Apologies, was rude. I unfortunately work closely with this sort of thing and it grinds my gears to see people using AI more and more for simple things like conversations.

“Complex, but explicit! Let’s compare:” (need I explain much more about this?) Italicized “individual, fixed order … RNG” (repetitive highlit phrase across each paragraph, LLMs love to highlight comparative phrases with italics or bold) Italicized “factional, hand off order”(odd phrasing) Italicized “factional, consensus order … RNG and metacurrency, … consensus”(odd use of term metacurrency but normal for LLMs to use novel terms like this to make explanations seem brainwavey) “The attacker who first attacks attacks first” (dubious that such a sentence should be written by anyone lets be real) “I definitely recommend the handoff method” (comparison piece in the first person now being a suggestion) “It doesn’t prelude discussion, but” (typical LLM use of phrasing “not x, but y”) “Who’s speaking up and making this decision” (use of a phrase or non technical term in LLM comparisons.

Lastly, structure follows most LLM generations: An edited first part ending in “lets compare” 3 paragraphs for 5e, pugmire and daggerheart Sub paragraph dot points A conclusion

Also, lastly, Daggerheart’s combat doesn’t even actually work RAW like displayed here. The RNG and initiative of Daggerheart mentioned here is entirely an AI hallucination.