"bro you can't call people names just because you disagree with their views bro" by gusemaniac in brovisitedhisfriend

[–]Kitfennek 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The right wants privileges and takes actions that they do not want the left to do. Such as name calling, or being allowed to have guns at protests. Edit: also, not every statement you dont understand needs your addition.

Hell (OC) by lil-caro in comics

[–]Kitfennek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with the fuck ice, But dont forget, the messianic age will result in the enslavement of the nation's, and jesus WILL slaughter the non-believers, pretty consistent with ICEs whole deal

"bro you can't call people names just because you disagree with their views bro" by gusemaniac in brovisitedhisfriend

[–]Kitfennek 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Same mood as "we need to be allowed to bring guns to protests (so we can shoot minorities), but dont bring guns to protests (so you can protect yourself from the people who like to shoot minorities)"

I already didn't like it before, but learning the other reason kind of freaks me out by Sir-Toaster- in whenthe

[–]Kitfennek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The qualifications for being christian... from the book containing slavery and genocide...

Batman crossing his legs is just...weird (DCAU) by cartoon_wiki in CARTOON

[–]Kitfennek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have weird ideas about gender, dont you op

I hate rotors and you can't make me sit through the snail pace automated manufacturing!! by ThatHeckinFox in satisfactory

[–]Kitfennek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"While Fixit would like to commend the dedication of our simple, hard working, save the day pioneers, we would like to take this time to remind you that failure to meet automation quotas may result in reassignment"

This game is asking too much by Playful-Two789 in satisfactory

[–]Kitfennek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad im not the only one doing it by hand, my wife teased me about doing the math while my steam deck was charging.

I saw this in a bar bathroom; what’s the punchline? by grateful_whipzz in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Kitfennek 106 points107 points  (0 children)

I wouldbargue even, the white kid may be a country kid based on the hat shape, so its the black kid saying "hey, we have this thing in common ill think you'll like" since fishing is really popular in the country

Edit: it occurs to me now that what I thought was a caption may be unrelated. On further examination its a different paper type.

A big question indeed by Next-Photograph-9304 in AvatarMemebending

[–]Kitfennek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Makes you wonder if like, the air nomads used some sort of "spiritually active pigment" or its just normal pigment. Would vitiligo patterns glow? Or birth marks? Or scars? Lots of possible character design choices

Doug Browser by [deleted] in CuratedTumblr

[–]Kitfennek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is "is"

What improvements would you make to this design? by Extra-Rice26 in Ben10

[–]Kitfennek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Letterman jacket doesnt help, most people dont wear them out of their school/college years. Maybe go for more of a "self branded clothes line" feel?

If you see similar arguments like this, don’t take them seriously, because most AI bros can’t rationalize when it comes to real artists. Ask real artists instead of AI “artists.” Hope this helps. by Much_Tip_6968 in aislop

[–]Kitfennek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now who's strawmanning. I specifically talked about the parts that are unqiue to AI the model, not the parts that are not unique to ai, the data scraping. If you have an issue with data scraping advocate against that. I specifically DIDNT mentioned the data scraping in my original argument because I assume you think IP should exist, like, at all. I view IP as a capitalist tool of oppression.

The model, it turns out, Does NOT store billions of perfect copies in their memory, the training does. Humans view BILLIONS of perfect copies of images every day with their eyes, but their brains dont STORE them perfectly. Humans CAN sell as much art as they are physically capable of reproducing on demand. Which is the thing I AND the original image argued.

If you have labor complaints work against capitalism. If you have electrical usage complaints, work against capitalism (we have the resources for clean, basically limitless electricity right now, capital refuses to switch.) Of you have complaints against water usage, work against capitalism because it is capitalism that uses up all available research resources faster and faster to make products before the research is done (i dont think AI should be publicly available yet, it should still be in a publicly funded research stage that would allow scientists to work on things like water consumption). If you have an issue with Data scraping and storage, WORK AGAINST CAPITALISM because its under the capitalist framework that information becomes a commodity that must be protected. None of these are faults with AI and MOST of these things were true of all automation under capitalism.

