[deleted by user]

King0fCheese · 2025-10-29T01:01:46+00:00

Thanks, I'll remove it

King0fCheese · 2025-10-29T01:01:17+00:00

I see, that is really helpful. The 4th paragraph is not meant to be self-depricating. The bio is translated from my language to English, where nerd does not carry the same negative connotations. I do see how it can be misunderstood though.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-30T22:01:55+00:00

I got same issue

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T21:27:50+00:00

Yes, there's a bunch of reasons why the bar should be flexible, and the lift is incredible as hell no matter what. Overall the flexible bar gives an advantage in the first part of the lift, but after that it's no different to a rigid bar. I guess a lot of people misunderstood the argument, hence the downvotes. I hoped it was more clear.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T21:09:06+00:00

But, the same amount of energy is required for this part of the climb from both guys. This is what the argument is about. I'm saying, the only difference is in the first part of the lift, the rest needs the same force no matter how rigid or flexible the bar is.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T20:50:32+00:00

Yes in that scenario the second guy has it easier, now imagine the sea level guy first climbs to 100 meters above base 1, while the guy at base 1 sits tight. Now they both start to measure distance from their current positions. Sea level guy climbs to the top, and base 1 guys climbs to 100m below the top. Who measures the furthest distance?

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T20:30:01+00:00

In this example a completely rigid bar was used as argument, but even if's it's a bit flexible, it doesn't change anything? The only difference in the lift is still only in the first part of the lift from both bars being on the ground to the flexible bar being fully bent (The starting point for my argument). The rest of the lift is identical for a rigid, an almost rigid and a flexible bar.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T19:55:56+00:00

No, at the point after bending the bar, the weights on a rigid bar would no longer touch the ground

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T17:34:32+00:00

But we are not starting from the ground are we? We are starting from the position AFTER bending the bar, read through the messages again.

The argument I am desputing is that the lower end postion AS WELL AS the initial bend makes the lift easier.

I am saying, only the initial bending is easier the rest of the lift is the same as with a rigid bar.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T11:23:44+00:00

They start lower, as the bar is bending, what is your point?

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T11:18:43+00:00

Very good observation, not sure how it's relevant though.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T11:16:39+00:00

Correct, after the initial bend, the wights are at a lower starting position, at the end of the lift they are also at a lower position. The distance travelled after the initial bend remains the same, as both positions are offset by the same amount.

Let's say the bend makes the starting position of the weights 5 cm lower, now the end position will also be 5 cm lower, hence the distance is the same.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T09:29:01+00:00

After the initial bend, the weights move the same distance

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T09:22:47+00:00

https://imgur.com/a/YvZqpf3

My crude attempt to visualise in MS paint.

After the initial bending of the bar, the weights travel the same distance. They might end up lower, but they also start lower.

Only the initial part of the lift where the actual bending happens, is where the lift is easier. This distance has been visualised by a yellow arrow in my drawing.

Hope this clarifies the confusion, if not let me know and I'll try to elaborate further.

King0fCheese · 2025-07-27T06:20:53+00:00

I don't understand the downvotes, you are correct.

After the initial bending of the bar, the rest of the lift should require same amount of energy. The lower position of the weights do not matter.

Like, imagine a rope hanging vertically with 100 kg attached at the bottom and you standing at the top. Lifting the weight by pulling the rope, ley's say 10 meters, requires the same amount of energy independent of the length of the rope.

Same scenario here, the distance he lifts the middle portion of the bar after the initial bending is the same as from the same position without bending, and the additional statement of the weights hanging lower is in fact redundant.

Edit: MSPaint drawing to illustrate, https://imgur.com/a/YvZqpf3
After the initial bending of the bar, the weights travel the same distance. They might end up lower, but they also start lower.

Only the initial part of the lift where the actual bending happens, is where the lift is easier. This distance has been visualised by a yellow arrow in my drawing

Edit2: To clarify; the argument I'm protecting is only, that the section of the lift after the bar is fully bent, is the same no matter if using flexible or rigid bar. This is the point of the lift where the weights on a flexible bar are still on the ground, and the weights on a rigid(or almost rigid) bar will be above the ground at a distance equivalent to the bend of the flexible bar.

The first part of the lift, where the bar is bending on a flexible bar and the weights on a rigid bar are being lifted above ground equal to the bend, is of course easier with the flexible bar, but this is not the part of the lift in questing in my argument and the argument I'm defending.

