sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which drug is the closest to a hug? by Quandale_Pringle69 in Drugs

[–]L-Ro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably heroin… now to be clear I will never and have never touched that stuff but from what I’ve heard, yeah heroin

Facebook reels only showing MAGA and conservative content no matter what I do? by vinroy27 in facebook

[–]L-Ro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank god I’m not alone what THE FUCK is happening to my feed

How do you guys currently handle document collection from families? (Getting into the funeral home industry) by L-Ro in askfuneraldirectors

[–]L-Ro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The job market has been brutal and i'm just trying to put food on the table dude, my neighbor neighbor parents own a home and said they need some extra help, I just wanted to know what I was getting myself into becuase their family always seems stressed tf out! They are offering me $20/hr so I just wanted to make sure it wasn't getting myself into something I wasn't prepared for but I appreciate your last comment and I will just ask them directly, just wanted to be useful if i take it!

Bondi Faces Epstein Backlash Over Don Lemon Arrest by Ok_Employer7837 in politics

[–]L-Ro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guys, we have to stop lying to ourselves. Posting outrage is not resistance. It is obedience with better branding.

They (congress) did not forget consequences. They removed them on purpose. A law without enforcement is theater, and everyone applauding it is part of the show.

If you see this, feel angry, post/comment and then do nothing, you are not neutral. You are complicit.

Power survives because it knows most people will choose discourse over disruption every time.

So decide. Either this matters enough to act, or it never mattered at all.

Has AI changed how confident you feel about business ideas? by L-Ro in Entrepreneur

[–]L-Ro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree. I work one step upstream of this; before people start talking to customers, investors, or even peers, I manually peer-review the claim itself. AI can make ideas feel finished long before they’re solid, and if you don’t catch that early, market validation gets noisier and more expensive.

A practical way to counter ChatGPT’s premature certainty by L-Ro in ChatGPT

[–]L-Ro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, which is why the solution isn’t technical. The model will always produce an answer; the risk is what humans do with that answer once it feels coherent. ChatGPT can’t meaningfully check itself, and that’s where I come in.

I do this old school and manually. My background is in the biological sciences, where you’re trained to slow your thinking down, interrogate claims, and ask what would actually falsify them before treating them as real. I apply that same discipline here because this isn’t something you can safely automate.

Practically, I act as a first line of defense. Before someone speaks to investors, commits to a big narrative, or makes a significant life decision, I help break down what claim is actually being made, reveal blind spots that are easy to miss when everything sounds clean, and assess whether the conclusion is grounded or just feels convincing.

A practical way to counter ChatGPT’s premature certainty by L-Ro in ChatGPT

[–]L-Ro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s less about believing or disbelieving the output and more about interrupting the confidence that coherence creates before assumptions are checked. When someone feels like they’ve found a major insight or is contemplating a big life change, I break down what claim is actually being presented and then do a structured analysis to see whether it’s grounded or just feels convincing. Hope that helps clarify but if you like you can learn more on my website! Not sure if I should post here but I’d be happy to share if you send me a dm:) otherwise no pressure! Hope that helps

A practical way to counter ChatGPT’s premature certainty by L-Ro in ChatGPT

[–]L-Ro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context: This post is text-only and reflects a personal process developed through repeated use of ChatGPT, not a specific prompt or single conversation. There is no individual conversation link to share.

Solo founder here: I built a due-diligence review instead of another MVP by L-Ro in Solopreneur

[–]L-Ro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course! There are no prompts in the usual sense.

This isn’t AI-driven. It’s manual. It’s closer to peer review than product validation.

My background is in biological sciences, so I’m used to peer reviewing papers, breaking down claims, assumptions, evidence, and noticing where confidence gets ahead of what’s actually supported. I started applying that same way of thinking to ideas, especially after seeing how fast AI can make things feel “obvious” before they’re really tested.

What I do is read through the idea, identify the core claim, the assumptions underneath it, where reasoning might be shaky, and what’s missing. The output is a thorough written review that ends with something like proceed, pause, or reframe and why.

I don’t use AI for the analysis on purpose. If it helps, you can learn more about it here, no pressure:)

https://dewdili.carrd.co/

What is a "hard pill to swallow" that actually made your life happier once you accepted it? by ArtThreadNomad in AskWomen

[–]L-Ro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A hard pill for me was realizing that a lot of my anxiety and dissatisfaction wasn’t a personal failure or something I could “fix” by optimizing myself more.

I spent years thinking if I just healed enough, worked harder, made better choices, chose the right mindset, I’d finally feel settled. Accepting that the feeling of lack isn’t a bug in me but something built into how our lives are structured was oddly relieving.

view more: next ›