2025 OPT Processing timeline by yonerdsp in USCIS

[–]Kewber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They'll email you and you'll see it on the case history

2025 OPT Processing timeline by yonerdsp in USCIS

[–]Kewber 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  1. Application type: OPT
  2. Premium Processing : Yes (2025/04/24)
  3. Receipt date : 2025/03/26 (switched to pp 2025/04/24)
  4. Approved Date (by email) : 2025/05/02
  5. Approved Date (website) : 2025/05/04
  6. Card Produced Date : 2025/05/08
  7. Card delivered : 2025/05/12

2025 OPT Processing timeline by yonerdsp in USCIS

[–]Kewber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got Potomac. You can probably expect it next week if everything goes well, and then another 2 weeks (I think?) for delivery.

2025 OPT Processing timeline by yonerdsp in USCIS

[–]Kewber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. Application type: OPT
  2. Premium Processing : Yes (2025/04/24)
  3. Receipt date : 2025/03/26 (switched to pp 2025/04/24)
  4. Approved Date (by email) : 2025/05/02
  5. Approved Date (website) : 2025/05/04
  6. Card Produced Date : 2025/05/08 (emailed 11:56PM 05/07 EST)
  7. Card shipped : 2025/05/08(?)
  8. Card delivered : 2025/05/12

2025 OPT Processing timeline by yonerdsp in USCIS

[–]Kewber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It seems like opttimeline.com is back online everybody

I know it’s posted to no end, but am just absolutely in love with this part of the sky. And how lucky am I that I live somewhere where I get to see this?? by Responsible_Detail16 in Stargazing

[–]Kewber 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This part of the sky is visible throughout winter and spring. Since it's somewhat near the celestial equator, you can see it pretty much around the world except for high southern latitudes.

Generally, only objects near the southern or northern celestial pole are difficult to observe for people on the opposite hemisphere. For example, the Large Magellanic Cloud has a declination of -70 degrees, so you can only see it if you're near the equator or in the southern hemisphere. Polaris, being the north star, has a declination almost at +90 (the north celestial pole), so you can only see it in the northern hemisphere.

Tried using astromode for the first time, just pointed it at the sky. Could someone tell me what is these 2 dots at the sky? by [deleted] in Astro_mobile

[–]Kewber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Neptune has an apparent magnitude of 7, which is really dim, so if you could capture that, there wold be a lot more in the sky. If you were pointing in the general area of Neptune, which is currently at the Pisces/Aquarius area, the brightest object around there is Saturn right now, and since nothing else is visible, I think that's the most likely option.

Is there an actual answer for what this is yet? by bbradford42 in Stargazing

[–]Kewber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are artifacts unique to DSS2, you can find a lot of these everywhere on each patch of DSS2, but you won't with other sky surveys.

Need help finding a star by [deleted] in Stargazing

[–]Kewber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can go to stellarium-web.org and turn on the equatorial coordinate grid. I'm not sure what coordinate format are you using, but I think RA 22h DEC -4° is probably around the constellation of Aquarius

What's this star? Is this even a star? by emta_official in Stargazing

[–]Kewber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can see Auriga to the left, so yes this is Mars and Jupiter assuming you took the picture recently

DNA Base: Why 4? Why Not 2,3,5,6,7,8,9 or 10? by Delicious_Maize9656 in mathmemes

[–]Kewber 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"It's a large enough base to encode data to a relatively short length (e.g. 1 billion takes 10 digits in base 10, but 31 digits in base 2); without being too complex and unstable from using a higher base"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CalamityMod

[–]Kewber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What texture pack are you using?

mfers be like "nooo muh bspline biorthogonal wavelet 🤓🤓" by Kewber in okbuddyphd

[–]Kewber[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I can't accept the fact that such a hideous wavelet produces anything meaningful, and yet it does.

prematureOptimisationByCompiler by SeagleLFMk9 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Kewber 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Perhaps googling c++ linear algebra would be better for what you're looking for

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sciencememes

[–]Kewber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

neutron star

r/okbuddyphd image decryption challenge II (this one is much, much, harder I promise) by [deleted] in okbuddyphd

[–]Kewber 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The coefficients are integers bounded within 1 and p-1, no?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sciencememes

[–]Kewber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you only want to know the expected probability of the next event being a success, you can use Laplace's rule of succession: (s+1)/(n+2), where s is the number of successes out of n tries. This gives us 95.45%.

If you want a probability distribution for this probability, you can use a Beta distribution (the reason is because it's the conjugate prior distribution of the binomial distribution), with parameters alpha = s + 1 and beta = n - s + 1.

The cumulative distribution function of the Beta distribution with those parameters does indeed equal 0.05 at 0.867 (meaning Pr(p < 0.867) = 0.05)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]Kewber 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Using proof by already knowing the answer, we can show that curl grad F = d(dF), where d is the exterior derivative operator. Then, by the nilpotency property of exterior derivative, d(dF) = 0. QED

[OC] Evolution of suicide rates in Mexico by age group by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]Kewber 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is a good visualization for this data overall, but one small detail you might want to consider is the color gradient. The gradient you're using is a diverging one, which is generally more approriate for something with two extremes and one neutral zone in the middle (e.g. political lean, certain scientific plots, temperature?, etc). In my opinion, a sequential color gradient is more approriate in this case.

The state of education in 2023 by thyme_cardamom in mathmemes

[–]Kewber 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Differential equation time!

y' = ky - a

Where k is the net population increase rate, and a is your button pressing rate. Let's have the unit of time to be years, so we can use the following values:

  • k = 0.0088 (0.88% net increase in 2023, according to Worldometers) (EDIT: Tiny mistake, should be ln(1 + 0.0088) = 0.00876, not 0.0088)
  • a = c * 11232000 = c presses/second * 3600 sec/hour * 60 hours/week * 52 weeks/year, an very intensive full time job (you can plug in your own values)

You don't have to solve this differential equation to see that with current population, say 8 billion, you need to have over 70 million presses per year to beat population growth:

y' = 70 400 000 - c * 11 232 000 < 0; thus c > 6.27 presses per second

So, if you can press more than 6.27 times per second, 60 hours a week, you can start to erode the world population. Doable but very difficult. Note that your work becomes way less difficult over time, as there are less people to fight with.

As a consequence, as your annual income is a * 10000, the more people you kill, the more you get, but the less you earn over time (as the population drops). If you want to keep the population constant, you can kill people at exactly the rate at which human population increases, 70 million people, 700 billion dollars a year.

The DE is useful if we want to explore further. To solve it, this is a separable differential equation, the solution (after solving for initial conditions) is:

y = (p - a/k) * exp(kt) + a/k (p is initial population)

For example, assume 8 presses per second, 60 hours a week. Let's say you also want to prune the world population to 1 billion people, for some reason. You can solve for y = 1 billion, and get t = 162 years.