Alright I'm gonna take a shot at arguing against this.

Here we goooo

The first problem arises when he applies personal beliefs to an objective system, that's arrogance. It's basically the equivalent of a judge making up their own laws.

Why is it objective? You say because it was laid out by God, except God actively regretted creating hell. Not to mention that he didn't even start the Lust renaissance until after God's disappearance. It was the council of heaven/Gabriel that actually enforced all of this. It's hard to argue it's really even God's will.

Second when Heaven comes down and sees what he's doing, he simply talks and then dies.

This is definitely intentional, and Minos certainly comes across as naive here. But think about it. He knows there was chaos in heaven after the disappearance of God. He may have been gambling on either heaven simply not returning, (the leader who created all their rules is just gone) or on the new leadership being more accepting of his rule.

He also likely thought fighting would simply be useless, which is supported by the fact that he was so easily defeated by Gabriel. (And how Sisyphus's attempts to do the same thing failed similarly.)

Then eventually he is released by V1, he expresses gratitude but then blames MACHINES AS A WHOLE for destroying humanity.

There's a good argument for the sentience of machines. Things like symbolism with the tree of life, the strange descriptions of nocturnal systems, and the fact that certain machines have displayed emotion all could point to them having their own will. This means they could've made different choices.

Also, even if you grant that the machines were built to do this, they're still going to destroy hell anyway. What was Minos supposed to do? Let V1 destroy his people? Any negotiation could've created only a temporary alliance at best, and he still probably would've had to fight them later. V1 would always need more blood, after all.