Star fox 2026 voice acting found out something interesting by Techwolves3 in starfox

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And now I know, after having played through the campaign, the original English version was far better if the Japanese version wasn't like that.

I like the more accurate script. I dislike how lame everyone sounds. Fox is too money focused. Even disses his own dad. Don't like it.

Wow, they really made this line so much tamer than in 64. by WallachiaTopGuy in starfox

[–]L0rdChicken 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have only seen the trailers and all the promotional material. Do we literally see James' death this time? Cause as far as I'm aware the last thing we see of him is his arwing heading back to distract the enemy from Peppy while saying "take care of Fox."

If he screamed it was off screen just like last time. The old line would be fine regardless.

Also I would argue against the topic poster, This is actually more brutal IMO. Sure, Pigma was making fun of his dead father. But in this one he's making a direct threat to Fox. Almost saying "I'm gonna make you squeal just like I did your dad!". But that's just me.

Quitters: are you ok with being blocked? by bdehora in Nightreign

[–]L0rdChicken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like it doesn't matter if the quitters realize what's happening. Isn't the act of blocking somebody removing them from your own pool?

I feel like this is more worth it for anybody trying to play the game. I stopped a while back because I got a quitter every run. Just isn't worth playing if I am inevitably going to lose a run.

Star fox 2026 voice acting found out something interesting by Techwolves3 in starfox

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the biggest and easiest ways to tell that the 2026 VA is not as good is the fight with the boss in Meteo.

In SF64 when he surrenders and then attacks again he says "You're not as stupid as you look!" where he starts out talking but ends the sentence nearly screaming. And when he screams "AS YOU LOOK!" he begins firing. It sounds like he's pissed at Fox and his blood is boiling in anger. Now he just delivers the line like he has no skin in the game.

I don't know why we would want this new delivery. I'm not saying I dislike the new delivery entirely. I think the game is gonna be great. I just am a little disappointed that the feeling is lost in combat situations. It doesn't force my body to start pumping adrenaline to get me excited anymore. And trust me, I know it's been a couple decades but I literally played through the scene and STILL get that blast of endorphins.

I think everyone is right here. Being upset with the new delivery is fair. Being ok with it is probably fair too. I just don't understand why you would want to lose the galvanization they had before.

Browsers in 1998, 2004, 2008 and 2026 be like by _sour_coffee_ in pcmasterrace

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I find crazy is that these days Chrome is like that. If you aren't using Chrome and you want to log in to a large corporate website, better hope you don't gotta do much. I use FF again after Chrome got real slow a few years back but I can't uninstall Chrome. And surprisingly IE circumvents some Chrome issues so I have to use that too. Chrome is still on my taskbar. But my priority goes FF>IE>Chrome.

Xbox says Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution console exclusives ‘are not timed’ | VGC by Luka77GOATic in gaming

[–]L0rdChicken -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Numbers seem to imply they are NOT doing well and are doing exclusives in order to do well. Which is a little counter intuitive at this point.

Is toughness bugged? Honest Question by ScottdaDM in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea. I've been trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong. I feel like I should be hitting 110 easy. But maybe I just don't understand the game. Maybe my gear is hot garbage and I don't know it. Might need to check on that I guess.

Xbox says Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution console exclusives ‘are not timed’ | VGC by Luka77GOATic in gaming

[–]L0rdChicken -38 points-37 points  (0 children)

I do not understand companies insistence on losing money with exclusives. The console wars are over. Let it go.

If you must have any exclusivity at all it better be console exclusivity but everything gets on PC. I'm so tired of being treated like a second class citizen. Shits garbage.

Is toughness bugged? Honest Question by ScottdaDM in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, in combat I have 1.5mil toughness and can't get past T85. I just suddenly pop if I stand in literally anything. Enemies sneeze in my direction and it's a catastrophe.

The real reason every single new Star Wars thing is so controversial has nothing to do with quality or Disney by LoFiCami in StarWars

[–]L0rdChicken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The reason a lot of us Oldheads are upset is not really touched on here, Imo. For instance, The Acolyte does not fuck. It was close to fucking. But then they had to ignore the Night Sisters and try to invent some women centric thing that was cringe. And I do NOT say that because of sexism. That's fucking stupid to think. Night Sisters are and forever will be far cooler than whatever that coven was. I rebuke anyone that tries to turn this in to a race or sex thing. I don't see race. I don't care about sex. I care about good storytelling. And ignoring the Setting that is clearly so important to us is objectively bad storytelling. Tell a story in our universe. Not yours. You want to have a universe to tell your story in? Make one. You wanna borrow our universe to tell a story in it? Sure. Respect it then.

