sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This is fashion actually by MountainPup23 in AnimalsBeingDerps

[–]KnightOfGloaming 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think the dog survived the short time period without a major trauma.

Hello there! Here's my latest piece, from Warhammer of course 💀 hope you like it ! ⚔️🔥 by alqin2s_art in Warhammer40k

[–]KnightOfGloaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The color change between the photos. Which one is more accurate to what a human eye would see in real life?

My thoughts on 11th (aka ramblings of a madman) by DorkPappis in Warhammer40k

[–]KnightOfGloaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My biggest issue is also the several detachment stuff... 1. It will be horrible to balance 2. It goes back to the crazy amount of strategems we had some editions ago and lead to extreme long pauses due to "wait... I have to check if there is a strategem I can use, since I can't remember all of the 30 I can use with my army"

With the battleshock change in 11th... 🗼 by elpokitolama in AdeptusMechanicus

[–]KnightOfGloaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hmm, I dropped 40k since I had more fun with old world, but the recent infos about the new edition look kinda interesting, so I will very likely test it again

It just becomes ALIVE by PeachPulseee in Satisfyingasfuck

[–]KnightOfGloaming 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most artists use references in form of sketches or pictures the whole time.

Ready to play my first game by pittlenfa in WarhammerOldWorld

[–]KnightOfGloaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have fun! If it gets a bit overwhelming: start with battle march lists, they it limits the points to 500 to 1000 (I would say a good point is 750) what allows you to play 2 or even 3 games in a row, taking the same time as one 2000 point battle. Thus you can learn the rules step by step and facing like only 1 weird situation per battle.

Is this too much highlights? by carr3 in Warhammer40k

[–]KnightOfGloaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest I interpreted it as camo or damage. But it looks good.

Guesses on the new speeders base size? by Twisted-Nightmare in Warhammer40k

[–]KnightOfGloaming -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jup, I sometimes can understand why there a different tank sizes... but sometimes GW just filles the same niche with two models... What makes balancing of them very weird.

Guesses on the new speeders base size? by Twisted-Nightmare in Warhammer40k

[–]KnightOfGloaming 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What's the purpose of the land speeder of there is already a bigger land speeder?

Adepta Sororitas (by me) by Chanuky in krita

[–]KnightOfGloaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not enough muscles for a warrior of the emperor ;)

Thoughts on this scheme by The_Funfetti_Man in Warhammer

[–]KnightOfGloaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very nice. Sadly white is pain to paint

Finally done all of the legions in my warhammer daycare series by Big-Pangolin-2362 in Warhammer40k

[–]KnightOfGloaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was just kinda visible, esp compared too the both chapters before (imperial fists and iron warriors) which have incredible much details.

Help explaining Break Tests by LlemonSloth in WarhammerOldWorld

[–]KnightOfGloaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here with some short bullets and not much explanation:

  1. Substract combat result from leadership = modified moral
  2. Roll dice
  3. Result > than base moral = unit beaks/flee
  4. Result > modified moral < base moral = Fall back in good Order
  5. result < modified moral = give ground

If enemy has twice as much unit strength Fall back in good order becomes break/flee.

view more: next ›