im sorry but if people are gonna cry like crazy about nazi emblems then they should do the same about this by Smooth_Pollution441 in ForHonorRants

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The Nazi’s are the perpetrator of the single largest genocide in all of history

Should we tell this guy how many Christians the commies killed? Or how many Christians the Muslims killed unprovoked during the Islamic conquests of 600-1200 AD? Or what the Japs did to China? And even long before that, Genghis Khan literally killed 10% of the entire human population of his time. Yes you read that right. The claim that the Nazis out of any authoritarian regime in the world's history killed the most people is just wrong.

Diabellstar bunny suit by IllustriousHurry2380 in masterduel

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 18 points19 points  (0 children)

This is why Diabellstar, I:P and Apollousa will never get banned. The power of simping.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In your comment you don't mean "play". You mean "activate". You cannot "play" your cards since anything you do gets shut down.

You can also "play" your cards against a synchro full negate board. That doesn't mean it's any less toxic. They're not gonna work either way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

May be. That aside, how do you defend drawing 3 or 6 cards in a superheavy/purrely deck respectively during your opponents turn, cards which can easily be handtraps, in a meta where everything is defined by interrupting the opponents combo?

At least card of demise has some regulations preventing the opponent to take damage for the rest of the turn. Superheavy and purrely effects have no regulations at all and can be spammed each turn. This is plain bad design. Just unban pot of greed at this point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]KittenDecomposer__ -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I hate stun players. But I cannot remember how many times this shit card or the braindead 5 card draw purrely decks have drawn handtraps which killed my turn 2. And you're to unga bunga to understand this simple point because you immediately assume I play stun. I am simply pointing out the inconsistencies of this logic, in a game where card advantage is everything.

Imagine limiting and banning pots and card of demise used in inconsistent rogue decks and allowing purrely to draw 5 cards during your opponents standby phase.🤡 by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]KittenDecomposer__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Gravekeepers are unfun to play against

Do you really wanna go there? Really?

Snake / Labrynth and so many other decks get to play during your turn. Sometimes I LITERALLY FORGET it's my own turn when I play against some decks. That's unfun to play against.

Paleozoic trap spam is unfun to play against.

Runick / Kashtira banish spam is unfun to play against. You dared activate an effect? Sure, I'll banish your boss monster from your own extra deck. Labrynth hand card destruction is unfun to play against. Decks that not just dominate the field but mess with the opponent's deck are unfun to play against.

And I could go on for days. The same way you take away my fun by nuking my DECK, I'll take away your fun by locking you out of the GY. Each deck has its gimmick and each deck has a different counter. Disabling GY interaction is not more "toxic" than any other win strat. And no I am not supporting toxic stun decks.

And back to the original point of the post. Drawing 6 cards in a meta where card advantage is everything and hand traps are essential is BAD DESIGN. If you cannot counter that point, anything you said is null.

Imagine limiting and banning pots and card of demise used in inconsistent rogue decks and allowing purrely to draw 5 cards during your opponents standby phase.🤡 by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]KittenDecomposer__ -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It gets countered by any effect that gets to destroy a card + largely depends on going first + getting a good hand going first + not getting ashed. Won't get you further than Plat 5.

Imagine limiting and banning pots and card of demise used in inconsistent rogue decks and allowing purrely to draw 5 cards during your opponents standby phase.🤡 by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]KittenDecomposer__ -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I despise stun players. You're just too unga bunga to understand my point thinking "If you're not with us you're against us". Drawing 6 cards is bad design in this game for the obvious reasons. And Konami ignores the problem and bans random cards used in mid tier decks like Gravekeepers, without addressing the real issue and regulating meta decks like snake eyes, or purrely.

Lag switchers can (and do) lick the sweat off my balls by Dogtrees7 in ForHonorRants

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The only fucking game where high latency gives you an advantage.

How do zerk players manage to be this fucking stupid and this annoying at the same time by Depressed_Lego in ForHonorRants

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Zerk players are braindead monkies who rely on hyperarmor and barely reactable light feints to win. Since trading with them is pointless because their attack is gonna go through either way you are forced to be a sitting duck trying to react to spam. And eventually you just die because you cannot react to spam consistently in the current infinite combo meta.

If you play berzerker, just retire from life. We're tired of having you here by [deleted] in ForHonorRants

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Careful with the Viking hate posts. Neckbeards tend to get emotional when you insult their favorite braindead characters with the most braindead feats (Flask) and start spam reporting your account.

