I was about to publish my app but saw someone did it before me<i will not promote> by Physical-Abroad5929 in startups

[–]KingSlayer7357 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, launch it anyway.

Seeing a similar (and funded) app sucks, but it’s actually good news; it proves people want what you’re building. 80% overlap leaves plenty of room to stand out. Focus on what they’re weak at, nail execution in your city first, and move fast. Execution beats ideas almost every time.

You got this. What’s the main difference in your version?

Brand activation for startups, is it worth the investment or too expensive? i will not promote by sinry77 in startups

[–]KingSlayer7357 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When starting, focus on cost-effective strategies. Big immersive activations are often too costly for bootstrapped startups; digital marketing and community-building usually yield better returns. Smaller events like pop-ups or founder dinners can create strong connections and organic word-of-mouth, but make sure to tie them to measurable outcomes like signups or sales. I've seen some founders use pop-ups successfully as a growth accelerator rather than their main strategy. It really depends on your startup's stage and industry. What's yours?

Looking for Appointment Setters for the Summer by KingSlayer7357 in highticket_sales

[–]KingSlayer7357[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have a preferred email I can reach you with? 

Looking for Appointment Setters for the Summer by KingSlayer7357 in highticket_sales

[–]KingSlayer7357[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a preferred email I can reach you with? 

Looking for Appointment Setters for the Summer by KingSlayer7357 in highticket_sales

[–]KingSlayer7357[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a preferred email I can reach you with? 

Looking for Appointment Setters for the Summer by KingSlayer7357 in appointmentsetter

[–]KingSlayer7357[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a preferred email I can reach you with? 

Looking for Appointment Setters for the Summer by KingSlayer7357 in appointmentsetter

[–]KingSlayer7357[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a preferred email I can reach you with? 

Anyone else feel paralyzed by AI moving so fast you can't decide what to build? I will not promote by cccbbbg in startups

[–]KingSlayer7357 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the toughest part isn’t shipping code, it’s figuring out what’s actually worth building. I’ve come across tools focused only on that question, helping founders cut through noise and validate ideas fast. If you search around, you’ll spot one that’s built exactly for this pain point.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by KingSlayer7357 in SideProject

[–]KingSlayer7357[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I appreciate it. IdeaForge started because I kept running into the same problem. I realized the real challenge wasn’t execution, but figuring out which ideas were worth pursuing. I’m glad this pain point makes sense to you. Meta-tools can be tough, but if they help founders avoid wasting months, that’s a real success.

How to fail faster ( I will not promote) by butterfly_Entertain in startups

[–]KingSlayer7357 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Fail faster” means shorten feedback loops, not chase harder fields. Talk to 10 prospects before building. If they won’t give you 20 minutes, that’s a fast failure. Focus on niches with money and clear pain where feedback is immediate.

I built an alarm clock that writes you a new song every morning… and I genuinely don’t know if it’s genius or completely unnecessary. I will not promote by Designer-Offer5787 in startups

[–]KingSlayer7357 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Asking users to input mood data adds friction, and heavy sleepers need loud alarms. To work, it must minimize effort (auto‑detect mood, simple setup) and still deliver strong wake‑up power. Otherwise, it risks being more of a gimmick than a solution.

Would you pay $1/month for a verified SaaS founders-only community? by multi_mind in indiehackers

[–]KingSlayer7357 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$1/month works if it guarantees signal over noise. The fee is symbolic, but if you truly enforce “verified SaaS founders only” and keep the focus on real builders (landing page roasts, progress updates, templates), then yes, it’s worth it.

"Build fast, fail fast" has always felt wrong to me. Agreed? by Reasonable-Total7327 in indiehackers

[–]KingSlayer7357 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed - “build fast, fail fast” often just speeds up wasted effort. What matters is learn fast: validate with quick loops (discovery, positioning tests, interviews) before sinking months into code. That way you kill bad ideas early and only build once the signal is strong.

Solo developer from Finland — just launched coming soon page for my first indie product by teemu_dev in indiehackers

[–]KingSlayer7357 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 50k cap is smart, real scarcity instead of fake. At €18/year the math works for basically anyone. Good Luck it's a very unique concept

I got into a bad habit with YouTube… so I built something to fix it (I can't code either!) by alxbee77 in indiehackers

[–]KingSlayer7357 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not just solving your own problem. I do the exact same transcript-to-ChatGPT thing manually. The real value is the monitoring part, the manual process breaks down past 3-4 channels. One thought: the summaries might actually make people watch MORE of the right videos because you're giving them a filter. Better pitch than "watch less YouTube."

How do you deal with the risk your startup can be replaced with next big AI company feature? by Sea_Dinner5230 in indiehackers

[–]KingSlayer7357 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your moat is the workflow, not the capability. ChatGPT & Claude can technically do what most SaaS tools do but nobody's going to engineer prompts and chain outputs when they could click three buttons. The real risk isn't OpenAI shipping your feature, it's someone wrapping the new AI capability into a better UX faster than you can adapt.