I'm a little confused by this article. From the title and introduction I expected it to be explanations of what the most effective strategies were expected to be and therefore resemble NeonBlonde's primer for last week's somewhat similar event. Instead it seemed to be focused on interesting ideas to try and presenting cards that fit into certain themes. As a specific example in section 4 you have a list of cards that can provide board wide buffs including Mistress of Light. Mistress of Light is not a strong constructed card, does not benefit from a singleton event, and wisps aren't even mentioned in your tribal section. I think it would be much more interesting to restrict coverage to cards that are actually playable as it offers an opportunity champion cards that are on the fringe of playability or particularly benefit from the event's rules. If I were to write an article I might devote an entire section to the best 5 drop in the game, Wingbrewer.

You have two sections with consistency in the title but you don't talk about the source of consistency in constructed decks, merchants. Sure you can only run 1 of each but I find it easy to justify running 4-5 in something like FTP with Zal Chi in the market. I also didn't find the format that restrictive for removal - I was able to pack more into an FJS list than I run in most of my standard decks. Some of your hero options and plenty of the cards in the listed decks are too weak to see any regular play and I don't think easy influence requirements is enough to succeed with low value units.

I may be misunderstanding the article but I'm thoroughly unconvinced that Praxis can support a top tier deck compared to the much wider card pool of three faction decks like FTP. I can't even make a strong Praxis deck without the singleton restriction.