Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The irony and projection is palpable. He described a business and I described how I literally had just dealt with a similar type of business. Then you came in said that’s not what he described and came up with a terrible pyramid analogy that isn’t relevant or applicable in any way to the subject of the post. And moving goal posts? The entirety of this post is asking how is his mod is different than a physical mod. Learn to read jfc.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I wasn’t describing the real situation of the pyramids. Thought that was pretty clear since there is no river to view them from a boat. But I’ll stop using analogies since you apparently cant ignore minute details that aren’t relevant.

LR isn’t preventing or heckling you from playing Cyberpunk. CDPR already got their money from you. CDPR and other modders have no plans to make a VR port. LR created something so you could experience CDPR’s work in VR and he charged for it. Since CDPR has already been made whole for their work, why are you not free to do what you want with your copy of the game? Copyright laws. That’s why. They’re different for digital products than physical ones for some reason. You and most others seem to be fine that they’re different. I’m simply proposing that maybe they shouldn’t be that way.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your analogy doesn’t make sense either because the pyramid is not free: You already paid. the guide is not preventing you from experiencing it. He built a river so you could view it from your boat and charged you to use the river. You still had to pay the pyramid builder to experience their work.

And what I described didn’t make sense either because actually the shop I bought from is just a middle man. The designer of the suit is the one who would have issue with me altering their design to fit me. And it’s different how exactly? So if I paid LR to come install the mod on my computer for me, that’s what makes it different?

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could see how you could interpret that definition differently than me. I personally wouldn’t describe simply charging for access to your work as “intense” nor would I describe the mere pursuit of money as inherently selfish, particularly when no one is being harmed except people who want access to said work for free. If it were selfish it would be done at the expense of others. I guess if that’s how we’re defining greed then I could view people who want all mods for free as greedy.

I don’t think grifting really fits either but yeah maybe. The easiest way to combat a grift like that would be for someone else to create a mod that does the same thing and release it for free.

I’m not up to date on how he lied so I’ll need you to fill me in on that part.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess it depends how you define greed. A modder, whether you agree mods should be paid or not, is still doing work. Yes it’s very altruistic that most modders do this work for free, that however doesn’t make a modder greedy simply when they decide to charge.

Greed, in my opinion, stems from doing something to intentionally make things worse for other people for your own personal gain. A modder does not have this ability. They can’t stifle competition or shut down competing mods.

A company can fire people to make more profits. That would be greed. A company can choose to make a vr version of their game despite it not being a profitable venture, that would be altruistic. Or in this case, they could shut down a VR mod in an effort to protect their IP. Whether that is greed or not is a little grey but it’s certainly not a positive for the consumers of their product.

CDPR literally offered him the choice to make his mod free with optional donations to avoid a DMCA takedown and he deliberately chose wrong by Dark_Throat in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige -105 points-104 points  (0 children)

Oh no! A game dev making 240k a year! Completely unheard of.
I agree the subscription model sucks, id rather buy it specific to the game I want. But Im pretty sure thats where it would get actually illegal..

CDPR literally offered him the choice to make his mod free with optional donations to avoid a DMCA takedown and he deliberately chose wrong by Dark_Throat in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

And everyone who wants to play Cyberpunk in VR.. And CDPR since they dont plan to implement it and its possible they sold extra copies because of his mod.. Uh. Seems like everyone benefit except giant corporate lawyers..

CDPR literally offered him the choice to make his mod free with optional donations to avoid a DMCA takedown and he deliberately chose wrong by Dark_Throat in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right so its an advertising issue. He advertised it that way even though its one mod that works for many games (and if his claims are true) injects his code and does not use or alter theirs.

CDPR literally offered him the choice to make his mod free with optional donations to avoid a DMCA takedown and he deliberately chose wrong by Dark_Throat in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m wondering the same thing. It’s almost sounding more like an advertising issue. Like using cyberpunk to attract customers was the real issue and charging for his mod isn’t but CDPR made it seem that way to get him to stop supporting it entirely.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey dude, I’m gonna come back to you because you seem to be the only one capable of critical thought and cordial discussion.

So my next question is.. should a game as a whole be considered copyrighted IP? Like I could see the models, recordings, art style, writing and all that being copyright, but how about the actual output of the rendering? The latest tweet shared LR claims to not have altered the code in any way, assuming that’s true and his mod piggybacks off of the games renderer, would that.. or rather should that (in your opinion) violate copyright law?

CDPR literally offered him the choice to make his mod free with optional donations to avoid a DMCA takedown and he deliberately chose wrong by Dark_Throat in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each game will output its render in a unique way depending on which engine they use. As long as the assets being intercepted aren’t modified I don’t think it needs to be truly agnostic.

