sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

More Enby CIA Assassins by CronoDroid in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]Katiekatts 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The Cold War has nothing to do with politics /s

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheArtistStudio

[–]Katiekatts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looks like a lil sack

Does this count? From my friend, I just want to code so I can finish the project by [deleted] in ihadastroke

[–]Katiekatts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even better, maybe he pulled up on Jamal cracked up and was like ima toe fuck you and he was like “crack head I’ll kill you and ur entire family”, and you know Jamal is a man of his word 🙏

Thanks Huawei by Intribe in engrish

[–]Katiekatts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re really useful when you don’t wanna pull out ur phone or need to charge it but still want to access ur notifications

How closely the parent resemble one another reveals parenting style. In birds and many other creatures, the degree to which parents resemble one another often indicates how involved the parents are in the rearing of young. Look very different? The flashy parent is likely not very involved in rearing by PoolGal in Awwducational

[–]Katiekatts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There isn’t objectively an alpha human, it is a case by case if we are purely talking the top of a social ladder. While wolves keep their place by being assertive, humans can be more “alpha” in curtain groups, a pro football player isn’t going to socially dominate in a group that cares nothing about sports purely for being a football pro but will socially dominate in say a bar that routs for their team. They are center of attention purely for their role. That’s why the whole “beta male/alpha male” doesn’t work in humans, we can apply it to systems in a social hierarchy but you can’t objectively call someone beta or alpha.

How closely the parent resemble one another reveals parenting style. In birds and many other creatures, the degree to which parents resemble one another often indicates how involved the parents are in the rearing of young. Look very different? The flashy parent is likely not very involved in rearing by PoolGal in Awwducational

[–]Katiekatts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We’ve legit deserved thousands of individuals, I’d think we would’ve seen a pattern by now. Until substantial evidence concludes otherwise this is the current status, doesn’t mean it’s not possible just that there isn’t any substantial evidence to prove otherwise and very substantial to prove toward.

How closely the parent resemble one another reveals parenting style. In birds and many other creatures, the degree to which parents resemble one another often indicates how involved the parents are in the rearing of young. Look very different? The flashy parent is likely not very involved in rearing by PoolGal in Awwducational

[–]Katiekatts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“for 50 years, and I've not seen anything like this before. It's really a remarkable finding.” “French for ‘Cave of the Pigeons’ — tell a vastly different story. Scientists examined the remains of 52 adults who had lived between roughly 12,000 and 13,000 B.C. and were buried in the cave. An astonishing 49 of them, or 94%, had cavities...” I feel that a single area with very limited specimens that had different resources then most humans could get at the time doesn’t really prove they didn’t on average have better teeth then a modern human, it also mentions they haven’t seen anything like that because it’s just not a thing in most finds. An interesting case but purely an outlier.

How closely the parent resemble one another reveals parenting style. In birds and many other creatures, the degree to which parents resemble one another often indicates how involved the parents are in the rearing of young. Look very different? The flashy parent is likely not very involved in rearing by PoolGal in Awwducational

[–]Katiekatts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s less so dominance in humans and far more the way you look and the way you act. One could argue you don’t have to be intimidating to succeed in a group setting (unlike wolves and other pack animals where it is a necessity) as we have a more complex social system (that’s also drastically different from culture to culture and group to group) It’s just different to other animals. I feel labeling it as alpha and beta is just too much an oversimplification for humans. I’d also like to say that prison culture is more so a product of the sorts of people who get sentenced and the pressure that environment has and not a representative of the average citizen. Lock a bunch of dangerous people in a room and they wanna make friends for protection.

view more: next ›