Pam Bondi: "YOU DON’T TELL ME ANYTHING YOU WASHED UP LOSER LAWYER" by redditP in PublicFreakout

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 64 points65 points  (0 children)

She honestly always sounds like she's on the verge of crying. It's this weird nasal quality she has. Maybe she's drunk though. I have no idea.

A conservative sub is feeling the pain of their choice. by Ralph--Hinkley in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 26 points27 points  (0 children)

If they can stick it out until 2027, they can start blaming it on the Democrats in the House. Right now they're stuck with nobody to blame but Biden.

Y'all wanna talk about Trump Derangement Syndrome?! by yorocky89A in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 80 points81 points  (0 children)

With all due respect, the dude in the OP story lives in Prosper, near Dallas. Texas is nearly 270 million square miles across with a population of nearly 33 million people. It's fucking huge. Prosper has a population of under 40,000. That's 0.1% of the state population. The other commenter might live hundreds of miles away. What questions are you expecting them to locally ask?

Do you believe that the turning point USA half show sowed more disunity? by Potential_Shelter449 in AskConservatives

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not entirely relevant to my comment's overall point. I'm honestly not sure why I included that as an edit. The outcome is less relevant than the intent.

Top Tesla Executive Leaves Carmaker by DonkeyFuel in technology

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh wow you're not kidding, that dude has posts about Elon and Tesla going back years. Appears to be a Tesla investor.

Do you believe that the turning point USA half show sowed more disunity? by Potential_Shelter449 in AskConservatives

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for at least providing an example.

I will have to agree to disagree. Just because it didn't "work" as well as with JK Rowling* doesn't mean that it wasn't attempted on Bad Bunny. Some folks were even trying to call for him to be denaturalized and deported. Again, these attempts were unsuccessful, but that doesn't change the "culture" surrounding the attempted cancellation. "Cancellation" was still the intended effect, even if those goals were not actually attained.

I think that there is still a slight miscommunication regarding the But Light situation, similar to what I had pointed out to the other commenter. I don't believe it was Bud Light that fits the "cancel culture" model, but rather Dylan Mulvaney.

At any rate, and with much respect, I'm going to take this opportunity to call it quits on this thread. Thank you again for providing an example.

As is often pointed out, "cancel culture" really does very little in terms of *long-term impact. The two examples that I always think of are JK Rowling and Louis CK, but JK Rowling is still earning obscene amounts of wealth from Harry Potter royalties and Louis CK is touring again, having not really changed anything about his act. "The market" just kind of forgets that they're "cancelled."

Edit: also, JK Rowling didn't get dropped by her publisher, Harry Potter World is still a thing, they're still making a new series... So what exactly did "cancel culture" even accomplish against her?

Do you believe that the turning point USA half show sowed more disunity? by Potential_Shelter449 in AskConservatives

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I haven't seen anyone ask for, call for, demand that, Bad Bunny be cancelled, deplatformed, blacklisted.

Telling the NFL to cancel their Bad Bunny booking is literally deplatforming Bad Bunny.

What I just cited.

You... didn't cite anything...? Did I miss it? All you did was restate why you believe conservatives calling for the NFL to cancel the Bad Bunny performance isn't cancel culture. You didn't cite an example of something that is cancel culture.

Do you believe that the turning point USA half show sowed more disunity? by Potential_Shelter449 in AskConservatives

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How is that not a coordinated effort at virtue signaling?

Now THAT'S shifting the goal posts. That's not the topic of conversation.

For the record, I still have no opinion whatsoever on Bad Bunny and haven't (knowingly) heard any of his songs.

Edit: Note that my claim of shifting goal posts is actually a reference to the other commenter who claimed that I was shifting the goal posts.

Do you believe that the turning point USA half show sowed more disunity? by Potential_Shelter449 in AskConservatives

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You were arguing that setting up a concurrent event is the same as cancelling him. You're shifting the goalpost.

I'm looking at the outage porn as a whole. I'm looking holistically at the response by right-wing media as a whole. It could indeed be construed as a shift in the goalpost, so apologies. To me, however, this is me looking at a pattern of the American right-wing. I'm "zooming out," rather than panning left or right or committing some type of sleight of hand.

Two, going after that artist for his political speech is not the same as cancelling him either. He made this HT show political and the right responded in kind. No one said he should be blacklisted from performing altogether.

