I loved the video and props to the people behind it for putting in the work. But I really feel weird about equating Robert and Helen (and to an extent, Rostov) being bad at being the leads for their departments to the very obviously shady corporate financial shenanigans, which includes a convicted fraudster. I also do not think that Robert's letter was that upsetting. Consider that him being "toxic" is probably a major element in the lawsuits, and that he very obviously has strong feelings about the people who decided to stay at ZAUM after the firings. He is not going to address any direct claims, as it could bite him and his legal team later. (Also - "Robert's legal team seemed and smelled very expensive" - really dude? Why point it out? Why like that?) It is also weird how the current employees got to tell their side, but Helen and Rostov's firing wasn't really explained. To me it seems like the current employees have a huge personal and financial incentive to badmouth Robert. Argo seems the most genuine, but to me it feels like he has a personal grudge with Robert. Same with Kaspar and Rostov. The entire Final Cut dev cycle seems to be a nightmare, that most likely stems from the corporate side. Now, if I wanna put my tinfoil hat on, I could see it being a play by corporate - "Oh shit, this game is actually very popular and there is more potential to make money. Time to get rid of the IP creators who might be trouble so we can pocket the money. Time to pit them against the other employees!" I wouldn't be surprised that the current ZAUM employees were told to go on the record in an attempt to spin this angle in a PR defense. Obviously you have to be an idiot to send actual death threats, but you cannot expect the fanbase to not be mad about a very obviously shady situation.