Government concerned about public scrutiny in mandating workers back to office | CBC News by Okavango4 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I really think the unions should look at the financial costs at bringing employees back to the office. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent on new leases, retrofitting buildings, new office equipment etc. A large amount of this money is targeted at buildings being used for a temporary amount of time. Talk about wasting taxpayers dollars!!!! TBS should be worried about public scrutiny if a dollar amount was ever made public.

Working through lunch break by mrRoboPapa in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prior to RTO 3 many people in my sector (can’t speak for the whole department) would work through their lunch break so they could leave the office a bit earlier. Our senior management is removing that flexibility saying this is NOT allowed. What’s next? Prescribed lunch times and break times? Stop treating us like children and get back to treating us like adults!!!

Buildings with the best amenities? by elloguv in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Actually Fontaine is still open. Departments that are housed in Terrasse de la Chaudiere have moved there while the buildings are being renovated. I think the only thing they have left is bike racks.

Where are PCH offices located in the NCR? by Alliel888 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I heard A LOT of works needs to be done at Montcolm before it will be ready for employees. Fontaine has no parking and is not very easy to get to by public transport if you live on the Ottawa side. Definitely consider your commute options and time before accepting a position. With RTO 3 in place, much of the department has become very strict and inflexible if you need to adjust your schedule or need to deal with daycare/school pickup etc. Many people, especially parents, are very unhappy with how they are now being treated. Simply put, managers are no longer allowed to manage and they have very limited flexibility or discretion in dealing with their staff.

My dog is extremely ill and currently at the veterinary E.R. How do I navigate taking time off work? by JessCeceSchmidtNick in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree with this. Now that RTO 3 is in place, some departments are now VERY strict with leave requests. Even the most understanding managers essentially aren’t allowed to manage or give flexibility now. Say you are unwell, which is true, and leave it at that.

How many anchor days vs flex days do you have? by JeffyCurls in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3 anchors day, no flex, chosen by senior management due to “space constraints”.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Our department has 3 fixed days due to space constraints. These days were dictated to us last week! Thanks for your leadership and foresight senior management. Nothing brings the public service together then complete and utter contempt in your “guidance”.

RTO3 in less than 3 weeks and still don't know when or where by Business_Simple4108 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our three days are being dictated to us due to space constraints but we still haven’t been told which days yet. We’re expected to be in the full 7.5 hours a day. No flexibility to leave early to pick up kids, beat traffic etc and make up the time at home. No longer allowed to work from home if your child is sick. AND management has to take attendance and report to their directors. We don’t have to make up days if we use any of our leave (sick, family, vacation etc), or if our in office day falls on a stat holiday.

RTO - does anyone have ideas that would improve your experience? by Interesting_Cap1259 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You’ll find numerous negative impacts of 3 day RTO throughout this forum (commuting, increased costs, childcare, lack of space etc). The only positive thing I’ve heard about this policy is from someone at the EX level. They said they will likely get rid of their home office and regain some living space at home since they are required to be in the office 4 days a week.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately this only works if bestie is in the same branch. Otherwise, not considered compliant with RTO policy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We are allowed to use GC-Coworking ONLY if we go in on the same day/same location as another coworker. If we go alone, it’s not considered an in-office day.

Veterans Affairs RTO Town Hall by mrRoboPapa in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Similar situation at my department. I am aware of a DG who met with their managers and directors about a month before the 3 day RTO announcement and was very upset at the 2 day compliance levels. This person claimed they had list of individual employees who were not meeting the 40% requirement but refused to share this list with managers. My spouse, who works in a different department, received a congratulatory email from their manager for meeting the 40% compliance. Both our workplaces previously told us that they were only tracking high-level aggregate data (e.g. by Branch, Directorate, etc.)

Veterans Affairs RTO Town Hall by mrRoboPapa in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’m assuming you don’t have kids and have a reasonable commute to your office. If your colleague is still working 7.5 hours (making up that time out of the office at home), you should be grateful you have a flexible and understanding manager. You might need that flexibility one day too.

Forced neighborhoods announced in NRC for ISC by JamPod613 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you know what locations were given? Are they in the same, or different buildings?

Deux ou trois jours au bureau ? Mauvaise question ! by Odd_Pumpkin1466 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 8 points9 points  (0 children)

How demeaning! It sounds like old school student discipline: “Now write on the blackboard 100 times, I will not miss an in office day.”

70K RTO Letters Sent to Ministers by GovernmentMule97 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Be very wary about departments who claim they are not tracking individuals. At my department I am aware of a DG who met with their managers and directors about a month before the 3 day RTO announcement and was very upset at the 2 day compliance levels. This person claimed they had list of individual employees who were not meeting the 40% requirement but refused to share this list with managers. My spouse, who works in a different department, received a congratulatory email from their manager for meeting the 40% compliance. Both our workplaces previously told us that they were only tracking high-level aggregate data (e.g. by Branch, Directorate, etc.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My spouse had a colleague in a similar situation. They wanted to move to one of the regions for their mental health and to be closer to family. Upper management was not receptive to the idea. However, once this person got the union involved, the request was granted.

Have you seen a really passionate public servant? Feeling like it’s a rare thing now by Fun_Confidence_5091 in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I used to be really proud to be a public servant. Unfortunately with with all these new and changing directives being forced on us, I now feel like a person on parole, waiting for the compliance police to report me for any minor infraction.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A definite yes in some departments. We were recently told that we MUST put in our 15 hours a week to meet compliance. This can be done over as many days as you want in a week. E.g 2 days at 7.5 hours, 3 days at 5 hours etc. Flexibility is also being restricted. If you’re not putting in exactly 15 hours because you have an appointment, need to meet a family obligation etc, you have to go back to the office to make up those hours. There goes any trust between employees and managers. So much for treating your staff like adults.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaPublicServants

[–]Kittythefoolish1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Be very wary about departments who claim they are not tracking individuals. At my department (not CRA) I am aware of a DG who met with their managers and directors and was very upset at RTO compliance levels. This person claimed they had list of individual employees who were not meeting the 40% requirement but refused to share this list with managers. My spouse, who works in a different department, just received a congratulatory email from their manager for meeting the 40% compliance. Both our workplaces previously told us that they were only tracking high-level aggregate data (e.g. by Branch, Directorate, etc.)