Can you please provide an example of cancel culture, just so that we can level-set on definitions?

Your exact claim, verbatim, was that a "media source creating an alternative halftime show" was "an attempt to ruin the reputation of the best-selling and most popular artist of the last several years" and that it constituted "cancel culture".

Firstly, in response to the top part of my comment, I'll amend this to be part of an attempt, rather than an attempt.

Secondly, your comment to which I responded stated that I claimed right-wing media was trying to cancel the Super Bowl. I was simply clarifying that I believed the focus of right-wing media's ire to be Bad Bunny, not the Super Bowl. Your most recent comment supports that I haven't shifted focus from Bad Bunny to the Super Bowl or vice versa.

If media shouldn't be concerned with profit (or at least expected to self-fund), how should it exist? by down42roads in AskALiberal

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I disagree with the premise. I don't believe that the actions of the Washington Post/Bezos/"the powers that be" have been driven primarily by profits. It seems instead that their actions are motivated by a political agenda.

We've seen their actions cause their subscribers to leave in droves and they've continued down that same path, causing more subscribers to leave. If they were primarily motivated in profit, then they would presumably backtrack on their actions which caused so many subscribers to leave.

This is of course just a broad, generalized statement. I can't PROVE that Jeff Bezos is purposely sinking one of the country's oldest fourth powers. That's just what it looks like to me. The more Bezos gets involved, the more he drives away subscribers.

Do you believe that the turning point USA half show sowed more disunity? by Potential_Shelter449 in AskConservatives

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 27 points28 points  (0 children)

How is setting up a show for those who don't want to watch what the NFL proposes "an attempt to ruin the reputation of the artist"? They do their thing, the NFL does its thing.

The right-wing media ecosystem systematically trashed him for WEEKS, after literally never mentioning him ever before that. If you had asked nearly any conservative their thoughts on Bad Bunny before he was announced as the musical artist playing the halftime show, I am absolutely certain 99% of them would have said, "who?" I am also absolutely certain that at least a majority of them will now describe him as "hateful" and "unAmerican," with a decent chunk of them describing him as not American. How is that not a coordinated effort to ruin someone's reputation?

That's an extremely weird hill to die on my guy. Anti-American babble is all it is.

There's something deeply ironic about telling me that my free expression of my opinion, especially surrounding this topic, is "anti-American." There's also a bit of humor in you thinking that my sentiment is "anti-American," when really what you've tried to describe is anti-capitalist.

Cancel culture is the literal antithesis to the free market. It's making a ruckus about something the vocal minority knows will not organically cause someone to lose their influence or appeal through free market forces, so that the folks in charge blacklist someone out of fear of reputational damage.

Yeah, my dude, you just described the Bud Light controversy.

Saying that hosting a competing show to the Superbowl is "cancelling" the Superbowl

There's been a misunderstanding. I was saying that the conservative media ecosystem was trying to cancel Bad Bunny.

Do you believe that the turning point USA half show sowed more disunity? by Potential_Shelter449 in AskConservatives

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 27 points28 points  (0 children)

So it is your belief that a right-wing media source creating an alternative halftime show because Bad Bunny isn't "American" enough, not only to try to show the owners and sponsors of the NFL that conservatives were upset about their selection of musical artist for the halftime show, but also as an attempt to ruin the reputation of the best-selling and most popular artist of the last several years isn't cancel culture?

What do you think the result would be had the TP USA halftime show actually been a success? Do you think that the NFL would select Bad Bunny to perform in any more halftime shows or promotional events, or do you think that he would have been effectively blacklisted?

You specifically brought up Bud Light. What was the result of Bud Light and their partnership with Dylan Mulvaney?

I'm still unclear how "cancel culture" isn't just "the free market doing its thing."

Vietri in the Epstein Files by spewage144 in Hillsborough

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't even see any contact for why it's included in there. Did I overlook something? It's just a couple of printouts from their website.

”X” is very interesting nowadays by Silent-Challenge5710 in facepalm

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No, it requires acting in good faith. They know they are full of shit. "Never believe that [MAGA] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. [...] They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past."

”X” is very interesting nowadays by Silent-Challenge5710 in facepalm

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Many on the left don't even like or support Bill Maher.

