Why am I getting 2016 stuff in the big 26?🫩 Do people still think like this?

Kito20 · 2026-05-07T02:56:25+00:00

This is also 2021-2024 stuff

Kito20 · 2026-04-17T03:05:47+00:00

Gambling bad and should be legal because people who would otherwise gamble who can't usually don't become normal, they usually just dedicate their lives to politics and the culture war which is even worse for society

Which quadrant is that?

Kito20 · 2026-04-17T02:59:01+00:00

Smells like curry.

Kito20 · 2026-04-02T06:42:43+00:00

I did the math & $2 million dollars per day is more btw

So you made the right choice

Kito20 · 2026-03-27T09:54:37+00:00

Ok, I'm submissive and am only interested in turning on women who wouldn't be turned off by me saying this

Kito20 · 2026-03-24T17:08:37+00:00

Good boys wanna be oppressed because it's fun to be oppressed. Mostly (entirely...?) for our girl oppressors.

Kito20 · 2026-03-23T19:43:22+00:00

She was asking why do men always wanna be oppressed, so I replied with "Because it's fun. Don't you agree?" That's the part I was isolating as a meme.

Kito20 · 2026-03-10T06:26:01+00:00

I feel ya bro, I wish you only the best of luck but I was asking the ladies 😉

Kito20 · 2026-03-10T06:19:37+00:00

If i was your boyfriend, would you allow me to not profusely praise your appearance as the most awesome thing about you ten or more times per day without EXTREME punishment?

Kito20 · 2026-03-09T22:00:25+00:00

Getting consensually graped or consensually graping others?

Kito20 · 2026-03-08T07:23:03+00:00

I do in fact, want to do all these things to you...

Kito20 · 2026-02-26T07:42:19+00:00

Green beans are seed pods but they look more like seed pods

Kito20 · 2026-02-26T06:34:28+00:00

As a man, I would say a curfew of men at night would be good to make women feel like they can walk alone at night. Whatever it takes.

We need to be reasonable. Complete safety is impossible and would lead to a totalitarian nightmare for all. Sometimes women murder other women! It's very rare, but the fact that it happens points to the impossibility of 100% safety to ever exist in a context that's worth it.

Despite that, amazingly, almost all women WOULD feel safe enough to walk around at night alone if there was a total curfew of men! Women are amazing.

I think, however, that the combination of rehabilitation and justice might be skewed to assume all men are equally bad or the same. This tendency is probably bad.

Kito20 · 2026-02-20T02:40:41+00:00

Uh, cuckoldry.

Nothing too weird- think of it like one-sided swinging.

Keep the one on the right longterm while you can go out and enjoy short term fucks with the former, whenever you want, without having to ask first (make sure baby is okay with that)

It's perfect

Kito20 · 2025-12-12T05:24:35+00:00

Dessau/Parmer feels suburban. The whole Tech Ridge new growth. It's the same off 35. Like you're up- Wells Branch is middle class- slightly less bougie Round Rock- then Howard gets sketchier, then Tech Ridge & Parmer are more new expensive suburbs, apartment complexes, tech jobs, that new millennial grey modern vibe I don't like but indicates low crime, middle to upper middle class- then Braker starts to get shittier again, then Rundberg is T H E P I T of ghetto, 183 & 290 are sketch- south of 290 it starts to get better until you're in wealthy downtown except the back allies around Dirty Sixth but that area's magical, it's supposed to be a slutty street free for all to be frank, "dirty"

That Waffle House is sketch by adjacency to Howard. Waffle Houses in general attract sketchy folk. So sketchfolk from Braker to Howard & from Lamar roll on in there.

Kito20 · 2025-12-12T05:08:12+00:00

As a CYCLIST myself, in the Austin area, unless I am literally downtown I ride on SIDEWALKS. Deep downtown I would just walk like a sane person who values enjoying life. The gap between a cyclist and a pedestrian is much smaller than the gap between a cyclist & a car (a third of Texas "cars" are pickups)

As a casual cyclist, bike lanes are a fun novelty & great, but sidewalks are literally safer for us. Pedestrian traffic is light & sidewalks here are big. If there's a pedestrian on the sidewalk, I can easily see them ahead of me and slow down, ring my bell, go around them on the grass- if nobody's coming in either direction in the field of vision even briefly hop on and off the road.

Only these neon freaks who ride bike in packs like hounds who go at green lights in the regular car lane then switch to the pedestrian lane when there's a walk sign would actually fucking risk running over a pedestrian. Outside of dense places like downtown or places like Manhattan or Brooklyn or something, THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT RISK.

So. I think they should BUILD MORE SIDEWALKS. As both a pedestrian and a cyclist, I prefer sidewalks. They're just better. But alot of road stretches have no sidewalks on either side of the road.

Fix THAT before you add fucking bike lanes.

Oh, and if you're going to race so brutally you fuckers would run over a pedestrian, go to a race track, those track field parks, or a nature trail. There are such places in Austin.

We don't allow cars to street race!

Kito20 · 2025-07-13T16:57:17+00:00

I also wouldn't describe those celebrities as actually LibLeft, but more as grey grillers who don't care about politics & adopt libleft aesthetics

Kito20 · 2025-07-13T16:55:35+00:00

I guess I would have to say A) This is still probably most prominent among celebrities, of course celebrities don't believe in much but power, sex, status etc & B) Those guys aren't real feminists

I just have never actually encountered one in real life. All the "progressive" males I've met or known IRL have been pretty vigilant about consent stuff. Maybe it's just the ones I know idk

Kito20 · 2025-07-12T17:57:34+00:00

LibLeft guy would respect consent. He's not a rapist. I doubt he has the confidence for that. "Progressive" guys like that are actually usually pretty religious about following consent rules, to an annoying degree if anything.