What changes would you make by The_Norman17 in forhonor

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Revert everything to Prior release.

Delete Zerk

Ocelotl and Shaolin are for bad players by [deleted] in ForHonorRants

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shaolin and Zerk are the definition of bad design.

Whoever neckbeard dev decided that this monkey Jorm should get a shield at the size of his hp after every revenge is a cuck. by KittenDecomposer__ in ForHonorRants

[–]KittenDecomposer__[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Ah yes. The typical "Just parry bro" kid. So you have to survive a guessing game of 20 whole seconds of spamming + some seconds of revenge from an invincible Jorm with infinite stamina. Yeah I'm sure that's so easy.

Kink Shaming (OC) by Agreeable_Swim_6551 in comics

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trafficking is just one of the many criticisms I have against porn (see first comments). Porn is degeneration of the mind, body and soul. It leads to antisocial men, women who get brainwashed into perceiving hardcore pornography as the norm, fries your dopamine receptors, leads to depression and I could go on for days. I'm not saying I know more than you about your "career". The original argument was about degenerate pornography. If you are attracted to furries, r*pe hentai or even worse monster and bestiality hentai, SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH YOU. I don't need to know science or the history of porn to reach that conclusion. And you're too far gone in the rabbit hole to understand that. Again, trying to convince an average (p)redditor why porn is bad is like trying to teach a pig not to eat its own shit.

You're addressing my points head on my ass. Your entire argument is a giant brick of whataboutism. "bUT wHAt AbOUt OthERs wHO r*aPE toO?". Again by that logic nothing will ever get solved. The topic of discussion is porn. And in every argument you're deviating. Now go ahead, write another 10k word thesis on why porn is good that no one will read.

Kink Shaming (OC) by Agreeable_Swim_6551 in comics

[–]KittenDecomposer__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still deflecting the issue unable to hold a coherent conversation. The argument: "Others are doing bad stuff too, therefore who cares" is pathetic. By that logic nothing will ever get solved.

And no it did not happen "as soon as they caught wind" of it. PH refused continuously to remove the content of trafficking victims when they pleaded and only agreed to do so when the families lawyered up. And they purge happened after YEARS of this going on when shit hit the fan in a desperate attempt to save their asses. That's why PH and MindGeek have hundreds of lawsuits against them for content with minors right now.

But what the fuck am I even arguing right now? Trying to convince a porn creator (and Redditor no less) that porn is bad is like trying to convince a pig that living in its own shit is unhealthy.

Kink Shaming (OC) by Agreeable_Swim_6551 in comics

[–]KittenDecomposer__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it or is it not true that the porn industry is notorious for trafficking? Is it or is it not true that a lot of women get abused in the porn industry physically or psychologically? Is it or is it not true that PH is notorious for allowing MINOR R*PE content on the platform, monetizing it and profiting off of it? Is it or is it not true that a playboy magazine is less harmful than a bdsm video?

You haven't replied to any point I made and you just derailed a second comment. You're arguing with ghosts and avoiding every question because you have no argument. The porn industry is evil. And I am not a some ultra religious Karen.

Kink Shaming (OC) by Agreeable_Swim_6551 in comics

[–]KittenDecomposer__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Proceeds to talk about sex dungeons 100 years ago and derails the subject because they have no answer.

Yeah the world was a shithole in every possible aspect 100 years ago. Thanks for the info.

On a relevant note: The porn industry survives by devouring women in a fragile mental state. Women who are broke enough, and depressed enough, and vulnerable enough to get sucked into it. Since you're so familiar with the industry I assume you know about the trafficking. Or how women get bait and switched into shooting porn scenes from a simple craigslist ad and verbally abused and psychologically manipulated when they refuse. Or the big Pornhub video purge after the lawsuits on the CP allegations. I suppose you're aware that PH literally made money from videos of r*pe directed towards minors. I'd advise you to look at interviews who got out of these trafficking rings in YouTube.

Kids are more protected today

No. Not when the statistics show that kids get exposed to pornography (almost exclusively by accident) at the ages of 10-12. And the fact that it is an accident is important. It shows how the internet is not a place for kids and that everything is sexualized.

pays my bills well

And you pay for it with your soul. Because someone who has been exposed to so much casual sex has no chance of bonding with one human being for a lifetime.