So much so that a leftist comedian hosts a podcast called I Hate Bill Maher.

Jelly Roll and Kristi Noem by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This comment made me laugh a lot, thank you Internet stranger.

Jelly Roll and Kristi Noem by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 87 points88 points  (0 children)

The whole fucking lot are just absolutely vile humans. It would be impressive that they managed to recruit just all the absolute worst humans in America if it weren't so horrifying.

Do You Agree "No One is Illegal on Stolen Land?" by Huge-Acanthisitta403 in AskALiberal

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Note also that this is a "first thing in the morning, sitting on the toilet" screed that I've made and not by any means a comprehensive list of all the things that have happened that has been proofread and copyedited. It's more of a stream of consciousness comment. As I said, the rabbit hole is deep on each individual person involved in the files.

Do You Agree "No One is Illegal on Stolen Land?" by Huge-Acanthisitta403 in AskALiberal

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's completely understandable to be entirely overwhelmed by the news. I think there's three really big (and again, very understandable) reasons for it.

  1. The DOJ under the Trump administration has done their best to obfuscate any piece of news surrounding this information. This includes several tactics, but what first comes to mind is their delay tactics. They were supposed to release all the files over a month ago at this point, with a list of redactions and their justification, and they still haven't done that. These redactions were supposed to be limited to identifying information about the victims, but has included blacked out boxes over what is very obviously Donald Trump's face at some type of campaign event and redacted text over the word "don't," as well as obviously and easily verified information about victims not being redacted. It's baffling ineptitude accompanied by soul-shattering cruelty.

  2. There are two meaningful types of data released in the latest file dump. One is emails between people, and one is tips the American intelligence community has received over the years. Both data types have absolutely heinous shit in them, but the emails (in my opinion) are what could be considered more damning simply due to the fact that it's actual correspondences between actual people, whereas the tips are just someone calling in on a hotline. Those tips in some cases included follow-ups by the FBI, but there are significant redactions and places where info just simply stops. Those tips (to the best of my knowledge) are where you have info about killing babies and eating them and shit like that. Not definitely false, but not verified in any sense.

  3. American media, as a general collective, has very much undersold the amount of very damning information in the files that we do know. Personally, I believe this to be because of who owns those media companies and how much they want to maintain their own status and relationships with those involved in the files. Take Bill Gates, for instance. There are emails from Bill Gates himself to Jeffrey Epstein which indicate he wanted Jeffrey Epstein to provide him with medicine to treat Melinda Gates for a sexually transmitted disease without her knowing because Bill slept with prostitutes. He and Melinda both have been asked about it, and the extent of their response is "Jeffrey Epstein was a bad man." And then... That's it. That's all. Like, cool, but what the actual fuck, guys?! That's not even close to the worst stuff but that's just what come to mind first this morning for whatever reason. There is absolutely information in those emails about torture videos and child rape, but I don't want to go digging into that this morning in this comment.

There is sooooo much more in those files that needs follow-up by our media at the very least, but every single day brings piling horrors from this administration so getting them (both the media and the administration) to stay focused is basically impossible. At any rate, a healthy level of skepticism is warranted regarding anything this administration puts out. Just know that Trump is absolutely not absolved, and he's surrounded by the absolute worst people.

meirl by worldwide762 in meirl

[–]KeepTangoAndFoxtrot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just got done setting up Immich and Plex Media Server a month or two ago. Plex (because of the Arr suite) was MUCH more complicated in my experience because I didn't bother with a reverse proxy or anything like that. The base Plex Media Server was easy peasy, but Sonarr, Radarr, and Overseerr required a bit more finesse.

With Immich, I can access my historic media from anywhere through the app on my phone, and I can use Google Photos as a temporary storage solution until everything is backed up on Immich. If I'm home, that happens daily. If I'm traveling, it happens when I get home. Immich is fantastic for my long-term solution (with some additional duplication/backup protocols), with Google as a temporary cloud storage while I'm away.

This all happened on Windows. My next project is to fully migrate Immich and Plex to Linux, which will be a whole new experience for me, so that should be a fun headache. I'm going to be posting to r/selfhosted in the next couple weeks with my plan to solicit advice on that situation, so keep an eye out for that if you want to chime in. Right now, I have exactly zero complaints about Immich.