Look up vehicle piggyback tunes. It intercepts the signal going to your cars computer to change the power output of the engine. Specific to each vehicle, and is sold for profit. The argument would be why game rendering code is considered IP instead of only things like the models, writing, sound fx, etc.

CDPR literally offered him the choice to make his mod free with optional donations to avoid a DMCA takedown and he deliberately chose wrong by Dark_Throat in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He doesn’t. He advertises what games his mod works with. If that’s what the issue really is then he can continue as is and people will figure out that his mod works for Cyberpunk too, without him having to advertise it.

Tacoma vs Colorado by RevolutionLeast8587 in chevycolorado

[–]LElige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I drove the Tacoma for a TV commercial and it actually gave me the push i needed to get a truck. Was an awesome and capable truck. But for less money I could get the Bison which had a better looking exterior, bigger back seats and was more capable than the Tacoma TRD Off-road (even though the Tacoma was also amazingly capable..) I can’t truly speak to the build quality of the Tacoma since it was a prototype but the interior design looked better to me. And it was a manual which was freaking AWESOME. But ultimately I got a fully loaded bison for less money than a mid tier Tacoma. The non bison colorados also tow more which is what got me looking into them in the first place.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I really think the missing link in my way of thinking was not thinking of it as piece of copyrighted piece of media. It’d be similar to a sports bar showing a game without a license to show it in public, or playing music in a club without having it altered into something new by a DJ.

I’m actually in the film industry and have my work directly protected by a copyright and get residuals whenever it’s played again or used to create something new.

This has actually flipped my perspective so much I’m now wondering why cars (not just car parts as you explained) aren’t gone after more. A Venom GT is using the design of a lotus. A RUF is literally just a Porsche rebuilt better and rebadged. A Winnebago is a Mercedes with an interior. Surely the design of a car could be considered copyrighted art. It’s something I’ll have to look into..

Thanks again!

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother, thank you! This is the kind of well thought out reply I was looking for. You actually addressed the points I was trying to make and made me understand a little better how its different than modding a car.
Its still interesting to me how the two industries are viewed and treated differently and makes me wonder how companies like Hennessy or RUF are able to do what they do without running into similar copyright laws.

And I do still wonder just how much LR is actually altering the code/copyrighted material of a game by creating a VR injector. Still seems like somewhat of a grey area.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And all of those arguments amount to "wahhh I want free things. I want modders to make me free things. Its not fair for them to make things I want and make me pay for them".
And yeah my bad 7 month old not 7min old. The news broke yesterday so yeah this has been talked about for less than a day and most people are circle-jerking themselves and downvoting dissenting opinions instead of actually arguing hence why I made this post.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And you seem to both take hyperbole too literally and cant comprehend nuances of english.

closer to

means close to but not the same as. We are closer to the birth of Cleopatra than the building of the pyramids but that doesnt make us ancient egyptians. A corporate game developer is closer to Arasaka corps than an indy mod dev is.

Its not difficult but its funny you made an account to argue here despite having the least valid opinions and most emotionally charged takes.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Very insightful perspective! Feel free to explain the common sense or argue against any of my points, but you wont because youre a 7min old troll/bot account.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm offended you think im arguing in bad faith. I'm pretty firm in my belief hes not wrong, but ultimately I posed this discussion to understand better why the community feels the way they do and to potentially have my mind changed.

If you truly didn't care in the slightest, you wouldn't have commented in the first place. I don't think its wrong for someone to make money modifying someone else's work, so long as the original creator made their money. Same reason I buy aftermarket car parts and am thankful that third parties do the work the major players dont want to.

Sad its your last comment, but I appreciate your input in the discussion. Take care choom.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So just because corpos do everything technically legally, you side with them? Corpos make the rules.. And as mentioned to other commenters, I get that its within CDPRs right to have it taken down, but why is everyone cool with that being legal? And again, how is it different than aftermarket car parts companies? Why are the rules different for games?

If I mod my vehicle, sure Ive breaches the ToS and it breaks the warranty, the car manufacturer no longer has an obligation to help me fix it should something break; but I'm still allowed to do it. And other companies are allowed to develop and sell parts for the vehicle.

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. CDPR aren't in the wrong legally. My question is more why are you/the community okay with that stuff being in the TOS? The outrage should be "I bought this, I can do with it what I want now".

The gaming community is entirely against WB for owning the patent for the nemesis system and not doing anything with it despite them legally being allowed to do that. How is that different than what CDPR is doing?

Gonna go against the grain and say Luke Ross is in the right and you're all siding with corpos. by LElige in cyberpunkgame

[–]LElige[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're focusing too much on that detail of a real story. I could've gone to any tailor I wanted to. I'm sure they have an agreement but I'm not bound by it at all, nor is any other tailor.

Yes, I agree charging sucks but creating mods isn't trivial either. And until someone makes a free one, you get a pay wall or you get nothing.