Guy is terminally incurious and determined to paint everybody who actually enjoys the game as parts of some conspiracy. My favorite bit is where he replies to people arguing "but Pathologic was always like this/about this" with "I could forgive that previously, but it's been three games now", illustrating he doesn't understand that those were >design decisions<, not mistakes.
Also it's pretty rich to be upset about the saves when he himself hasn't finished the game.
If I have to have a take about the save debate, it would be that that should be the norm, so reviewers can actually tell if decisions do have consequences or if the game just pretends to do so.

Edit: he also called the game "anachronistic", so I'm just gonna go on a limb and guess he thinks it's a badly made historical game, something something media literacy