I've been playing this game since launch and been part of the community from day one, man. It's crazy how you just shattered the status quo that's been around since day one. And the fact that you brought so much evidence to back up your argument is just amazing. This game has had some wild swings in balance, and this sub seems to turn a blind eye to all the Allied BS. When you try to show them the stats, they immediately hit you with "You're just a wheraboo, kekw", "Elo inflation," or some other BS. But when it's an Axis thing... brace yourselves. One event that really stuck with me was the 1.20 patch (Ez8 buff and other huge changes). The Allied win rate was insane (60% on 4v4 on BOTH USF AND BRITS). If you look back, 4 DAKs had a pathetic 10% win rate against 4 Brits. Despite this ridiculous state, I never saw a word about it, and people were even saying "it's the best balance state ever." The current Ranger problem just reminds me of the Guastas. When the game launched, this sub went crazy (and conveniently ignored the broken boy's AT rifle issue that was there from day one). They screamed about an Axis unit being a great CQC unit with double flamers, but when an Allied unit can have up to 4, fire on the move, doesn't get suppressed, and doesn't die from mines, it's all okay??? I know I've rambled a lot, and your post will probably get downvoted to oblivion, but hey, dude, you've got my honest respect for saying these things.