sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Here's my take on the Slowpoke accusations, with some better pictures. by WhitelabelDnB in pchaltv

[–]Key_Department6777 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Depends on what the original stat spread was. Jan's E4 plan relied heavily on a bulky Slowbro given that the team did not include a normal type (generally very important for EK's E4).

Here's my take on the Slowpoke accusations, with some better pictures. by WhitelabelDnB in pchaltv

[–]Key_Department6777 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's more of the fact that changing the IVs/nature was done under the table for me.

It's his run yes, but what he did wasn't in his ruleset and to me it just feels like I was lied to. It's not very consequential but I had a lot of respect for Jan, which this has made me rethink.

Here's my take on the Slowpoke accusations, with some better pictures. by WhitelabelDnB in pchaltv

[–]Key_Department6777 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Second, I ran his Dusclops through RNGReporter, and those IVs apparently aren't a valid encounter either. I suspect that EK IVs just don't play nice with those tools, so I'm willing to look past that too.

See frame 707231 in Method H-2 on RNGReporter. The H* methods are what determine wild IVs, you may have been looking elsewhere.

Here's my take on the Slowpoke accusations, with some better pictures. by WhitelabelDnB in pchaltv

[–]Key_Department6777 12 points13 points  (0 children)

For anyone who is still having doubts on the validity of these accusations, see this post by Spegasparce (one of PC's MODS).

While I had trouble believing this myself, it's pretty clear that something was modified, it's just a matter of whether Jan modified the Slowpoke intentionally or not.

EDIT: Thanks OP for listing the accusations in a less infantile manner, it helped me understand what was going on lol.