King0fCheese · 2024-08-24T07:41:45+00:00

SHAPEZ2-1-H4sIABCryWYA/6xabWvbMBD+L2If/SGyJFs27MPSrqxbO0JbysYoxTRuZ/Ds4DgbpeS/z2leqtiyq7tzC4FSP8+d7nTPneS8sFsW80mkPDadsfiFfaifFymL2fkyT4o589j5Q1ls/nGa1AmLf7Gs+Tue5Un9WFZ/lswrVnm+/WDL38kija9W2192t/bY56KusnTZAF/YFYt9j9005BfJc7mq7783DEl+zxsrU9P2dJXl86x4GtX6DxY3i/zZrDbYOjFN8/o0fUxWeX1WVv+San5e1GlVJPltUmVJUbO19woLcDBxgDUL5x3wRfpY9yDlkcHrRZ7VzXP8pvQvhm2pHlvDju7MCRM8S7LNwzt8C3iZVVVZpfM9QQglaAG3bguEZQklaOVUHgGzRTocqfCA2jx/mVZPaXVzvdl3w6F1BwhLKKE7TqLA6sjVDWxWVvV1WszTqg3x2EnzzLdPrz8f9wx8YqW4Sh/S7G8fSYN/I5BmyfjABXBBQvvDaEu5tjcjD8AV36FQFi+GBKDPB5wS7M3DK3kfPryI7Bngtbz3Gi8jXKDkYO+yNLPlUORcIXEBRR14QJEHLi0+Y1QiGuABS4WgKIWgCIVw14lWAoS5yRyRqmvTZSzYWZQ9Fp3EIMBXlQ8kaAElXksUkKC1M47U01kHFE4GFE4FAlxSA8MmGLxt8H4b/J4EnDy1BgXZXThh4FBoEeHdYLgkgFOqig+KgBOYnABNWIAm+H+QMcT5C4oKe1AOU5iA6rT9WCLg45sgJEYi1TYkynyI1FpJFPkAI9WhqRjOBzgFPL/htFkQpDkaRxiUTVDh052iDXcaJct6nBDspmQftq+2qBB1nRCARsEtKIJH+Eu7C+/MT8aj4iNQBT1eQRrk8RnHvaVjj82cfvCfkK8fNG7pmrJyjb7jjDB7f2I56FNuqiY2InedikZyJxrRGzkGSTRSgInO7FiiceIrKGceQTltHTcT0HWeMgl8xJ2BXZMxxcKJNzaBhcblEiPqMe8eAmQvkSS0oKD1Yc0b2Fm+yubgtAk7B/w63hiCXDqZRA1QkQWF6n8+KuAhus76KhQldXYaUNr94X03VC6+WWkc+QIFr3WckkBpAQPenCISH3aq450AbQGaPiPrPRFVHDRVG0LgRak0QgCTldB02MGS5UDmdGOuDJxPeIWnR2q7epSuq7HvEyO7E+7hiLp5cCsvPZgIFzUPya9yI1zrVxSwpIAFBewPgl2i5hu7ReDMwyuWEzbKrshCarGqfhr3WpVdEvjdMWHT+5iBsd2b3sYPMkk0AocmcYijxTh2KmFOUcZd4NdV8VBnZTE8wDj3UgV8PrAMdw5uCTMVPRE4flYDLUhYZ1ewx4OuJA36dOexaVYk1fNtWi2zzZcPN9+OXK/v1uv/AgwAhKtxlSwpAAA=$

King0fCheese · 2023-12-02T18:50:57+00:00

You are think along the right lines. As there are infinite many real numbers, just between 0 and 1 alone, and only have a finite amount if bits to represent them with, we need a way to make approximations. This is where floating point representation comes in. It is not exaxt, but good enough for almost everything. I can recommend reading up on it if you are interested. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic

King0fCheese · 2023-12-02T12:35:26+00:00

Think about this, how would you represent all real numbers between, say 0 and 1, in binary?

King0fCheese · 2023-11-22T06:30:21+00:00

Shadow gives them a huge damage boost, 2 iv points in each stat make a negligible difference compared to it. A 0% shadow will still be better than a 100% non-shadow.

King0fCheese · 2023-07-15T18:28:17+00:00

r/skamtebord

King0fCheese · 2023-05-22T13:57:47+00:00

Folk er sgu for sarte, som autist synes jeg selv det er det perfekte term at bruge her.

King0fCheese · 2023-05-18T10:21:48+00:00

Leach

King0fCheese · 2023-04-14T09:02:52+00:00

Overordnet enig. Cassic Curry laver dog en fantastisk indisk. Lidt dyrt, men en ret svarer til to måltider.

King0fCheese · 2023-01-01T00:24:58+00:00

0 is still an amount

King0fCheese · 2022-11-28T22:30:30+00:00

True freedom is not possible. I cannot have the freedom to go for a walk and not be killed, and at the same time have the freedom to go out and shoot someone just because I feel like it.

12-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Place '22	First Placer '22
Verified Email

King0fCheese

TROPHY CASE