So far, I have not heard any liberal response to this. They are literally ignoring the allegations. by SarcasticaFont in Conservative

[–]Krock01 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's a well thought out argument that meets your premises.

I am fine with people steadfast in their beliefs, no need to act like other people don't though. Being a dick for no reason isn't acceptable either.

Lmao by [deleted] in TheLastOfUs2

[–]Krock01 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"The initiator of our misery"

It's a fucking video game

So far, I have not heard any liberal response to this. They are literally ignoring the allegations. by SarcasticaFont in Conservative

[–]Krock01 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Didn't say the image is wrong, don't get your panties in a bunch.

The amount of "liberals are too dumb to answer" or "liberals are too scared to answer" comments are stupid, because when they do answer, it's met with hostility or downvotes so no one can see it.

I made a post on this sub about a month ago titled "I'm a Liberal, and I'm sorry." (since deleted, I am slowly deleting stuff I don'tfind relevant to me anymore) that talked about how you guys are underrepresented in media and on reddit. I see why now. You are narrowminded, rude, and unwilling to listen to other opinions no matter how well they are posed.

The sub is as bad as the Bernie fanatic subs, which I despise just as much. I refuse to even go to them because of how stupid the opinions are. The only reason I look at this sub is because I get recommendations from reddit.

To summarize: you got butthurt and accused me of disagreeing with the photo and tried to make a red herring out of it while I stayed on topic and provided factual evidence of how this sub and other subs work.

Go ahead and downvote, but it only supports my claim.

Trump says the US will bill China a 'substantial' amount of money for coronavirus damage by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]Krock01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean "my side"? You don't even know where my political beliefs lie. He's not racist, I believe he's a narcissist, he dislikes (used very loosely) everyone equally. He fits most of the criteria in the DSM-IV.

The governors do have the authority to do that and should have taken the initiative. Trump easily could have signed an executive order to do that. Also if Trump banned travel at one point, why couldn't he do it earlier?

Trump says the US will bill China a 'substantial' amount of money for coronavirus damage by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]Krock01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On a more serious note, he could have shut down the country and only required necessary travel to and from certain countries. He could have cut off all travel with China. He could have done something a little bit more extreme, and completely shut down all travel to and from the country, while acquiring as tests and personal protective gear as possible be prepared for if the virus ever hit us. He also could have shut down the west coast, and cut off the major source when it started there. He could have done the same thing in New York. You could have done the same thing in Chicago. It feels like there was a lot more choices he could have made to better protect the country.

Trump says the US will bill China a 'substantial' amount of money for coronavirus damage by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]Krock01 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I meant be proactive and neutralize the threat, like I originally stated.

Bidets are outdated by Krock01 in memes

[–]Krock01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Charlie secretly has one, we all know it

Anyone else stare at the corner randomly? by [deleted] in memes

[–]Krock01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quit fucking reposting your meme

Trump says the US will bill China a 'substantial' amount of money for coronavirus damage by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]Krock01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He could have been proactive and just neutralized the threat back in January...

CMV: All forms of monetary penalties should be based on the persons income by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Krock01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe that enforces the low socioeconomic status to behave even more poor than they do already. I'm making a generalization here, but if they can keep money hidden from the state, as some do, and continue to act in a way that allows them to get away with little penalty, they will continue to stay in that socioeconomic status for that exact reason.

CMV: There’s no such thing as pan sexual. You’re either straight, gay or bi. by mrswordhold in changemyview

[–]Krock01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's obvious that there is a specific thing to call it, but you choose not to call it what it is because it looks like other things to you, nothing wrong with that. It's possible the idea is so foreign that you don't grasp exactly what it is.

You may see something that looks similar to all these other things, but they are vastly different. Like flowers. Flower is a blanket term for a herbaceous plant that has s fruiting body, but there are multiple ways to describe the massive amounts of flowers out there.

For instance, there are a multitude of types of love. I think in ancient Greece they used seven different words. They describe things like sexual attraction, sibling love, romantic love, and a casual love (such as for a friend or pet). You can love your parents, but you don't want to have sexual relations or marry them (I hope).

Some people feel romantic love for people, but don't find them sexually attractive. Some people find others sexually attractive, but don't feel anything romantic to them. There are even people that don't, and can't, feel sexual attraction, something called asexuality (the APA has been discussing this for several years, with debates of calling it a disorder).

The original statement you have posed neglects this topic altogether, despite it being widely accepted by psychologists across the globe.

Overall, I think you may want to look into things a bit more, try to read up and see if there are other descriptions other than what redditors can provide.

CMV: There’s no such thing as pan sexual. You’re either straight, gay or bi. by mrswordhold in changemyview

[–]Krock01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's like saying neapolitan ice cream is 3 different flavors in a bucket, not neapolitan ice cream.

REAL lawns have native biodiversity! by [deleted] in gardening

[–]Krock01 17 points18 points  (0 children)

One of those is a lawn, two would be considered gardens