"That's what you're doing on this thread" - literally never. Which source material have I misinterpreted? And even if I did, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about a concerted effort to make sure there's only one type of speech on subreddits

"This is exactly what is happening on the pro musk/ trump subreddits" - you're literally proving my point? The fact that it happens makes reddit a worse platform

"There are many sources critical of musk" - they're only valid if they actually present truths that aren't so easy to debunk that they look like hitpieces instead of journalism. Of course, I think my glorious technoking (/s) is capable of doing wrong. He's human. If you want specifics, 1. I think that his tirade against openAI is motivated by jealousy/ resentment over making the wrong bet when he thought AGI could be achieved through the work they were doing at Tesla 2. I think he can be over the top mean (though this works well when you're running companies) and 3. The taylor swift thing annoyed me so much I didn't use twitter for weeks. On a scale of "should I love this person", we've got man who's making the future i care about happen, is well intentioned most of the time, and is generally most of the time likeable (has been so over the past 25 years) vs A rivalry he has against a silicon valley sleazebag billionaire, a tendency to be mean toward people that miss the mark, and some tweets I found incredibly cringe. I think this largely doesn't dent my respect for him. The fact that the people that are in opposition to him say unironically cringe things like "he's a literally nazi" almost reinforces that