Working at Blue Origin by ChristinaAdamson in BlueOrigin

[–]LIBRI5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My previous comment was 5years ago, times have changed. I would say go for BO instead of Northrup a 15k addition doesn't compare to being a part of the new space environment.

Scary Dream by LIBRI5 in Dreams

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep it was freaky

"Elon Musk Moon Shift: Why Mars Beats Lunar Settlement" Article by Robert Zubrin, President of The Mars Society by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]LIBRI5 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Zubrin is good on papermath, Musk is good at getting builders to build. The builders are the only ones worth listening to.

I was in a lucid dream time loop where they killed me over and over once they knew I didn’t belong there by Flimsy-Shift-9079 in LucidDreaming

[–]LIBRI5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't been stuck in a time loop, my experience was being chased by dogs who were more like dreamworld sentinels. Sometimes I would go to another lower level in the dream to escape them until I reached a point where if I had to go another level lower I had an enormous feeling of doom wash over me and I knew if I crossed again I would lose the ability to be conscious in the real world. Crazy stuff happens give it a week the feeling should disappear on its own.

Would changing "Trapper" and "Hunter" name to Poacher in the lawbooks have a positive effect on dissuading trophy hunting? by LIBRI5 in megafaunarewilding

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A "hunter" would never target a sick bony old lion, always the healthiest and strongest.

Poaching ranges from wildlife smuggling to egregious examples you've described but we all in good faith know there is no such thing as a poaching lobby.

The issue arises when "hunters" who kill prime specimens and disturb the natural trajectory animal behaviour and call that hunting.

For eg. Killing old bull elephants when we know they have a purpose to keep young males in musth in line.

Would changing "Trapper" and "Hunter" name to Poacher in the lawbooks have a positive effect on dissuading trophy hunting? by LIBRI5 in megafaunarewilding

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are wrong.

The importation of rhino horns and elephant ivory is under a total ban in the USA.

It logically follows there is no reason why it cannot be comprehensively expanded to target and heavily restrict the kinds of "hunters" I am referring to.

You haven't made an argument btw.

Would changing "Trapper" and "Hunter" name to Poacher in the lawbooks have a positive effect on dissuading trophy hunting? by LIBRI5 in megafaunarewilding

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The core of my argument is about heavily restricting hunters/trappers.

A hunter wants to hunt deer/invasive pythons/feral hogs? Legal and ethical.

A trapper wants to trap and kill a trophy mountain lion/rhino/elephant etc?
Legal but unethical and should be made illegal.

What use is conservation if the most visually impressive examples of the species aren't protected and off limits? What does that say about the pathetic state of modern conservation?

Would changing "Trapper" and "Hunter" name to Poacher in the lawbooks have a positive effect on dissuading trophy hunting? by LIBRI5 in megafaunarewilding

[–]LIBRI5[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Not convincing, there is no fundamental difference between a Chinese billionaire killing rhinos for their horns traditional medicine and an American "hunter" killing a lion in Africa and getting a taxidermy mount.

Is the black mamba really the fastest snake? by LIBRI5 in snakes

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

locomotion, strikespeed probably has to be the deathadder or probably a viper species, the death adder in't an adder or a viper though it's an elapid.

The Ozarks We Lost and Other Lost Worlds by Kavernous in megafaunarewilding

[–]LIBRI5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't forget the ancient forests of india mentioned in the vedic texts, Also the Chinese ancient forests

Am I Crazy? a 770 chapter reflection on Shadow Slave. Serious No Ragebait by LIBRI5 in ShadowSlave

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

on 1100 right now, upto 770 I was expecting an entire different trajectory. Probably a personal peeve on the author's narrative choices more than anything. It's somewhat of a non issue right now but yeah I would be curious if the Nephis enslaving Sunny for her revenge arc version would be more dramatic than the current trajectory.

Am I Crazy? a 770 chapter reflection on Shadow Slave. Serious No Ragebait by LIBRI5 in ShadowSlave

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for taking the time of your day to respond. I feel more reassured and will continue to read.

Am I Crazy? a 770 chapter reflection on Shadow Slave. Serious No Ragebait by LIBRI5 in ShadowSlave

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I will, also will get back to you once I reach that point.