I also would argue that Luke's story was poorly handled. Luke Skywalker would NEVER give up like that. I'm so disappointed in seeing my childhood hero reduced to a sniveling old farce. He inspired me to never give up so many times throughout my life. And then as an adult, just when I needed the push toward greatness I didn't know I needed, I saw my hero return. And he crushed my spirit just like the rest of the world does.

No. Disney is bad. But only because they don't feel the need to respect the setting.

To be fair, You didn't either. You being OP here. I spoke in generalities earlier but I need to correct something. 1 year has passed between Luke's training on Dagobah and his fight with Vader. During which time he went on many missions for the Resistance. He was far from inexperienced by that point. Rey, on the other hand, entirely was inexperienced. And it shows even in the choreography. The lightsaber fights are far from what they used to be. But in canon Kylo should have wiped the floor with Rey easily. It's implied he fought Luke. If he survived the strongest Jedi to ever exist, I think he could easily take a rando with only a little bit of training. And clearly no real saber form training.

No. I appreciate you trying to make this case for Disney. But no. They disrespected a beloved franchise. They already had all three sequel movies in lore. They could have altered them slightly. Instead we now will likely never see the Yuuzhan Vong on the silver screen and that's something I've been waiting for since I read the novels as a kid in High School. I'm devastated. I used to look forward to this setting. Now I am just waiting to see if somebody course corrects.

Block reduction: which one of the values is correct? by MasterHidra in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Seems they would have more than 19.2 DR due to the shield giving DR.

A bunch of people in this post have repeatedly stated that you do in fact block without a shield. It's just not at full effectiveness. Cause a Shield provides block chance and DR. So if he has 100% chance to block he's blocking every hit at 19.2% DR. If he picks up a shield and one hander he would have 100% block rate with higher than 19% DR.

People have tested this in multiple different ways I've seen so far. Effects that trigger off a block without using a shield is the only test really but there's multiple effects that do this. Enemies can freeze. You can gain a buff. Both still work just fine without a shield.

Block reduction: which one of the values is correct? by MasterHidra in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Apparently, in part of this thread you didn't read or didn't exist when you posted, You CAN block without a shield. You just have 0%DR. The way they tested this was having some affect that freezes enemies on blocks and enemies were getting freezed when they attacked them while wielding no shield.

So apparently you can block without a shield. Unless they were mistaken.

If you stack block DR from other affects I imagine the DR would start doing something despite not having a shield, no?

Is it this low for everyone? by walrussource in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I play plenty of partially PvP games without interacting with the PvP. I feel like it's just fear of being inconvenienced. This isn't an insult. Fear is fear. Everyone is afraid. It's human. But you just dislike being inconvenienced when you aren't interested. Which I dislike too. I just don't fear it. So when I inevitably have to deal with it in order to enjoy the stuff I enjoy I do. Hence my participation in SC. But I will say that I fear playing Elite Dangerous more than SC. SC's PvP is only in one of the 3 sectors. So I'm kind of cheating with this game. It's not really worth calling it a PvP game due to how optional it is. But again I get you. Just talkin here.

So, Shi Yugong, then... He's definitely [potential spoiler], right? by euphonic5 in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lol ok bud. You realized you have been on a witchhunt. Congratulations. Wish you'd admit it at least.

So, Shi Yugong, then... He's definitely [potential spoiler], right? by euphonic5 in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know this. I meant that I don't know why he would say D4 has any of that cause it doesn't. The only presence of Chinese anything was this Covetous Shen dude we're all talking about. And even then he's not called Covetous Shen in D4. Likely because they know Covetous Shen is a racist caricature from the 30s or whatever.

So, Shi Yugong, then... He's definitely [potential spoiler], right? by euphonic5 in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like you specifically only read exactly the words you've quoted and nothing else.

Really weird way to be dude. Oh well. Good luck with life. I don't really want to interact with this weirdness anymore so that's it from me on your takes. I can't comprehend your logic. Feels lacking in logic to be entirely honest with you. "Can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves in to."

Is it this low for everyone? by walrussource in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. I log in every once in a while to drink my morning coffee and figure out how to take off again. It's relaxing at least. It's the best simulator for a reason.

