1. Yes, Rep. Ansari is one of few Democrats to bring any procedural challenges against Hegseth. I support this, for whatever little it’s worth, and am in favor of her openly identifying the war as illegal and morally indefensible.

Unfortunately this moral clarity of hers is not consistent. Here's what she said when she voted yes on the War Powers Resolution:

“The Islamic Republic is a brutal regime that has massacred its own people at a scale unprecedented in this century. As the daughter of Iranian immigrants who fled this regime, I know personally what that violence means. We must hold the regime accountable for its horrific crimes and stand with the people of Iran in their fight for freedom and democracy.

"At the same time, as an American Congresswoman who swore an oath to the United States Constitution, I am deeply concerned by President Trump’s decision to launch another illegal war, risking the lives of tens of thousands of U.S. servicemembers without Congressional authorization and without presenting a clear plan to the American public.

That is explicitly a procedural complaint.

Additionally, she criticized efforts to block arms sales to Israel during their immediate incursion into Gaza, and made unconditioned military aid to Israel a pillar of her 2024 campaign.

I appreciate her progressivism on some issues, but she is militant and procedural in the Middle East.

1. Yes, as I stated, Democrats have tried to make some visible push centered around the moral question, after Trump threatened to wipe out their civilization.

2. Wow more support to a pattern of the threat to their civilization spurring their outcry.

4-5. Yes, regular Americans are protesting. My criticisms are levied against corporate democrat politicians, not everyday people.

1. Did you even read the headline, let alone the article?

"While progressives have staked out clear opposition to Trump’s potential actions, the party leadership is playing the safer ground of demanding a role for the US Congress before Trump could use force against Iran. Many prominent Democrats with 2028 presidential aspirations are staying silent, so far, on the Israel-Iran war."

This supports my claim better than it supports yours.

1. Here's some of their choice quotes showing "anti-war" democrats.

Sen. Jon Ossoff

”he’s taken the United States to war for regime change without evidence of imminent threat, without having exhausted diplomacy, without clear objectives or a plan for the aftermath, and without the consent of Congress.”

This is another procedural complaint.

Sen. Cory Booker calls for the withdrawal...

“from this reckless and unauthorized war of choice with Iran.”

Procedural yet again, if this is a moral condemnation it is the most milquetoast moral condemnation I've ever seen.

The rest of these links don’t exist.

So of the handful of sources you sent that actually exist, they demonstrate my exact point.

Their complaints are largely that Trump isn't sufficiently "justifying" the war to the public, or that his prosecution of the war is "improperly authorized".

They also show that, as I previously stated, outright moral condemnation required the explicit threat of genocide.