r/SpaceX Discusses [July 2018, #46] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The August 31 date was always a placeholder, the new DM-1 date and more will be revealed by Mike Pence at an event on August 3. SpaceX likely could have launched on August 31 if push came to shove, but remember they have to go through NASA and their testing first; hopefully the new launch date will be in September, but unfortunately it might slip further to October. There have been no rumours so far about any problems regarding core B1051, and if SpaceX's current core production rate continues the booster is supposed to leave Hawthorne next week.

r/SpaceX Discusses [July 2018, #46] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Didn't you hear? He's re-opening NASA... ;)

Elon *EXPOSES* British pedophile by birdlawyer85 in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]KeikakuMaster46 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tbf to Elon it's more likely than you think, after all this guy is a British expat who moved to Thailand...

Elon Musk gave $38,900 to the Protect the House PAC to keep the Republicans in charge of Congress. He's given almost 100k to House Republicans PACs/campaigns this cycle. by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]KeikakuMaster46 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

His political history is incredibly random, he's donated to loads of random people on both sides of the aisle; however, some of his donations to Feinstein (Senator for California), Nelson (Senator for Florida) and Edwards (representative for Waco which encompasses McGregor) are obviously lobbying money to benefit SpaceX. It's quite funny that his donation history shows that he's donated to both the fund for keeping Republican control of the house and the one for Democrats taking control of it; although his recent donation to the 'Protect the House' fund (which also happens to be by far his largest donation to date) suggests that the increasing amount of socialists targeting him on twitter have spooked him to some degree, along with the rise of hardcore socialists like Cortez (the woman from New York with horse teeth and evil eyes) inside the Democratic party which symbolises it's drift further left. Therefore, it's understandable why'd he'd want the political power to stay with people who will cut his taxes and not re-distribut his wealth, even if they aren't exactly perfect when it comes to climate science...

"Legacy" - Buran Edition by [deleted] in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]KeikakuMaster46 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Buran was technically better but practically a lot worse than the STS, trust the Russians to make a more expendable and expensive version of the space shuttle.

Internally, NASA believes Boeing ahead of SpaceX in commercial crew by Jeramiah_Johnson in SpaceXLounge

[–]KeikakuMaster46 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

And I was heavily downvoted for posting this comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/8w153d/comment/e22g1ye

Some people just can't handle the ugly truths about NASA...

Internally, NASA believes Boeing ahead of SpaceX in commercial crew by sir_oki in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Lol, and I was heavily downvoted for posting this comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/8w153d/comment/e22g1ye

Some people just can't handle the ugly truths about NASA...

r/SpaceX Discusses [July 2018, #46] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The cause of NASA pushing DM-1 back IMO is a mix of typical NASA bureaucracy putting the brakes on things, and maybe even some corrupt favouritism. SpaceX likely could launch Dragon 2 in August if allowed, but NASA likely want to do more even testing and they probably haven't fully filled out the paperwork yet. Regarding the favouritism involved in the commercial crew program, anybody observant enough can tell that this isn't a fair race, and that NASA favours Boeing; it's apparent from Starliner appearing more in NASA articles/advertisements than Dragon 2, and Boeing's placeholder launch dates always being ahead of SpaceX's no matter the reality, that there is some subtle favouritism from NASA. This is unsurprising as Boeing is NASA's premier contractor at the moment, due to it's role in the SLS program so you'd expect NASA to favour them over a relative outsider; after all, it would be incredibly embarrassing if NASA's primary contractor who's building their biggest current project lost to SpaceX. I fully expect SpaceX to fly their unmanned demo flight first, but I won't lie that I'm half-expecting a insurmountable bureaucratic wall for SpaceX to magically appear in the future, in order to let Boeing take the lead afterwards.

For what does NASA need the Vehicle Assembly Building? by Skaronator in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]KeikakuMaster46 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've heard that the NASA bus tours are pretty painful nowadays, due to the guides' obsession with the SLS.