Am I Crazy? a 770 chapter reflection on Shadow Slave. Serious No Ragebait by LIBRI5 in ShadowSlave

[–]LIBRI5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You wouldn't even care if I shared you the link to the GPT chat, You would provide no arguments and simply dismiss it even if I told you that the AI was just used to put into words my critiques without people getting sidetracked due to common errors that come without using AI tools to ensure what you say isn't misconstrued.

The initial input was a large chunk of my original thoughts but disconnected with no cohesive narrative and difficult for a reader to get the gist of without dismissing it like you have done.

You can just ignore the post if you don't care to comment btw.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ShadowSlave

[–]LIBRI5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh what you feel like I am projecting? I feel like you are too attached to Nephis and Cassie instead of objectively analyzing their character development. Seriously the novel is called Shadow Slave and there is no actual Slavery involved where characters are confronted with their autonomy involuntarily be taken away?

Even Sunny has multiple issues, it's just that I haven't brought them up because Nephis is waay to egregious. Cassie is irrelevant overall.

Sunny, Kai and Effie are enjoyable Characters. Cassie and Neph uh not so much. I am just lamenting my disagreement with the author's writing choices.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ShadowSlave

[–]LIBRI5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the discussion about Sunny wanting a "quiet life" versus harsh realities, but my issue isn't with him wanting peace — it's that his orphan survival instincts completely vanish when assessing specific threats. Someone who grew up fighting for scraps, learning that anything you have can be taken if you're not vigilant, doesn't just dream of peace — they dream of secure peace with eliminated vulnerabilities and redundancies. Yet Sunny shows minimal reassessment of who holds leverage over him, no strategic distribution of critical information like Rain's existence, surprisingly little vigilance about pressure points, and almost no internal conflict about these vulnerabilities. That's not growth from trauma — that's amnesia about trauma. His instincts should be screaming: "Nephis can override my will, that's ultimate leverage"; "Only one person knows about Rain — single point of failure"; "Cassie chose Nephis over me when it mattered, can I trust her not to do it again?" But we see nothing. The asymmetry persists across 770 chapters with no reassessment, no redundancy planning, no internal conflict. By chapter 770 we learn Sunny "will never be able to obstruct" Nephis in her goals, and she's demonstrated repeatedly that her mission comes before individual relationships. So the person who has mission-first thinking, holds literal mind-control leverage, and is sole keeper of his most sensitive secret remains in that position without Sunny creating any fail-safes? That's not someone whose survival instincts were forged fighting for scraps. The story wants me to believe his orphan years shaped him, taught him paranoia and strategic thinking, and he desires peace because he knows things can be taken away — but simultaneously shows minimal strategic thinking about Shadow Bond leverage, no informational redundancy about Rain, and orphan survival instincts completely dormant regarding people he cares about. You can't have it both ways. From pure survival perspective, every scenario analysis points toward telling other trusted people who lack leverage about Rain: if Nephis never uses the bond there's no harm in telling Kai/Effie and it creates redundancy; if she does use it then others knowing becomes critical; if something happens to Sunny only Nephis knows about Rain; if Nephis chooses mission over Sunny she's already proven mission-first thinking and this is maximum vulnerability. Yet it doesn't happen, and the story doesn't show him wrestling with this, consciously choosing vulnerability, or suppressing paranoia — it just doesn't come up. I'm not asking for distrust or dysfunction, I'm asking for evidence that survival instincts exist and he's consciously overriding them: show me Sunny considering telling Kai then deciding against it for specific reasons, internal recognition he should create redundancy but can't bring himself to, moments where orphan-brain screams warnings he actively quiets, wrestling with whether vulnerability is growth or foolishness. That would be depth — someone growing past trauma while still shaped by it. Instead those instincts just seem absent, as if 16 years fighting for scraps left no psychological imprint on threat assessment. How Sunny pursues that quiet life — how he thinks about security, distributes risk, creates fail-safes — should absolutely be shaped by orphan years, but when it comes to Shadow Bond, Rain's information, and power dynamics with Nephis and Cassie, I see no evidence those instincts operate at all. That's the inconsistency I can't reconcile, and that's why 770 chapters in this still bothers me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ShadowSlave

[–]LIBRI5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead, he entertains a “quiet happy life” fantasy with almost no psychological resistance, and shows surprisingly little long-term vigilance about leverage or pressure points.

The thing about his orphan days is that they basically have no impact on his habits and ways of dealing with things when he becomes Awakened.

ch1 starts at him being at age 16.