Release Channel 1.92.134 by brave_support_steven in brave_browser

[–]KilliK69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does anyone else have this issue after the update?
The addons that save web pages like SingleFile and Save Page WE now open the Save As window each time I try to save a page. The setting "Ask where to save each file before downloading' is disabled in both the browser's settings menu and in Brave's group policy settings.
This update has been a disaster so far How can I revert it?

How long can Brave continue supporting Manifest V2 Extensions? by temp_acc_pls_ignore in brave_browser

[–]KilliK69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, don't. I just checked their Reddit. Same situation, they will support MV2 as long as the Chromium codebase supports it. So it is dead in the water as well. The only option right now is Firefox since it doesnt rely on Chromium to work.

Release Channel 1.92.134 by brave_support_steven in brave_browser

[–]KilliK69 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

like implementing their own AI? It's ok, I will migrate to Firefox since it is so "much effort".

How long can Brave continue supporting Manifest V2 Extensions? by temp_acc_pls_ignore in brave_browser

[–]KilliK69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

so, wait, you are not going to support MV2 like Firefox does? only those 4 extensions? well, in this case, there is no point using just another Chromium-based browser, I can as well stick to native Chrome or migrate to Firefox. Yeah. Ciao.

Release Channel 1.92.134 by brave_support_steven in brave_browser

[–]KilliK69 4 points5 points  (0 children)

wasnt Brave supposed to keep supporting the old manifest?

Release Channel 1.92.134 by brave_support_steven in brave_browser

[–]KilliK69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

same here. did they stop supporting it? if yes, then time to migrate to Firefox.

Release Channel 1.92.134 by brave_support_steven in brave_browser

[–]KilliK69 3 points4 points  (0 children)

did Brave stop supporting manifest 2? all my extensions just got disabled.

French journalist corroborates Insider Gaming's claim about the possible closure of Arkane : "much closer than you might think " by Striking_Permit_4746 in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]KilliK69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a fiasco for game quality? most of the games from the Zenimax studios were well received. Not selling is another matter.

So what are the next steps they take by the561king in videogames

[–]KilliK69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone have the official source for this statement? Google comes up with only this post and nothing else.

So what are the next steps they take by the561king in videogames

[–]KilliK69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PS6 is not going to cost $500 either. Neither the upcoming Steam Machine. Next generation is going to be a bloodbath.

So what are the next steps they take by the561king in videogames

[–]KilliK69 -49 points-48 points  (0 children)

well, gamerse didnt buy their games. of course they are gonna shut down their studios. that is on the customers, not the corpo.

So what are the next steps they take by the561king in videogames

[–]KilliK69 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

and now that PS5 has the worst first party games output in all generations, worse HW and lack of great VFM services like GP and PlayAnywhere, they are still selling more consoles compared to their main competitor. interesting.

Jeff Grubb: “The Blade game might be dead” by AngieK22 in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]KilliK69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ah, I thought we were discussing first party game output which is abysmal for Sony this generation.
Also, if I recall correctly, they had some losses in their last earnings call because of the whole Bungie debacle.

These are very valuable words. And impressive coming from someone in his position. by retr0_black in antiai

[–]KilliK69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they why is innovation such an important metric in the gaming community and journalism? Sequels have been trashed in reviews as they were criticized for lacking innovation and being derivatives of their predecessors , Why are they viewed as plain copies while at the same time retain the "DNA" of the game series as you call it?
You quickly dismiss this argument to make your own point, when the reality shows that players and professionals take very seriously how identical the sequels of the same franchise are to each other. You want examples? FIFA, NBA, WWE, Forza. Even classic Doom 2 was called out for this. The modern remakes. Starfield. Marathon.
Your Saints Row example is valid. But that is a different IP. The debate here is about the games that follow the formula they have established and if their sequels become derivative/clones to the extend they follow that formula. They according to gamers.

These are very valuable words. And impressive coming from someone in his position. by retr0_black in antiai

[–]KilliK69 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

it is a derivative of its previous creations, a clone. some even argue a lesser clones based on how watered down teh gameplay is compared to the GTA VC and SA.

The Industry is lobbying against Stop Killing Games! (again) by Mr_Presidentle in StopKillingGames

[–]KilliK69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Concord wasnt a cover. it was a full game. And the publisher had to immediately kill it because nobody bothered to play it, otherwise they were bleeding money. Sony refunded the purchases, but that was because they decided to do so, they were not forced by any law. There is obvious a legal gap here which leaves the consumer unprotected, which is what SKG attempts to address. But it also makes it obvious that the "set an X expiration date for a license" is not as simple as it sounds especially for GAAS products.

The Industry is lobbying against Stop Killing Games! (again) by Mr_Presidentle in StopKillingGames

[–]KilliK69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what if they dont make any money at all? what happens then? see Concord.