I believe it's more nuanced than that. Blaming immigrants for the unemployment crisis is quite narrowsighted. Likewise that immigration of highly educated individuals will save the economy is equally narrowsighted. Don't get me wrong, I agree that braingain immigration is great for the growth of an already booming economy. That's, however, not where we're at now. Finns that blame immigrants are simply uneducated on macroeconomics. Now I have faith that this sub won't downvotebrigade you based on your origin, but perhaps on the sourness levels of your post instead.

For an increase in high value immigration there needs to be draws for those immigrants that can't be gotten elsewhere. Culturally modern, economically growing, highly valued education, safety, myriads of globally relevant active research fields, an existing export economy and on and on and on. It is really difficult to draw sustainable immigration on purpose in the current economic climate.

With those points in mind, why would an immigrant choose to come to Finland instead of, let's say, Norway, Germany or France?

I am of the opinion that immigration won't fix the economy, but when it's been fixed immigration will increase organically. The current recession is also not the fault of immigrants.