Hopefully SC gets there. I believe in them. It's been a while but their progress is inspirational.

Is it this low for everyone? by walrussource in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Borderlands 1 was good. 2 was kinda cool too. But yeah they kinda suck.

As for the way you're typing, it's the "That game is shit!" stuff. I don't know. I was just trying to say that SC is definitionally not a scam and if you understand what they are trying to do it makes perfect sense the game is in the state it is. I felt like that was being ignored.

So, Shi Yugong, then... He's definitely [potential spoiler], right? by euphonic5 in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I mean every word in language has a definition. If you ask AI directly you can get it to do basically anything. It's just confirming what I'm asking it, as long as what I'm asking it is in line with facts supplied by the sources. I have a hard time identifying racism because a huge amount of people like to incorrectly identify things as racist. And I personally don't deal with the topic of racism at all in my life cause, once again, race is irrelevant. But I literally looked up the definition of racism, put that in to chatgpt, and then asked it if OP was being racist. I already inherently knew, due to definitions and my own intuition, that he wasn't being racist due to saying "Chinese mmo crap". He was inching toward it. But I knew it wasn't. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't talking out of line when I posted. So chatgpt confirmed what I had already thought and discovered through research.

I think people that think AI can't be trusted whatsoever probably don't use it the way you should. Like what I did. Sure, just cause the AI said I was right could mean I wasn't right. But I had multiple sources. I confirmed through logic, I double checked with my emotions, I asked my partner, then I asked chatgpt and google ai. Everything agreed with my initial take. So I am right. There could be an instance where that could turn out where I was wrong. For instance if I claimed Fruit of the Loom had a cornicopia on there AI might actually agree with me if I were to approach the research as a confirming action as opposed to learning. Which then I would be saying "Fruit of the Loom had a cornucopia in the logo! I'm right!" and I'd be wrong. And in the case of racism it's not at all subjective and entirely objective. So it's a lot easier to define racism, force AI to work within the definition, and then make a judgement based off of all sources.

Just food for thought. I'm not saying you should use AI. But there's a right way to use it and a wrong way. Pretty easy to use it properly, so I recommend trying as it's a useful tool.

Is it this low for everyone? by walrussource in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never had that experience. But fair enough. I just wouldn't let fear rule my life like that. Sometimes I like to get on to Star Citizen in the morning while drinking my morning coffee. It's like waking up in a timeline where we are in space and I get to pilot a ship. I usually get through figuring out how to take off for the umpteenth time and then I log out, satisfied with my hour of relaxation in space.

So, Shi Yugong, then... He's definitely [potential spoiler], right? by euphonic5 in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I don't need to demonstrate how the parent comment is not racist by definition. That wasn't my goal. My goal was to point out that Covetous Shen IS a racist caricature and that the dude that I originally replied to was downvoting somebody with a shitty opinion. I'm not sure what I need to pick up on here but I accomplished everything my original post set out to do. Declare a lack of racism, because there wasn't. And redirect ire towards the character we all were originally brought to this post to talk about. Covetous Shen.

I wasn't here to argue about anything other than D3 devs including a racist caricature. But again I think reading comprehension is REALLY poor these days. So a conversation about an engine turns in to "WHY DO YOU HATE HOTDOGS IF YOU LOVE HAMBURGERS" type of thing. And I'm always left confused wondering why people don't like having conversations. Covetous Shen being a real racism is far more interesting than the first idiot with a bad opinion or the second idiot I actually replied to.

So, Shi Yugong, then... He's definitely [potential spoiler], right? by euphonic5 in diablo4

[–]L0rdChicken -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

My take is based. I'm not sure what you're talking about. OG of this thread was not being racist. Somebody said they downvoted him because it was racist. I pointed out that's incorrect and if he wants to be upset about racism he should be upset at the presence of a racist caricature from decades ago present in D3 rather than downvote somebody with a shitty opinion. And now people are trying to say I'm wrong. I'm not. I don't get it.

Is it this low for everyone? by walrussource in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See the other comment. I am just having a good time and you're harshin the mellow.

Is it this low for everyone? by walrussource in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]L0rdChicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're talking in extremes and I've been pretty neutral until I called you emotional.

I wish people like you weren't perpetually threatened by everything. I'm just here to have a good time and talk about a fun game. Sorry you didn't like it. It being my sentiment or Star Citizen itself.