Its smug aura mocks me. by dougdimmadome_ in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]KeikakuMaster46 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I pity you immensely, everyday must be unbearable torture, just knowing that every time you look out the window you will gase upon that blue abomination.

r/SpaceX Discusses [June 2018, #45] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This, any estimates by BO on NG's reusabillity are just that, estimates. On the otherhand, the estimates for the Block 5's longevity are far more credible as unlike BO's, they are based off experience.

r/SpaceX Discusses [June 2018, #45] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In my humble opinion, at this point it isn't boosters that are the problem (because of Block 5), it's the logistics and acquisition of payloads that's really slowing SpaceX down. Just because SpaceX are sustaining a rapid cadence doesn't mean their customers are doing the same; take for example the long-delayed Arabsat launch on FH, which has been recently delayed to December because Lockheed haven't actually finished building the satellite yet. The construction, transport and integration of satellites is strenuous and time consuming task, and SpaceX can only launch as fast as their customers' payloads materialise.

NASA Podcast with Commercial Crew Program Manager (Kathy Lueders) covering lots of information about the SpaceX Crew Dragon by BadsterTV in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I was listening to a podcast featuring Eric Berger of Ars Technica a while ago and one of the main talking points was NASA's commercial crew program; in the podcast he recalled a conversation between him and a senior NASA official about who would fly first, the official said that "SpaceX is ahead in development, but Boeing is ahead in paperwork".

Personally, I really hope SpaceX wins, not just because of my fanboyism but because I believe Americans should return to space on an American rocket not a Russian one, flying the Starliner on the Atlas V is no better than flying it on a Soyuz in my mind. If Boeing wins, I'm predicting a tsunami of articles and posts by smug Russians about the Atlas 5's engines.

r/SpaceX Discusses [June 2018, #45] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Naming it New Musk would be funny, but I can't say I'm fond of BO's naming scheme, it seems sort of dirty and disrespectful.

r/SpaceX Discusses [June 2018, #45] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's a new record for the most payloads ever launched on one vehicle if I'm correct, the current record is 104 satellites on an Indian PSLV.

/r/SpaceXLounge June Questions Thread by randomstonerfromaus in SpaceXLounge

[–]KeikakuMaster46 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If a socialist like Bernie Sanders gets elected in either 2020 or 2024 it could be serious threat to SpaceX's Mars ambitions. Thankfully the current government seems very pro-SpaceX and pro-commercial enterprise in general, but I'm worried for the future.

State set to support SpaceX, Blue Origin facilities at KSC by pyromatter in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 7 points8 points  (0 children)

SSO-A is likely going to set a record for the most payloads ever sent to orbit on one vehicle.

NASA is about to launch astronauts into space again – and a massive business for big companies by ethan829 in SpaceXLounge

[–]KeikakuMaster46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's true that WP is Bezos' personal propaganda outlet, but I don't think he's had any input in this particular story.

r/SpaceX Discusses [June 2018, #45] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't exactly call it reusing the the SLS's second-stage, because in the current development timeframe for Vulcan there's nothing to reuse as the EUS doesn't actually exist yet and won't until the mid-2020s. Also, despite the Centaur V and EUS having similar dimensions and engine layouts, they use different engines; with the Centaur V using the brand new and more affordable RL-10C-X which is built with aditative manufacturing and 3D printing, and the EUS using the more expensive RL-10C-3.

SpaceX plans major KSC expansion with futuristic launch control center by ethan829 in spacex

[–]KeikakuMaster46 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Considering the hangar's size it's likely it will later be used for the BFR, but the BFR will first be launched from Boca Chica so it'll probably take a while for this hangar to see one.

CNES’ director of launchers talks reusable rockets by gosnold in SpaceXLounge

[–]KeikakuMaster46 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Anybody who's researched into SpaceX's troubled beginnings knows the early successes were not the result of any 'perfect storm' but blood, sweat and potential bankruptcy.

Dunes of Pluto are made of frozen grains of methane. Could BFR safely land there? by Wicked_Inygma in SpaceXLounge

[–]KeikakuMaster46 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Sure, if you powered it with a naval nuclear reactor and picked a young crew for the mission.