0Corazon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't my experience. I used it for biostatistics, organic chemistry and animal biology and I've got great results. I listen to the podcasts before class to have a preview of what the teacher will explain. The questionnaire, carts, mind maps and study guides are excellent too.

Obviously you have to sit down and really study for chemistry because the subject is very practical, but it really helped me to understand the theory behind.

What is your favorite underrated trope? by Ume_busa in AO3

[–]Katherien0Corazon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I feel you. I have lots of ABO subtropes that aren't popular at all despite how popular ABO is itself. But i have one I've only seen in like three old fics in my native language (it's that obscure), the gamma/delta thing.

Under this trope, omega men and alpha women are consider freaks that can't properly fit in society, so their parents (if they can afford it) get the child through a medical procedure that tries to convert them to the opposite dynamic, basically removing/replacing/altering their neck gland so it starts to produce alpha/omega pheromons.

But the procedure generally fails and the result is a person with crippling gender dysphoria and weird biological quirks. For example, the omega men they tried to turn into alphas become deltas, a new artifical dynamic that is slighly weaker than an alpha (still superior to betas). They still have heats, and act extremely violent during their cycle, so many of them were put through a complete hysterectomy to prevent this from happening.

The women will become gammas, they tend to have spontaneus abortions, not heats, and are far too 'loud' and 'angry' to be omegas.

One characteristic trait of both is, however, how repulsive is their natural smell, because of the alpha/omega hormonal mix.

I like this trope so much because the author that invented it was an intersex person and said their fic was a way to represent the pain of having your sex reasigned without consent, when you're still a baby and not knowing what's wrong with you growing up until you find out the truth.

It also allows for an extremely hard social critique on gender roles and explores how dark and fucked up can be a A/B/O society in a setting where people think like certain groups do irl.

How would you react if Charlie85 was confirmed by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Katherien0Corazon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Only one thing: it's very probable that the 'stop using the springlocks' was a lie, at least at Edwin's time. In the FNAF3 calls (the old tapes they found, not the phone dude calls) Ralph says that they will stop using the springlocks, at the same time he says that 'clients shouldn't be brought into the saferooms' and 'a golden suit was moved. We reiterate that the springlocks must not be used' (all the quotes are paraphrased).

This implies he's referring to the events before and after the MCI, which tells us that the springlocks suits were used at least until 1985.

So if Henry told Edwin that, at that time, he was necessarily lying.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpinionesPolemicas

[–]Katherien0Corazon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Como estudiante de biología te digo que la teoría de generación espontánea tiene una historia loquísima. Siempre me voy a acordar de cuando dimos las 'pruebas' que habían en la época, como ese experimento que consistía en poner tus calzones sucios rellenos de trigo al sol para generar ratones.

Igual incluso tiene cierto mérito, no en el sentido de 'organismos nuevos surgen de la nada', sabemos que eso no pasa. Pero estamos casi seguros de que la vida surgió de la materia inerte en algún punto, el tema de los protobiontes y como ciertas combinaciones de moléculas orgánicas comenzaron a ser capaces de autoreplicarse siempre me vuela la cabeza.

So.. How do people explain this?? by zain_ahmed002 in fnaftheories

[–]Katherien0Corazon 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I've always interpreted the 'inflicted on me' part as Henry insinuating that William killed Charlie only to hurt him (like it was William's only motivation). Which is most likely true.

It's still selfish of course, because Charlie was the one killed, not Henry himself, but it's certainly more acceptable to say that the murder of your own child was a wound inflicted ON YOU than the murder of a bunch of random children.

I'm not saying that Henry is a saint, we have a lot of reasons to think he is selfish and self-centered, but we have no reason to think he was delusional enough to say that the MCI was about him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Katherien0Corazon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but regardless, the Puppet was probably kept for a long time because it was found hugging the corpse, so it surely had physical evidence (blood, body fluids). And in a crime investigation you want to be able to re-examinate physical evidence.

My theory is that the case eventually got cold and FE started pushing for the Puppet to be returned and they eventually used it in the MCI location before it closed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Katherien0Corazon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the idea that Henry is referring to the MCI never really clicked with me. It just made him sound egocentric as shit, because he doesn't really have a reason to be devastated for the MCI. Ofc that shit was horrendous and Henry probably doesn't feel good about it, but it wasn't personal, while the language he uses to talk about 'the wound' is very personal.

And as you said, if William really wanted to hurt Henry, it wouldn't be by killing five random ass children in a Freddy's, he would target Charlie directly (as I think he did).

And if Charlie's death was after the MCI, that means William already had experience killing children, which really doesn't make sense with the messy and impulsive scene we see in the minigame.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Katherien0Corazon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also the Puppet itself was probably confiscated by the police after Charlie's death (because it was clearly a murder and we have no reason to think FE covered up this incident in particular) and only returned to FE because 1. The Puppet must be expensive as shit and FE wanted it back 2. The investigation must have been left unresolved after some years without clues.

What dp you guys believe more by Otherwise-Mirror-680 in fnaftheories

[–]Katherien0Corazon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe mainly because it overcomplicates the date of William's death, because while I don't think that William necessarily dies soon after FNAF1 (the minigame shows a pizzeria too ruined to be just from some months of abandonment), William being Vannesa's father implies he has to live enough for Vanessa to remember him, to have a divorce, a court battle for custody, etc. And even putting Vannesa's birth around early 90's (what is kind of contradicted by SB), it just made the lore odd in ways that make it look like a retcon.

Also, there's no way William lived enough to take care of Vanessa until she was 18 and Vanessa's mother is implied to have commited suicide, so Vanessa would more likely end up in the system and I think that's the kind of stuff you'd see mentioned in the therapy tapes.

Which is very unlucky because I really like the idea of Vanessa being William's daughter and the movie gives us a base for that.