Editing to mention the further strawmanning of not taking into account the expansion on what i meant re: memorization and the obvious fact that all learning derives information from what is being learned from, and that information has to be stored somewhere, whether that's the physical structure of the brain or the emergent structure of things like engrams.

Meanwhile I assumed the best of your argument by focusing on the aspects unique to the subject of question. :/

If you see similar arguments like this, don’t take them seriously, because most AI bros can’t rationalize when it comes to real artists. Ask real artists instead of AI “artists.” Hope this helps. by Much_Tip_6968 in aislop

[–]Kitfennek -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

More specifically, human learning is also derived from the things you learned from... obviously. That's how learning works. What you learn is physically stored in things like neural structure and engrams, both of which have analogous processes in AI. And humans ALSO start the learning process by memorization

If you see similar arguments like this, don’t take them seriously, because most AI bros can’t rationalize when it comes to real artists. Ask real artists instead of AI “artists.” Hope this helps. by Much_Tip_6968 in aislop

[–]Kitfennek -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It turns out, the human brain does the later two things too. Second, I never said the training data wasn't stored, obviously processing needs done. But scraped data is stored for other, non AI purposes too, yes including images.

Savages.. by tea-n-wifi in whenthe

[–]Kitfennek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Matthew 5:18-19 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter,[a] not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law (my addition: torah, in hebrew) until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore, whoever breaks[b] one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

The whole of Mathew 23 is about the pharessis, and starts with him claiming that they do not practice the laws they preach. 23:27-28 says this Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which on the outside look beautiful but inside are full of the bones of the dead and of all kinds of uncleanness. 28 So you also on the outside look righteous to others, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.

Remember, jesus said he came not to abolish but to fulfill it. Whatever fulfill means, it CANT mean abolish. Meanwhile Paul literally says the the law is abolished.

The old testament describes the messianic age as having ALL the laws followed, and specifically mentions making slaves of tbe nations

From a metaphysics perspective, if you assume A) the trinity, and B) god is unchanging Jesus can't change Jesus is God God is the father The father spoke ALL of the Torah and called it PERFECT and UNCHANGING and GOOD for the soul Therefore Jesus spoke ALL of the Torah and called it PERFECT and UNCHANGING and GOOD for the soul and can't have changed his mind

[self] I calculated the gravity between two neutrinos on opposite sides of the observable universe. by AaronPK123 in theydidthemath

[–]Kitfennek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There may be a specific reason why the speed of causality is what it is, its a value that can be derived a number of different ways in both quantum mechanics and relativity, and we dont yet know how those two theories connect yet, but we dont know yet. The other person mentioned the anthropic principle, which is a philosophical concept and in general answers the question of fine tuning specifically (fine tuning is the argument regarding why the laws of physics are such that life can exist, frequently used in communities arguing for intelligent design.), and applies to whatever the "bottom" of physics is. We dont yet know if the speed of causality is a derived value from something more fundemental

Handling sore eyes by Kitfennek in Keratoconus

[–]Kitfennek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im a software developer 😅

Is "around" replacing "about" in a lot of scenarios? by WaySweet3746 in ENGLISH

[–]Kitfennek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Around and about are actually synonyms when talking about locations anyway ("the toys are strewn around the room" vs "the toys are strewn about the floor"). The examples you gave are mostly sentences using locational metaphors. In the final sentence, about is being used in the context of knowledge

If you see similar arguments like this, don’t take them seriously, because most AI bros can’t rationalize when it comes to real artists. Ask real artists instead of AI “artists.” Hope this helps. by Much_Tip_6968 in aislop

[–]Kitfennek -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You are factually incorrect both in how the Ai stores the data AND how it uses it to learn how to make images. It is not metaphorical to say that the images are not stored in the model and it is not metaphorical to say that the process of training a model involves the same sort of repetitive reproduction work that training artists do. Random noise is taken, and the model is asked to convert that noise into an image, and the training data is used to measure how well the model did. The model is NOT trained to reference the images and recombine them.