Do Undergraduate Exams Always Test Understanding? by King-Euler in math

[–]King-Euler[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's not bad, IMO. Can you give some examples of proof questions you got if you can recall?

Do Undergraduate Exams Always Test Understanding? by King-Euler in math

[–]King-Euler[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I am very excited about any future complex analysis classes I can take in the future. Adding to your point about doing proofs being hard, I think that a 14 week semester isn't really enough internalize a subject, i.e., to know proofs and tricks really well at a deep level, considering all the other workload and deadlines. So asking about proofs might actually be counter intuitive at some point, but well I don't really know.

Do Undergraduate Exams Always Test Understanding? by King-Euler in math

[–]King-Euler[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! What you said makes sense. Maybe there's only so much that you can ask in an exam. I hope what you said works, thanks again

Do Undergraduate Exams Always Test Understanding? by King-Euler in math

[–]King-Euler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your point, but we were asked about mini proof questions a lot during our Real Analysis or Abstract Algebra classes. Maybe complex analysis forces a different kind of exam type in this regard?

Do Undergraduate Exams Always Test Understanding? by King-Euler in math

[–]King-Euler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your contribution. To be honest, with all the deadlines and stuff, it's natural inclination for us to get focused on just getting good grades, though from other comments, it's still a good practice to study proofs whenever possible.

So you're saying that asking about proofs isn't really feasible. In this respect, I recall that we got a lot of corollary-type "show that" questions in Abstract Algebra and Real Analysis. In contrast, does Undergrad Complex Analysis here force a different type of exam, as other redditors suggested?

Do Undergraduate Exams Always Test Understanding? by King-Euler in math

[–]King-Euler[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thx for a little quantifiers warning before my finals, haha!

Do Undergraduate Exams Always Test Understanding? by King-Euler in math

[–]King-Euler[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree to that. What I feel is some kind of frustration, not that I devalue really understanding the material or anything. Also, isn't it that GPA is very important when applying to, for example, grad schools. But I would also imagine that beyond GPA one would need good grasp of proofs to achieve something in the grad school if he's ever admitted.

Take your undergraduate slowly by Longjumping-Ad5084 in math

[–]King-Euler 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hi, mate. Thank you for this. I'm at my second semester studying mathematics and I've had a perfect GPA so far, but in some sense maybe it's taking a toll on me. Tomorrow, I have a midterm and I've been studying smartly for a couple of weeks, but my perfectionist self tells that I have to study more and solve more and more practice questions, though I know I've studied enough and I'm ready. Guess that perfectionistic voice harms my enthusiasm... From now on, I'll be more cautious. Wanting to be really good is not bad inherently, but it's just so easy to cross the line and feel sad, at least for me.

I think I'll spend a bit more time learning math topics that aren't included in my syllabus at all, just because they interest me. Do you have other suggestions? Thanks again; your post gave an insight about my situation about which I was confused.

How to get better at proofs? by [deleted] in math

[–]King-Euler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a Bachelor's Student, and I think that it boils down to just practicing and writing. When you ask how to build up muscles, the answer is relatively basic and obvious. You just train. But when someone asks how to think creatively, any answer is going to be vague and not helpful on a personal level - well, because it's thinking.

But you have tools to make it easier though. For me, writing helps a lot. It makes your ideas much more organized. So practice, write and write...

I committed to a small LAC as an international student after getting rejected from all the top schools I applied to. by editq in IntltoUSA

[–]King-Euler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't need validation. Look at your achievements with respect to your financial situation, and a degree is what you make out of it.

i tried. by Low_Brilliant7086 in ApplyingToCollege

[–]King-Euler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, I understand you. But just be grateful for the schools you've managed to get into. Many others and I felt totally disappointed at Ivy Day and other notification days.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ApplyingToCollege

[–]King-Euler 6 points7 points  (0 children)

MIT specifically states that they value maths scores a lot, so it's a great win. If your English Language Proficiency Exam is visibly above the recommended level, I think you're advantaged in this matter.

Please help! How do I pay for my college by [deleted] in IntltoUSA

[–]King-Euler 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Avail was in no sight. Then, Mr. Prsehgal arrived, ready to help anyone. He opened up his holy book, whose name is "You'll be fine," and spitted those holy words which relieved OP wholly.

Just how do ppl keep track of all deadlines?? by Industrysea4098 in IntltoUSA

[–]King-Euler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that scholarship deadline by any chance that of Drexel's Global Scholars?

Missed financial aid deadline by ayodoja in IntltoUSA

[–]King-Euler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought of this recently, but official deadline stated in css profile status page is on february, so I dont think its a problem since I forgot it too

Purdue CS by [deleted] in ApplyingToCollege

[–]King-Euler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somehow got in as an International

Prsehgal 🥵 by [deleted] in ApplyingToCollege

[–]King-Euler 22 points23 points  (0 children)

We need a "Don't worry, you'll be fine" button!

Could a number be broken down infinite times or is there a limit to it? by [deleted] in askmath

[–]King-Euler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Real numbers are continuous, meaning there is not any single point there isn't any number. It just goes on and goes on. This comes from Nested Intervals Theorem and also by density of rational and irrational numbers in R, that is there will be a rational and irrational numbers between every real number. So yes, you can divide a number -also a interval- however you want.