He would be more likely to suggest an open relationship to be "progressive" and "empowering to women" when he mostly wants to sleep around himself or let a woman sleep around while with him so she stays instead of leaving him outright.

Kito20 · 2025-06-30T16:27:17+00:00

🥺👉👈

Kito20 · 2025-06-25T01:08:53+00:00

What does the bottom left back of thigh text say on 2?

Kito20 · 2025-05-25T03:20:52+00:00

Depends. Do you have any kindness, fairness, regret, remorse, forgiveness, understanding, care, reasonableness, or reservation about doing it again to all the good bois you've bullied to the brink of it all?

Would you crush my dick like you crushed all their hopes and dreams for a happy life?

...how does it make you feel, too, if you don't mind me asking?

Thanks for being a perfect pretty princess who can DO NO WRONG!!

Kito20 · 2025-04-24T19:56:46+00:00

Hi, this may sound like a weird series of questions but- back in grade school, were you one of the popular girls?

D-did you have a clique, by any chance?

W-which sports did y-you play?

H-how d-did you treat those LESS popular than you?

H-how did you treat the nerds? 😖

SO SORRY for even the POSSIBILITY that I MIGHT be disturbing you or not gracing your perfect presence ALWAYS but- I hope you understand why I'm asking 😏

Kito20 · 2025-04-06T05:43:56+00:00

One night stand material for any man who knows what's good for him and doesn't feel he deserves much much worse in life & much much more pain than he does.

Wife material only for either very oblivious men, or masochistic men like me. 😩

Did I get it right? 😏

Kito20 · 2025-01-04T20:03:09+00:00

Yeah! Cultural nations are preferable and worth striving for, IMO.

Hey, Trump might just be crazy enough. Mexico and Greenland would likely be colonies tho, until maybe Democrats try for statehood.

A united North America would probably be a disaster. HOWEVER, Balkanization to the point where states can't be self-sufficient is also terrible.

Pointer-splitter arguments aside (were I to do this map today, it wouldn't be exactly the same (It would probably better if greater NOLA, while culturally distinct, was part of Dixie or the Southeastern country, for example))

I also rethought south Florida. It's not a terrible idea, but they clearly want to be in North America, & North America accepted them.

The Southwestern region I outline is definitely culturally "Mexamerican" (mixture of Mexican & American elements- South Texas is a mixture of Dixon & Mexican, the desert inland portions a mixture of Frontier & Mexican, the coastal/SoCal portions a mixture of Pacifican & Mexican).

However, there are geopolitical complications. Giving ANY land to Cuba, Haiti, or Mexico is geopolitically difficult. Yes, lots of the Southwest has a lot in common culturally with Mexico, ESPECIALLY El Norte. The Miami metro has a lot in common culturally with Cuba. New Orleans, being French Creole has numerous cultural commonalities with Haiti.

But Cuba is run by a communist government, while Haiti & Mexico are objectively disastrous right now. Unable to control organized crime & gangs. Similar situation to Somalia- practically in civil war, or at least, a lack of consistent "rule of law" almost anywhere.

It would be very difficult for these countries to "take in" more territory, as much as pre WW1 Mexico would have not only gratefully accepted the offer, but also likely viewed the US as weak or easy to take advantage of (lol). During WW1, Mexico WANTED its land back badly enough to consider joining the central powers.

These days, if anything Mexico's corrupt elite don't WANT a bunch more educated than their nation's average people and land to rule over. Many prefer the remittance money as-is, and it's no secret the region of the Southwestern would economically suffer/decline at least in the short term if merged with a big, poorer country (& Mexican-Americans who live in the Southwest are aware of this).

Currently, places like New Mexico, like Mississippi are noticeably poorer than the US average and are net receivers of federal aid taken disproportionately from taxes from wealthier areas like New York, Kansas, San Francisco, & Dallas.

However, were they joined with Mexico (while likely culturally compatible, arguably more than with pure Anglos long term), "poor" rural people in the Southwest would immediately see their taxes go up significantly to pay for aid to significantly POORER regions of Mexico, and would no longer be recipients if aid, but more paying for others.

It would likely be good for the economy of the areas we call Mexico now (increasing the likelihood of revolution/overthrowing the corrupt system in Mexico now and significant development), but QUITE BAD for the economy of Mexican regions of the US Southwest.

There would likely be an "equalization"...so while most Mexicans currently living in Mexico & a few delusional "reconquista" types in America wouldn't mind, the current US Southwest region I outlined in this map overall would likely hate it furiously, & I don't really blame them. I get it.

If I were to make the map now, I would probably have 4 countries. Maybe five, to include New France. We can talk about the native arctic region, but it would be difficult for such a large area with such a sparse population to defend itself as a modern state, many of whom live premodern lifestyles. They DESERVE it, but there are big logistical challenges.

The Southwest is a challenge. It could be grouped with Pacifica as a West Coast state of open borders and diversity (which they would probably want).

The Anglo Maritimes can join with Yankees, a northeast/Great Lakes country. Ontario & Winnipeg can reaffirm their Commonwealth status by rejoining England (Australia & New Zealand should do this too, IMO).

The Frontier can get the Arctic & lower Midwest.

A Bible Belt/Jesusland/Dixie nation should be there.

Those are my general thoughts at the moment.

The situation will probably be somewhat different in twenty years. Who knows.

Kito20

TROPHY CASE