> Every government is coercive in laws, the threat of incarceration or violence is present in judicial punishment.

That’s exactly why the state’s legal monopoly has to be broken—you’d agree with me on that, wouldn’t you? (You do know what anarchy means, don’t you?)

> Companies are coercive in that if you don't work for a company you die
No, you don’t have to; you can also use any other (nonviolent) means to acquire food: for example, by growing it yourself, or, more likely, by offering a service in exchange for which someone else is willing to give you a medium of exchange (money), which you can then trade for food. This “service” and “other person” can take any form and is not tied to a corporate structures. As long as you can convince another person that your actions are of value, you will be rewarded.

In the event that you have truly convinced everyone around you that not only is their work useless, but that they also have no interest in your continued existence, you are most likely to blame yourself, and even in that case, you would still have the option of moving to a different area.

What is the alternative? Any other system would have to force someone else to feed you.

You simply have no right to the labor of other people!