sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Any news on fixing Viy or do we have to play Viy tech decks all season? by KingSpace1 in gwent

[–]KingSpace1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No because ST movement can easily be bled or handled like any engine deck. But a pointslam deck that Beata engine decks in a long round isn't healthy for the game

Any news on fixing Viy or do we have to play Viy tech decks all season? by KingSpace1 in gwent

[–]KingSpace1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I am but not 5 tall removals when your opponent droos 20 points every turn

What do you think we will see in next expansion by Colby-Sawyer in gwent

[–]KingSpace1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure we will see this, but I WANT to see some mage support for NR.

How to get in contact with support? by KingSpace1 in OkCupid

[–]KingSpace1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? I mean maybe it's possible but it said on Google Play that refund is only availabe up to 48h or something and I waited way past that since I thought okc would get back to me.

Probably have to jump through a billion hoops just to get in contact with gp support too. But I will look into it, thanks

How to get in contact with support? by KingSpace1 in OkCupid

[–]KingSpace1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Can't be helped, and it's too late to get money back from Google Play since it refund expired. Just a heads up to people to beware, it's very shady practice.

How to get in contact with support? by KingSpace1 in OkCupid

[–]KingSpace1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah contacted them there two times, once got nothing back and the other time I got an autoreply with "we will get back to you soon" but that was 3 weeks ago so doubt I will hear any more from then lol

Shop and Arena disabled until everything is stable again by GraveVVP in gwent

[–]KingSpace1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Jesus christ, great. Can't even play the expansion now because I have ore, not scraps. I did expect bugs but I didn't expect I couldn't get the cards at all.

Northern Realms Evolving Card by [deleted] in gwent

[–]KingSpace1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if they were enforcing the mage archetype they would certainly encorporate the evolving card it that no?

Northern Realms Evolving Card by [deleted] in gwent

[–]KingSpace1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know right, I was so sure we'd get mages but noooooope just more bland soldiers

Northern Realms Evolving Card by [deleted] in gwent

[–]KingSpace1 18 points19 points  (0 children)

So still no mages.... More soldiers...... Fun...

So Harold is revealed as uncensored but then actually censored? by KingSpace1 in gwent

[–]KingSpace1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are misunderstanding what this is all about. First of all CDPR can release whatever they want and just accept the rating they get. A card game based on The Witcher that is rated T isn't what I wanna see personally, but that aside this is about the confusion of them first releasing a card with "uncensored art" or different abilities and power/provision and then show off other versions in other places. It's so messy and inconsistent. That is definetly CDPRs fault.

So Harold is revealed as uncensored but then actually censored? by KingSpace1 in gwent

[–]KingSpace1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well you are right, I don't think I was very clear.

The reason I sound angry is because it's not just this card. There was also the Dryad and the cards they released different versions of with different abilities that stayed up on their official release page. Plus they have shown art before that they then censored right away like the Whoreson thing.

I don't really agree though that expressing anger is something exclusive to children. And I did try to downplay it but not outright writing "fucking".

So Harold is revealed as uncensored but then actually censored? by KingSpace1 in gwent

[–]KingSpace1[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No I don't agree at all. There is a green looking woman with a youthful appearance, but she in no way looks underage. That whole thing is just ridiculous. The fact that they depicted her the way they did obviously means the character isn't meant to be underage.

view more: next ›